The internet alternative media has been a haven for important presentations of vital research; as well as also harboring a fair amount of opportunism, outright misrepresentation of facts, and shoddy ethical practices. It is up to viewers, listeners, and readers to decide once they are given better information.
My thanks to Maarit, who contacted me with her concerns about the factual misrepresentations she found in the Dark Journalist “X Series”. We chose to focus on the most basic levels of the information—minus the “woo woo”—and go straight to the heart of the credibility claimed by DJ, himself.
Dark Journalist, who operates under the nom de guerre Daniel Liszt (real surname, Robillard), has insisted on integrity and factual information when pursuing alt-media figures such as Corey Goode and David Wilcock. Yet, when approached by this writer and others for information about his background and claimed journalism credentials, was elusive and passively combative. Claiming “higher ground” by championing high profile author-researchers and disclosure figures such as Joseph P. Farrell, Catherine Austin Fitts, Richard Dolan, and Linda Moulton Howe. Liszt has established his platform as being ” an independent investigative reporter “. Fair enough.
In this interview, we outline ten points of factually based errors, misstatements, exaggerations, and very poor research, which place his “X Series” steganography into serious question. While no single information source is infallible and we allow for that; we also note that he has been repeatedly offered corrections on this factual information which he chose to ignore, altered to fit his narrative, or dismissed. Based on the information presented here, and in viewing other shows in this long series, it appears that the Dark Journalist has ventured into fabrication, convolution, and blurring fact with legend in attempting to use an arcane form of cryptography to amass data into a branding of UFOlogy and Conspiracy.
View on YouTube
Conspiracy Daily Update 