The news for the news media keeps getting worse.

A new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll out Monday shows that while the public has low trust in the Trump administration, they trust the media even less.

Just 30 percent of Americans said they have a “great deal” or “good amount” of trust in the news media, the poll shows. That’s lower than the 37 percent of Americans who said the same about the Trump administration. The poll found that 37 percent of adults said they trust the media “not at all,” while another 31 percent said they have “not very much” trust in the news media.

Democrats trust the media far more than either Republicans or independents, the poll shows. While 56 percent of Democrats said they have a “great deal” or “good amount” of trust in the news media, just 28 percent of independents and nine percent of Republicans said the same.

Trust in media appears to be headed in the wrong direction.
The percentage of Americans who have a great deal or good amount of trust in the media dropped four points over the last four months, down from 34 percent when NPR ran the same poll in March. The drop in trust in the media follows a rough stretch for journalists, as reporters have botched several stories on the Trump administration in recent months. (RELATED: CNN’s Month-Long Nightmare)

Americans also have low trust in opinion polls, according to the latest NPR poll.

Sunday on CNN, White House Correspondent for CNN Jim Acosta said President Donald Trump’s tweet of a video that shows him wrestling a CNN logo was “going to lead to a journalist being hurt.”

Acosta said, “I think our statement really sums it up. You know, there are two approaches to this. One is, we can just sit back and be silent and just take it. There are some people who say don’t take the bait. You are going to encourage this behavior even more.

I think we’re well past that now. I think we’re at the stage where we have to try the other approach, which is we have to stand up to this. We have to confront this and say that it’s wrong. I speak for myself. I can’t speak for everybody who has covered Donald Trump since he was a candidate.

I covered him throughout that campaign, and now that he’s president of the United States—my concern is, and I know it’s shared by others, is that this kind of rhetoric, this kind of behavior is going to lead to a journalist being hurt. That’s the thing I worry about.”
He continued, “I hate that I’m worried about that on 4th of July weekend when we’re all supposed to be celebrating our freedoms, including the First Amendment, the right to free speech and the free press. That’s what I’m concerned about, and I think where we stand right now is—people have a choice on all sides of the political spectrum, on both sides of the political aisle.

Where are you going to stand in all of this? Are you going to say well, it’s okay for the president to engage in this kind of attack the news media, try to intimidate the news media? He’s trying to silence us, that’s what’s going on here. Or are people going to say enough is enough? I think that we’ve reached that point where people need to say, enough is enough.

Fox’s Sean Hannity has had a rivalry with MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski for quite some time. They have traded jabs back and forth on twitter. Hannity recently announced that he would pay for Joe and Mika’s couple’s therapy. However, after President Trump’s tweets about Mika, the conflict escalated.

Mika and Joe have been milking the attention they have been receiving after President Trump’s tweets. Mika has called President Trump a ‘dictator’ ‘not well’ ‘ill’, and compared him to North Korea, ISIS and Hitler. However, the media will never point this out. They will just call Trump the bully. Hannity slammed them hard.

“I’m am very very close to going “there” with Joe and Mika. Sick of their BS,” tweeted Hannity. He posted a link to an American Thinker blog called “Joe and Mika, wallowing in the mud”.
“The ever-execrable Joe Scarborough and Mika Brezenski are basking in the glory of mud of their own making; they think they are heroes of a kind because Trump tweeted something crass about them. Indeed he did. But it was well-deserved. The pair host a morning program on the anti-Trump MSNBC each morning to which they dedicate nearly every moment to trashing Trump in every conceivable way, mostly personal,” wrote the article.

Trump’s White House Payroll Projected to Save Taxpayers $22,000,000 Over Obama’s White House

-Billionaires are working for FREE to “Make America Great Again”
-Multimillionaires are working for $30,000 salaries to “Make America Great Again”
-No “Czars”
-No Expensive Fellowships
-Nineteen fewer assistants for Melania than Michelle

On Friday, the White House released their annual financial report on White House personnel to Congress. The report included the positions and salaries of all 337 White House employees. This projected salary savings for Trump’s White House over a four year period exceeds $22 million. Female staffers are making as much as men. There are billionaires working for free. There are multi-millionaires working for $30,000 per year. The President donates his entire $400,0000 salary to the National Park Service.

According to Forbes, here are some key findings:

-There are 110 fewer employees on White House staff under Trump than under Obama at this point in their respective presidencies.

-$5.1 million in payroll savings vs. the Obama FY2015 payroll. In 2017, the Trump payroll amounts to $35.8 million for 377 employees, while the Obama payroll amounted to $40.9 million for 476 employees (FY2015).

-Nineteen fewer staffers are dedicated to The First Lady of the United States (FLOTUS). Currently, there are five staffers dedicated to Melania Trump vs. 24 staffers who served Michelle Obama (FY2009).

-Counts of the “Assistants to the President” – the most trusted advisors to the president – are the same (22) in both first-year Trump and Obama administrations. In the Trump White House, Steven Bannon, Kellyanne Conway, Omarosa Manigault, Reince Priebus, Sean Spicer and 17 others make salaries of $179,700. In Obama’s first-year, David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel and twenty others held the title with top pay of $172,000.

-The highest compensated White House Trump staffer? Mark House, Senior Policy Advisor, has a salary of $187,500. Mr. House is “on detail” from a federal agency which allows him to exceed the top pay-grade of $179,700. In Obama’s Administration (2009), David Marcozzi earned $193,000 “on detail” from Health and Human Services.

Review of the Trump White House payroll confirms shows five full time staffers are five staffers dedicated to First Lady Melania Trump. Michelle Obama had twenty four. What a disgrace!

Many people feel that if they pay a premium for a product from a reputable company that they are getting top quality for their dollar. Unfortunately, this doesn’t seem to be the case as one of the country’s most loved and consumed brand has just been hit with a devastating blow to their customer base after they were caught sneaking human feces into their overpriced product.

If the bitter burned taste of Starbucks doesn’t leave a bad enough taste in your mouth, their catering to Islam and hate for President Donald Trump probably does, but now that test results confirm customers’ worst nightmare, even their staunchest liberals supporters are seeking other places to get their daily fix without the side of feces, which probably got in there through the sickest of means.

Starbucks’ Public Relations person has probably been working overtime to cover the company’s backside from the second they alienated conservatives, but now their work s really cut out for them after unfortunate test results prove what they have been snekaing into their cup of joe. The company’s CEO telling customers who supported traditional marriage to get their coffee somewhere else turned out be doing right-wingers a favor who were spared consuming more of their dangerous beverages considering the nasty punch they have in them that millions of customers have been unaware they drinking.

After Starbucks pledged to hire 10,000 Muslim refugees to rebuke President Trump’s initial travel ban back in January, they committed enterprise suicide. That disgusting decision made people wonder what would happen to the quality of their product and customer service with illiterate third-world people with foul customs running shops. That nightmare has just come to fruition, perhaps regardless of the refugees hiring spree, with test results proving that Starbucks is literally full of crap.
Conservative Daily Post reports:

Many people around the world enjoy iced coffee and other cool drinks from baristas employed by Starbucks, Caffe Nero, and Costa Coffee. However, they may want to think twice before ordering again. The BBC’s “Watchdog” program performs consumer affairs checks on popular businesses. Their latest discovery found fecal bacteria in samples from the three popular coffee chains.
Yes, that’s right, bacteria that is present in feces is now included with customer’s ice at Starbucks, Caffe Nero, and Costa Coffee.

Samples taken from various stores found changeable levels of contamination. Head of policy at the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health Tony Lewis said that the amounts were “concerning.” He added that the bacteria “should not be present at any level – never mind the significant numbers found.”

The investigation tested 30 different branches of the chain to make this determination, which included taking samples to check how sanitary the tables, trays, and ice are. While this is probably not the first test of Starbucks products, it’s is the only one to result in evidence that the new item on the menu is actual fecal matter that customers are getting from free with their overpriced beverages. It’s probably of no coincidence that this comes soon after doves of dirty refugees were handed out employment to make a political point that’s clearly backfired on the company now.

After all of the travel ban debate and the tug of war on this executive order between liberal judges and our president, the Supreme Court decided to officially uphold Trump’s wishes on the matter. This resolve led to Starbucks immediately speaking out to say that they strengthening their commitment of hiring Muslim refugees. They followed through by bringing on 2,500 in England and other parts of Europe, right before fecal matter showed up in their products.

The problem with hiring and accepting refugees is the cultural hygienic difficulties it creates. In Germany and France, the situation is so dire that a company has invented a “multicultural toilet,” Conservative Daily Post explains. Despite pictogram instructions, third world invaders don’t understand how to use Western facilities.

“Many migrants will have never seen toilet paper before,” writes one Deutsche Welle journalist. He added, “refugees nationwide have squatted on toilet rims or the floor of the bathroom… others have relieved themselves in the shower stalls, leaving behind human excrement on the floors.”

Of all the wonderful things that President Donald Trump says and does, liberals are particularly triggered by his promise to build a wall on the Mexican border.

Liberals hate the idea of a border wall for two reasons.
First, it hurts their precious feelings. They get sad when they realize that people need to be deported in order for us to live in a nation of laws. In their minds, America is a magical place filled with candy and unicorns, where everyone is allowed to just hop in and get free stuff. Little do they know that the real world does not work this way, and that this mentality has devastated our economy.

Second, and perhaps most importantly, liberals hate the wall because they know that its existence would shrink a valuable Democratic voting bloc. Millions of illegal immigrants vote for Democratic candidates. Whether it’s because they are forced to by local politicians or because they truly support the liberal platform, illegals vote en masse for Democrats. Since Democrats have come to rely on illegal support to win elections, they bend over backwards to grow the illegal population. They know that any plan to restrict illegal immigration would hurt their electoral chances, and thus they oppose the wall.

As a result, liberals were quick to celebrate when the administration announced that it would delay plans to build a wall. They got so carried away with excitement that they even made fun of the president and his supporters for believing that such a project could be completed in the first place.

Now, however, the joke is on them.

As reported by Fox News: The agency in charge of U.S. border security plans to start building prototypes for President Trump’s proposed wall with Mexico later this summer. Ronald Vitiello, Customs and Border Protection’s acting deputy commissioner, said Tuesday that four to eight companies will get contracts for prototypes in San Diego that could be models for the roughly 2,000-mile border. Companies will have 30 days to complete the models.

Watch this video about a possible wall prototype:
It looks like we will get our wall, and it looks like it will be better than anyone expected. Leave it to President Trump to take a construction project and make it even better. Most people expected the wall to consist of simple concrete slabs. Trump, on the other hand, wants only the best. That is why he is open to a more innovative wall, which contains solar panels and other fascinating high-tech features. Of course Mexico cannot be happy about this, watching their rich high-tech neighbor come up with solutions that will allow them to keep out illegals and make money back while they are at it. All while they still worry that Trump will penalize them on trade for the way they have hurt America’s economy all these years.

Regardless of the wall’s exact nature, Americans should be ecstatic that a wall will end up being built. Our southern border has been wide open for far too long. Millions of individuals, including criminals, gang members, and terrorists, have entered the United States by simply passing over some bushes or a small wire fence. Once they arrive here, they sell drugs and commit other crimes. Even non-criminal illegal immigrants cause problems by taking jobs and receiving welfare benefits. This must come to an end if we ever want to fix our broken economy and culture.

The President is in deep trouble again. One would think he had had enough controversy for one week considering his smackdown with two MSNBC hosts. Another video was released showing the President beating up CNN. The video was a 2007 remade WWE wrestling video of the WrestleMania 23 promotion where the President pretended to beat up WWE Chairman Vince McMahon. However, in the video, the President is seen beating up McMahon who’s been replaced with a CNN logo.

After the video shows Trump beating up on McMahon with the CNN logo on top the screen goes to a logo that says, “FNN Fraud News Network.” The President tweeted out the following response with his video,
“#FraudNewsCNN #FNN’. The official @POTUS handle also retweeted the video that appears to be a literal embodiment of his assault against the media.”

The President has jokingly admitted in public that CNN should change their name to fraud because of all the fraudulent stories they have been printing. He has maintained that his use of social media is modernized and there is nothing wrong with it. The video that the President released stemmed from a Reddit thread that most Trump supporters had been and were following.
In response to the release of the video CNN made a formal statement saying, “It is a sad day when the President of the United States encourages violence against reporters. Clearly, Sarah Huckabee Sanders lied when she said the President had never done so.” They went on to say that Trump’s comments were beneath the dignity of the office he holds. The relationship between the two has been bad for some time. He at one point said that the media is the enemy of the American people. As well, on numerous occasions, he has pointed out fake or false articles published by various outlets as an example of the bias they have against him.

Martha Raddetz of ABC News played the clip for homeland security adviser Thomas Boss and asked him his opinions on the clip. Boss said the following, “There’s a lot of cable news shows that reach directly into hundreds of thousands of viewers and they’re really not always very fair to the president. So I’m pretty proud of the president for developing a Twitter and a social media platform where he can talk directly to the American people.”

Raddatz responded asking the following, “He certainly can communicate to the people, but I want to ask you: Is that the kind of communication you want, that he’s beating up on somebody? That he’s beating up on the media? You’re in charge of homeland security there. That seems like a threat.”

The homeland security advisor maintained that the President has a right to defend himself and the video was not a threat but a master salesman playing a joke. Something that is completely within his purview and right. He also noted this is why they voted for and elected him because he is able to wonderfully relate to people.

However, Raddatz would not let it up and refused to let it go. She continued to attack President Trump and called deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders a liar for saying the President does not endorse violence in any way shape or form. She went really low discussing the shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise saying, “You know what happened to Congressman Scalise, and you have these messages out there against the media, and the media has had — I hate this to be all about us, but [Trump] is making it about us, or particularly CNN — some people had to get private security guards. Is that really fair?”

When Raddatz criticized him for not mentioning the issue of communication rather than the message Boss it back hard saying, “But it’s a good example of you or the media producers here deciding what it is that we talk about and what it is we don’t talk about. And so, with respect, I think that that’s why he needs to go around you and the producers that control the message, and directly to the people … and occasionally he likes to speak about those cable programs that are beating up on him unfairly.”

CNN, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC are collectively going crazy about this new video. While it certainly isn’t appropriate the video was by no means a threat. It was a stupid and silly video that brings levity to an acrimonious relationship. The relationship between the leader of the free world and a news outlet that had to fire reporters for publishing false articles. The more the President defends himself, the more the media goes nuts.

Barack Obama jetted off to Indonesia on Friday with his family for another luxury vacation. However, Rep. Trey Gowdy doesn’t think it’s a coincidence that Obama has chosen to head to a country that has no extradition agreement with the U.S. right as the investigation into former Attorney General Loretta Lynch is heating up.

Mad World News reported that Obama chose to head to Indonesia right after the Senate Intelligence Committee opened an investigation into Lynch’s handling of the Hillary Clinton probe. Gowdy would now like to know when Obama plans to come back to the U.S., because he has some questions to ask him.

“Let me hazard a wild guess: that there may be something else on that server that they didn’t want law enforcement to see?” Gowdy said. “That is where you start. I don’t like speculating, but I have dealt in the past with victims who would not cooperate with investigations. Typically, the reason is, there is something else you do not want law enforcement to see.”
This comes right as Obama’s former National Security Advisor Susan Rice is preparing to testify before the House Intelligence Committee.

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAS DROPPED THEIR FIGHT TO CANCEL THE TRADEMARK OF THE NFL’S WASHINGTON REDSKINS. UNDER THE OBAMA REGIME, THE GOVERNMENT PATENT OFFICE HAD CANCELED THE TEAM’S TRADEMARK TO THE “REDSKINS” NAME, SAYING IT WAS OFFENSIVE. THE TEAM THEN SUED THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO KEEP THE TRADEMARK.

The move was precipitated by a Supreme Court decision in another case, which ruled that trademarks could not be canceled just because someone found it offensive. The decision indicated they would also rule to protect trademarks in other cases, including the Redskins.

A group of Native American activists who had also sued to cancel the Redskins trademark withdrew from the case, stating they believed the Supreme Court would also rule in favor of the Redskins.

President Trump had previously voiced his support for the team’s fight to keep the Redskins trademark.

NBC12.COM REPORTS.

The Justice Department is giving up the legal fight over the name of the Washington Redskins.

In a letter to a federal appeals court, the department said last week’s Supreme Court decision in favor of an Asian-American band calling itself the Slants means the NFL team will prevail in a legal battle to cancel the team’s trademarks because the name is disparaging to Native Americans.

Mark Freeman, an attorney for the Justice Department’s civil division, wrote on Wednesday to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals that the court “should reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Pro-Football.”
The Redskins case had been on hold in the federal appeals court while the Slants decision was rendered.

A furious Melania Trump punched back hard against Mika Brzezinski this weekend, defending herself and her son, Barron Trump.

Brzezinski, the “Morning Joe” co-host, was the source of deep controversy this week, as President Donald Trump openly feuded with the MSNBC show over its coverage of his presidency. Trump attacked the hosts of the show personally over their intelligence and looks.

Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough responded, questioning the mental stability of the president. In the fallout of the grudge match, Mika expanded her criticism to the entire first family, going after the First Lady Melania and her son, Barron Trump.

In an interview, Brzezinski claimed Melania has “the worst job in the country” and that it was only because of Barron that she was remaining the first lady.

“I know Melania. I haven’t talked to her in months, but if my gut is right, I don’t think she’s going to put up with it much longer. I know nothing. That’s just my instinct, and I go with my gut, and my gut’s always right. I’m just telling you, Melania’s got the worst job in the country, and I don’t think she wants to do it a lot longer. I think she will do it for as long as she has to for her son, and that’s it.”

After the salacious accusation, the first lady hit back.
Melania responded in a statement, calling the “Morning Joe” co-host “sad.” Melaina said Brzezinski does not “know” her and was using the first family to further her “own agenda.”

It is sad when people try to further their own agenda by commenting on me and my family, especially when they don’t know me.

Brzezinski bringing Barron into the fray to attack the president clearly struck a nerve for the first lady. Just this month, Melania and 11-year-old Barron officially moved into the White House. The very private Barron has become his own star, captivating the White House beat with his bold fashion choices and boyish wonder.

Barron, dressing like his father on an official trip:

Barron has endured his fair share of abuse since Donald Trump entered office in January. He has been:

1. Called autistic in a public video

2. Mocked for his looks at the Inauguration

3. Called a “homeschool shooter”

4. Accused of animal mutilation

5. Called a murderer

Former MSNBC television host and liberal commentator Keith Olbermann sent out a tweet Sunday morning calling for President Trump to be impeached after the president posted a video of himself beating CNN in a wrestling match on Twitter.

“Please RT if you agree the cabinet must invoke the 25th Amendment, TODAY, and immediately remove @realDonaldTrump from the presidency,” Olbermann wrote.
Trump tweeted the video of himself taking down someone whose face is replaced with a CNN logo Sunday morning with the caption “#FraudNewsCNN #FNN.”

At the end of the video, the letters FNN appear with the words “fraud news network” directly underneath them.

The video meme is taken from an event in 2007 where Trump bodyslammed WWE Chairman and CEO Vince McMahon at Wrestlemania XXII.

Various Trump supporters edited the video to show the president tackling his many foes, including CNN.
Liberals, including Olbermann, were not amused by the meme. In his tweet, Olbermann referred to the efforts by congressional Democrats to deem Trump “mentally unfit” to serve as president so they can pass a bill that would allow Congress remove him from office under the 25th Amendment.

The 25th Amendment, ratified in 1967 shortly after President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, addresses the issue of what to do when a president becomes unable to perform his presidential duties. It allows the vice president to assume the presidency in case the president resigns or the cabinet removes him from office because he is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

Olbermann has called for Trump to be impeached several times within 24 hours.

The first time, Olbermann alleged that Trump “attacked freedom of speech” and called for his impeachment
Then, he tweeted that the vice president and the cabinet should use the 25th Amendment to get Trump to resign:

The FBI has had a difficult time of it for several months. That’s the sort of thing that happens when one gets involved with corrupt individuals such as the Clintons and Mr. Obama. Of course, it’s the FBI’s job to “get involved” with corrupt people, but that should be from a position of enforcing the law, not one of letting things slide to benefit political interests.

To add to the problems the agency is dealing with as a result of Mr. Comey’s questionable actions, it has now been revealed that another crime appears to have been covered up.

The Daily Caller is reporting that an FBI agent has been charged with obstruction of justice and making false statements in a shooting incident, and that he faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted on all counts.

Image result for fbi agent

“An FBI agent was indicted Wednesday on allegations of lying to cover up his role in the shooting of militia leader Robert “LaVoy” Finicum in Oregon last year.

“Agent W. Joseph Astarita, a 40-year-old Hostage Rescue Team member, allegedly lied about firing twice on Finicum, who was shot to death in the course of an attempted arrest related to the militia’s occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in January 2016, reported the Oregonian. While Astarita’s shots missed, two state police officers shot and killed Finicum just moments later, possibly triggered by Astarita opening fire first.”
Image result for fbi agent

Unfortunately, we’ve been down this road before with a member of the Hostage Rescue Team shooting a civilian.

“Finicum is seen getting out of the truck and walking through the snow with his hands up in surrender. He then makes a move to reach into his jacket, where the FBI said he was carrying a gun. At that point, one of the authorities walks up out of the woods and shoots Finicum dead from behind.

“The state police officers were deemed justified in shooting Finicum, a verdict which remains unchanged by Astarita’s indictment, according to Oregon U.S. Attorney Billy J. Williams.”

If, indeed, Mr. Finicum was preparing to open fire on the police they were completely justified in shooting him while defending themselves. On the other hand, FBI agent Astarita’s indictment clearly demonstrates that he did something for which he felt it necessary to cover up.

And this is why it’s always a better idea to give panhandlers food instead of money. A homeless man who spends his days begging for money at a Brighton, Michigan intersections actually turned down a $10.00 and hour job a car dealership offered him.

A homeless man who spends his days begging for money at a Brighton, Michigan intersections actually turned down a $10.00 and hour job a car dealership offered him.

Dealership management was so in awe by the reason the homeless man gave for not accepting the offer that they did what any hard working American would have done. They let the world know about it by posting a sign which read “Please Do Not give anything to this Panhandler. We offered him a full-time job at $10.00/HR. He said: ‘I make more money than any of you, and he did not want a job. Please donate to a more worthy cause.” Good for them!
Brandon Gaille Reports:

23 Amazing Panhandling Statistics
May 22, 2017
When you see a panhandler out on the street, what is the first thing that comes to mind? Many see panhandlers as lazy people, alcoholics perhaps, and definitely a freeloader. What if everything that society thought about panhandlers happened to be wrong?
In a recent survey, 94% of panhandlers use the funds that they get from the donations of others to simply purchase the food they need.

Some panhandlers do have the ability to make upwards of $80,000 per year, but those are the exception instead of the rule. In San Francisco, for example, the average daily intake for a panhandler is just $25 per day and some people have been living this way for 5 years or more. Many must opt for the cheapest food options available, which mean high fat, low nutritional content foods so that they can stretch their money further.

Three Fast Facts About Panhandling

1. Only 3% of panhandlers don’t want some form of permanent housing that would help to get them off of the street.
2. 48% of panhandlers are African American.
3. 1 out of every 4 panhandlers in the United States has served in the military at some point in time.

Takeaway: There will always be people who try to take advantage of others and panhandling is no different. The problem is that an uncaring attitude toward all panhandlers because of the actions of a few creates future problems that will ultimately create even more panhandlers. When more than 60% of panhandlers make less than $25 per day and when more than 60% of them are disabled in some way, that is not a life that anyone would wish on their greatest enemy… yet there is an expectation that panhandlers should crawl up out of the mess unassisted and contribute to society because a few take advantage of others.

Drug Use Can Be Problematic in Panhandlers

The fight against Islamic infiltration in America is an ongoing battle, however, in other parts of the world, it has already arrived. Over the last 10 years, Europe has been under siege by the Muslim invasion, and political correctness has not helped it either. In an effort to appear tolerant and compassionate, liberals have opened their doors to Islamic extremism under the guise of refugees. Instead of these liberal fools making these refugees assimilate to their culture they have allowed them to take over their land. Now one city has surrendered to Sharia Law and it is only a matter of time before others follow suit.

For years, conservatives have been sounding the alarm on how Islam is slowly creeping into cultures around the world. What makes it even more angering is that this has been allowed to happen due to liberal policies, political correctness, and multiculturalism. That cannot be better depicted than in countries in Europe who have been overrun by Muslim refugees. Instead of European leaders closing their borders and taking a tougher stance against the influx of refugees they are allowing them to continue pouring in. Now, Germany that is already on the brink of an economic collapse is facing another crisis altogether.
In 2014, nine people were arrested after patrolling streets in Wuppertal, western Germany. These men were wearing bright orange jackets with the words “Sharia police” on the back of them. These self-appointed policemen told passers-by that they were not allowed to frequent discos, casinos or bars. Almost three years later the verdict is in and it is absolutely astounding.
The court ruled that they had not violated laws on uniforms and public gatherings. You can watch the stunning report here.

According to Israel National News:

A court in Germany has authorized a group of self-appointed Sharia police to continue enforcing Islamic law in the city of Wuppertal. The law they were cleared of violating outlaws uniforms that are threatening, such as those of Hitler’s brownshirts.

The issue has been brewing ever since 2014, when German politicians reacted strongly to reports of young Salafists conducting nightly “Sharia police” patrols in the city, ordering people to stop various activities, according to the International Business Times.

The men were photographed wearing orange hi-visibility jackets emblazoned with the words “Sharia police” on the back.

They reportedly approached passersby near nightclubs and gambling houses to deter them from un-Islamic activities such as drinking alcohol and gambling.

Ministers in Angela Merkel’s coalition have denounced the actions and said that Germany would not tolerate such Sharia activity.

Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere earlier said that the civilians could not patrol the streets instead of German police.

“Sharia law is not tolerated on German soil,” de Maiziere told the German daily Bild.

“Nobody can take it upon themselves to abuse the good name of the German police,” he added.

Sharia patrols” have been seen in other European cities including London, Copenhagen, and Hamburg.

This is an utter disgrace to see this once proud country being overtaken by these barbarians. But, before anyone can say that this will not happen in America then you are sorely mistaken. Just recently, a bill has been passed in the Senate that would be a HUGE victory for Muslims in their attempts to implement Sharia Law here in America.

Marco Rubio has been instrumental in passing a bill that would make speaking out against Muslims a crime, in a shocking move of treason towards the American people that will leave you speechless.

The President is in deep trouble again. One would think he had had enough controversy for one week considering his smackdown with two MSNBC hosts. Another video was released showing the President beating up CNN. The video was a 2007 remade WWE wrestling video of the WrestleMania 23 promotion where the President pretended to beat up WWE Chairman Vince McMahon. However, in the video, the President is seen beating up McMahon who’s been replaced with a CNN logo.

After the video shows Trump beating up on McMahon with the CNN logo on top the screen goes to a logo that says, “FNN Fraud News Network.” The President tweeted out the following response with his video,

“#FraudNewsCNN #FNN’. The official @POTUS handle also retweeted the video that appears to be a literal embodiment of his assault against the media.”

The President has jokingly admitted in public that CNN should change their name to fraud because of all the fraudulent stories they have been printing. He has maintained that his use of social media is modernized and there is nothing wrong with it. The video that the President released stemmed from a Reddit thread that most Trump supporters had been and were following.
In response to the release of the video CNN made a formal statement saying,

“It is a sad day when the President of the United States encourages violence against reporters. Clearly, Sarah Huckabee Sanders lied when she said the President had never done so.”

They went on to say that Trump’s comments were beneath the dignity of the office he holds. The relationship between the two has been bad for some time. He at one point said that the media is the enemy of the American people. As well, on numerous occasions, he has pointed out fake or false articles published by various outlets as an example of the bias they have against him.
Martha Raddetz of ABC News played the clip for homeland security adviser Thomas Boss and asked him his opinions on the clip. Boss said the following,

“There’s a lot of cable news shows that reach directly into hundreds of thousands of viewers and they’re really not always very fair to the president. So I’m pretty proud of the president for developing a Twitter and a social media platform where he can talk directly to the American people.”

Raddatz responded asking the following,

“He certainly can communicate to the people, but I want to ask you: Is that the kind of communication you want, that he’s beating up on somebody? That he’s beating up on the media? You’re in charge of homeland security there. That seems like a threat.”

The homeland security advisor maintained that the President has a right to defend himself and the video was not a threat but a master salesman playing a joke. Something that is completely within his purview and right. He also noted this is why they voted for and elected him because he is able to wonderfully relate to people.

However, Raddatz would not let it up and refused to let it go. She continued to attack President Trump and called deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders a liar for saying the President does not endorse violence in any way shape or form. She went really low discussing the shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise saying,

“You know what happened to Congressman Scalise, and you have these messages out there against the media, and the media has had — I hate this to be all about us, but [Trump] is making it about us, or particularly CNN — some people had to get private security guards. Is that really fair?”

When Raddatz criticized him for not mentioning the issue of communication rather than the message Boss it back hard saying,

“But it’s a good example of you or the media producers here deciding what it is that we talk about and what it is we don’t talk about. And so, with respect, I think that that’s why he needs to go around you and the producers that control the message, and directly to the people … and occasionally he likes to speak about those cable programs that are beating up on him unfairly.”

CNN, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC are collectively going crazy about this new video. While it certainly isn’t appropriate the video was by no means a threat. It was a stupid and silly video that brings levity to an acrimonious relationship. The relationship between the leader of the free world and a news outlet that had to fire reporters for publishing false articles.

Barack Obama had a goal in mind when he pushed and bribed states to implement the new curriculum called Common Core. That goal was to push Islam onto our children and begin the indoctrination of our entire country. Many parents stood against this curriculum years ago and fought but not enough of us were aware nor did many want to even hear about it. As one of those parents myself, this attack on our educational system is what led me to homeschool my own children. After the push of this dangerous curriculum then it was onto the mass infiltration of migrant Muslim children to further push the schools to adopt policies that were NEVER needed before.

Well, now with President Trump in our corner, parents are now fighting back, and we are actually winning again.

Watch how one California family is dealing with the corrupt policies in his children’s school.

According to Red Nation Report:
A legal group and six parents have filed a lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of a San Diego Unified School District plan to protect Muslim students from bullying. “It’s our position that the anti-bullying policies should protect all students regardless of ethnicity and affiliation, and they shouldn’t be singling out any religious group for special treatment, as they seem to be doing here,” said Charles LiMandri, president and chief council for the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which filed the lawsuit in federal court Tuesday on behalf of the parents.
In April, trustees in the districts voted to create a policy that would protect Muslim students from bullying by, among other steps, increasing lessons about Islam. Students already learn about Islam and other religions as part of a social studies curriculum set by the state, but additional lessons could be added to create a better understanding of the religion, district staff members explained.

LiMandri and others who have objected to the policy said they are concerned the lessons could cross the line separating church and state. The anti-bullying policy is part of a larger effort the district has adopted to make campuses safe for all students. Anti-bullying policies also have been created for LGBT students and students who are Native American and Latino. The latest anti-bullying step was the first to focus on a religion and was sparked by a 2015 Council for American-Islamic Relations Report that found 55 percent of American Muslim students surveyed in California had said they were bullied because of their religion.

The district didn’t have data about how many of those incidents happened in its schools, but a report to the board in April did note that there were seven incidents of bullying between July 1 to Dec. 31, 2016, although it didn’t specify which religion was targeted. “That’s a relatively small number and it does not warrant or justify a wholesale change in the school district or its curriculum,” LiMandri said. “It appears to us that this is a politically correct type of solution looking for a problem,” he continued. “If Muslim students are being bullied, stop the bullying. But you don’t need to implement a program that is favoring Muslim students or one religion over another.”

The latest studies show that it is a FACT that when a city implements and applies the proper immigration laws that crime rates do in fact drop. That is not a racist statistic, nor a false one. Phoenix, Arizona has seen quite a drop in crimes since walking away from the Sanctuary city status and have no choice but to admit that it is due to the fact that most illegal immigrants are illegals because of criminal lifestyles and when they no longer have sanctuary they tend to stop committing so many crimes in order to stay off of the radar.

According to Fox:

At the center of national debate, a question remains unanswered: Are sanctuary cities that protect illegal immigrants safer than non-sanctuary cities? Sanctuary supporters claim they are. “Police chiefs across the nation believe that enlisting local police to enforce immigration law is a bad idea,” California Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De Leon, a Democrat, claimed at a news conference last week. “Having [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] pluck criminals out of jail and send them across the border or wherever they came from only to come right back endangers our communities.” But is that true?

And at least one city, Phoenix, saw a drop in crime after it eliminated its sanctuary city status, according to former law enforcement officials. Yet, some 200 cities nationwide adopted sanctuary policies and lawmakers propose to make California a sanctuary state. While the statute is opposed by the statewide county sheriff’s association, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck supports the bill that would prohibit local police from cooperating with ICE requests for information on illegal immigrants in custody.

“We do not want to dilute trust because trust is the most important thing in policing,” said Chief Beck. “We depend on our communities, particularly our immigrant communities to cooperate with us, not only to keep them safe but to keep all of you safe.” Beck and De Leon were joined by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. They oppose two bills passed Thursday by the House. One measure – named Kate’s law after a young woman who was killed by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times – stiffens punishment for people who re-enter the US illegally. The other strips some federal dollars from “sanctuary” cities that refuse to cooperate with ICE.

Kate’s law is named after Kathryn Steinle, right, who was allegedly killed by Francisco Sanchez, left, who was deported five times. (AP) In the eyes of Levi Bolton, executive director to the Arizona Police Association, that would be a mistake. In May 2008, Phoenix reversed itself, becoming a non-sanctuary state. Under the policy, police had full discretion to ask suspects about their immigration status and had the freedom to call ICE.
Take that California! I predict that now that funding will be drastically cut too many of these so-called sanctuary cities that they will start allowing their police to cooperate with ICE agents in rounding up these criminals and getting them out of our country and upon doing so they will all see a dramatic drop in crimes across the board. More Winning!

President Trump posted a short video to his Twitter account on Sunday in which he is portrayed wrestling and punching a figure whose head has been replaced by the logo for CNN.

The video, about 28 seconds long, appears to be an edited clip from a years-old appearance by Mr. Trump in WrestleMania, an annual professional wrestling event. The clip ends with an onscreen restyling of the CNN logo as “FNN: Fraud News Network.”

Oh California. A state so messed up that they provide nearly free education to illegal immigrants rather than American Citizens in their state Universities, a state so over run with debt, companies’ can’t leave fast enough because of the taxes and regulations, and where an illegal immigrant knows they can go to mooch of the state, collect all sorts of goodies, and roam about with the knowledge that the state of California will protect them from breaking the law, i.e. sanctuary cities.

However, all of that is soon coming to an end. The House of Representatives just passed the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act. This means that California will have two choices. One, cooperate with the Federal Government and eliminate sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants, and help the feds deport these criminals. Two, choose not to follow the law and you receive no more Federal grants from Uncle Sam. For cash strapped state like California, the loss of these Federal grants would be the nail in the coffin for them financially. I suppose California officials have a third choice, raise taxes again, but I think the citizenry might have an issue with that, and they may simply just leave the state. Why anyone would want to live there or have a business there is beyond me.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary hit the nail on the head when he stated, “The word ‘sanctuary’ calls to mind someplace safe, but too often for families and victims affected by illegal immigrant crime, sanctuary cities are anything but safe”. The loony left in California does not care about protecting the citizenry. They want the illegal immigrants so they can use them time and again for their various schemes, including voter fraud. President Donald Trump is doing what he promised and putting America first, something California politicians have yet to pick up on. After The House of Representatives passed the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act, President Trump stated the following; “Innocent Americans are suffering unthinkable violence as a result of these cities’ reckless actions … the implementation of these policies will make our communities safer. Opposing these bills, and allowing dangerous criminals back into our communities, our schools, and the neighborhoods where our children play, puts all of us at risk.”

The best part about this law, and Kate’s Law, named after Kate Steinle, who was killed by an illegal immigrant in the sanctuary city of San Francisco, will not provide very much room for the loony liberal judges in California to circumvent the law. Sure the California Attorney General can challenge the law but what is his argument to the Supreme Court going to be? That California should get a special exception to break Federal law along with other sanctuary cities. I’m sure that sound legal argument will go over real well.

Getting into the specifics of these laws, as reported by Katrina Willis from The Daily Signal, “One bill, Kate’s Law “enhances the current maximum sentences for illegal reentry into the United States, serving as a strong deterrent for deported felons seeking to come back to the United States,” according to its sponsor, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va. It passed 257-167. The other bill, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, deems sanctuary jurisdictions, cities, and states that do not cooperate with immigration officials or enforce immigration laws, ineligible for certain types of federal funding. That passed 228-195”. I would even go one step further and put a provision in the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act or Kate’s Law, that any state official that does not comply with either law can face a jail sentence of up to 5 years and a fine of $250,000. Other than taking away Federal money, there needs to be some real consequences. You know those things that most Democrats think don’t apply to them in their world.

President Donald Trump ran for office saying that the federal government spends too much. And now, with his own budget, he is leading the way by cutting spending in the White House and saving the American taxpayers a projected $22 million.
The savings come from a cut in the amount spent on Michelle Obama’s budget as First Lady, an end to the large number of “czars” and so-called “fellowships” that Obama employed, and a smaller White House workforce, Forbes magazine reported.

After the White House released its annual budget report last week, Adam Andrzejewski, president of government watchdog group OpenTheBooks.com, compared the newly reported budget to the last two years of the Obama administration.
Andrzejewski (pronounced And-gee-eff-ski) noted that there are now 110 fewer White House employees since Obama left office, saving nearly $5 million alone. Also, the First Lady’s staff has been cut from 24 staffers to only five. Michelle Obama entered the White House with a staff of 22 costing nearly $2 million annually, up from the $1.4 million spent during the George W. Bush era.

Another area of savings was the elimination of the so-called policy “czars” with which Obama stocked the White House staff. The Trump budget shows not a single “czar” employed for 2017.

The FCC has been put on notice to investigate the fake news station, CNN, for it’s corrupt and foul misuse of freedom of the press. CNN has knowingly falsified stories time and time again and they presumed that no one would reach a point of saying enough is enough. Well, guess what CNN? We have all had enough.

Nothing is as disgusting to me as false rumors and propaganda being passed off as journalism. As a journalist myself I will be lodging a complaint with the FCC to ensure that CNN is held accountable for their underhanded and shady broadcasting.

With the proof provided by Project Veritas and NUMEROUS CNN employees admitting that many stories are fake we should have enough evidence. Couple that with the statements from these reporters that said that Trump supporters have “s*** for brains,” it shouldn’t be too hard to get them severely punished and hopefully taken off the air. They have discredited the world of honest journalism to the point of no return and it is an absolute travesty!

According to Red State Watcher:

Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC) President Dan Weber has filed a formal complaint with the FCC asking them to look into CNN’s broadcasting of false information. The complaint was filed after damning footage of Van Jones and producers saying the Russian-hacking story is a fraud. Weber wrote the following in a press release:
[I]t became clear CNN personnel are violating FCC rules by ‘knowingly broadcasting false information.’ It is the FCC’s chartered duty to prevent broadcasters from knowingly airing false information, and that’s why I am filing a formal complaint with the agency. I further call on all Americans concerned with the preservation of truth and civil, democratic discourse to join me and the Association of Mature American Citizens by filing their own complaints with the FCC.
Lodge a complaint here at consumercomplaints.fcc.gov
I fully support Trump and all of his tweets regarding CNN and the fake news they panhandle to the liberal left in the hopes of keeping the distraction going and furthering their ratings. Which they are failing at by the way. In May of this year Fox News took the lead in the ratings and CNN is still blistering from it. We can only pray and pitch in by calling and emailing the FCC in mass to get them shut down for good so that legitimate news sites can muster together and save the integrity of honest reporting.

The unbiased side of it all doesn’t really bother many of us in all actuality. There are conservative sites that only write conservative leaning articles and there are liberal sites that do the same but most of them stick to the facts and verify every story being put out. CNN doesn’t even bother to stay honest when being bias. They have been know to make up stories FOR the left to paint the liberal agenda as innocent in all things and that is the farthest from the truth.

Allen West thinks we should not celebrate Fourth of July.

Fourth of July is technically meaningless says Allen West. The Fourth of July is a day like any other. Instead, we should celebrate INDEPENDENCE Day, which happens to fall on the fourth day of the seventh month. (via Allen B. West)

Independence day is the holiday that we gather to celebrate. Calls to celebrate the Fourth of July are part of the long term strategy of the liberal elite desperate to make us forget our history.

Allen West claims the difference between July Fourth and Independence day is subtle, but very important.

It should be clear by now that liberals have been taught to hate our nation, and everything it stands for. Liberals reject our history as a colony, and ignore the accomplishments of the great people who forged our great nation.

While serving as president, Barack Obama undermined our history, and the values that unite us. He spent eight years apologizing for our past, and denounced the “arrogance” of our country.

Shortly before leaving office, Obama made sweeping changes to the Oath of Allegiance. New legal immigrants are no longer required to vow to defend America.
Liberals have been convinced by the Marxist education system and globalist media that America is the source of all the world’s problems — now, brainwashed youngsters think that our country was never great.

The media and schools want us to forget our history. They want us to celebrate the Fourth of July, and forget about Independence Day, and the remarkable history that created the unprecedented prosperity we enjoy. Liberals want to make the day about hot dogs, and not history.

Symbols of national pride are dismantled, and declared racist or sexist. Schools have stopped teaching students to stand in attention with hand-over-heart during the national anthem. The Pledge of Allegiance has been relegated to a relic, and many schools reject the pledge.

Liberals want Americans to be residents, and not patriots. It’s much easier to promote a globalist agenda after national pride has been stamped out.

Why does Mexico want to make it so easy for its citizens to leave their country and immigrate into the the United States? Are these illegal immigrants criminals or people who are largely unemployable they are trying to get rid of?

There’s obviously a problem here in that it certainly does not speak well of a nation when sizable numbers of their citizens are willing to risk arrest in the United States just to get out of Mexico? Why is Mexico engaging in this act of self-humiliation?

Anyway, sanctuary cities in the U.S., which are desirous of hiding illegal immigrants from federal border control authorities are suing Texas to overturn the law that makes such actions by local officials a crime in Texas. Mexico has just filed a brief with the court in support of the position of the sanctuary cities.

It sounds like Mexico wants nothing to stand in the way of their getting rid of some of their citizens, whatever their motivation might be for such a position.

“Mexico filed an affidavit Monday in support of a lawsuit against the implementation of a Texas law to punish sanctuary cities and allow police officers to inquire about the immigration status of someone they have arrested or detained.

“The Mexican government said in a statement that the law could increase racial discrimination and create an environment of persecution.
“The statement said that the number of calls to the center for information and assistance for Mexicans in Texas in May and June increased 678 percent compared to the year prior. This is reflexive of the uncertainty and ‘anguish’ that the Mexican community in Texas has felt due to the law.”

There you go. When all else fails, play the race card: “[T]he law could increase racial discrimination.”

Race is irrelevant in this case. Mexicans and other Hispanics are most welcome to apply to enter the country legally, and many do.

If Mexico were such a desirable place to live, you would think Americans would want to pour into the country. But apart from a couple of nice vacations spots Americans visit briefly, that is certainly not what is happening.

Perhaps the best conclusion would be to presume that Mexican leadership is offended or insulted by the fact that the U.S. might find some of their citizens to be undesirable residents in the United States. They might go so far as to accuse us of racism, which has nothing to do with it.

First Lady Melania Trump rarely involves herself in the gossip that surrounds her husband, President Donald Trump, but Mika Brzezinski went too far. Brzezinski, who is the female half of the low-rated Morning Joe show on MSNBC, turned her anger on the first lady, trash-talking Melania on live TV, and this time, Melania said “enough,” giving Mika a nasty surprise she won’t soon forget.

Melania Trump has stayed out of the fray of all the ugliness surrounding those who hate her husband Donald Trump. Mika Brzezinski and her fiance and co-host Joe Scarborough have waged a war against the president on their Morning Joe show. Daily, the lowly-rated duo spews lies and hatred about Trump, attacking him personally. Finally, the president had enough and fought back through his Twitter account, outing them as enemies to his agenda to make America great again.

Mika trashed the first lady in an In Style interview, saying, “I know Melania. I haven’t talked to her in months, but if my gut is right, I don’t think she’s going to put up with it much longer. I know nothing. That’s just my instinct and I go with my gut and my gut’s always right.” She continued, “I’m just telling you, Melania’s got the worst job in the country and I don’t think she wants (to) do it a lot longer. I think she will do it for as long as she has to for her son, and that’s it.”

Wow, she seems to think she has a special gift she calls “her gut feeling” that can tell the future and that gut feeling is always “right.” This woman is clearly whacked out of her mind over her sick hatred for the Trumps. Don’t worry, Melania heard Mika’s ravings loud and clear and she perfectly responded to the nutty Morning Joe host. Poised and nonchalantly she said, “Do I know you?” referring to the obviously misguided Mika.

It was the perfect comeback, dismissing Mika like a piece of trash you throw away. Melania was making it clear to Mika that she shouldn’t presume to speak about her like she knows her. It’s as if Melania told Mika, I am the First Lady of the United States and you are a lowly rated political hack.

The first lady then made a statement, “It’s sad when people try to further their own agenda by commenting on me and my family, especially when they don’t know me. We have thick skin, and we know that people will judge him and people will call names.”

Of course, the liberal nutjobs in the media take everything Melania says literally. With the “you don’t’ know me” comment, they quickly point out that Mika Brzezinski interviewed Melania once. Those with half a brain understand the meaning of “knowing” someone, as in, Mika claiming her gut feelings know what the first lady will do in the future. Melania was pointing out that Mika is a nobody who doesn’t know her on that level and never will.

It’s no wonder Mika Brzezinski hates the Trumps since they stand for everything her father hated. Mika Brzezinski’s father Zbigniew Brzezinski was one of the leading globalists who actually said he wanted a “one world government.” The elder Brzezinski showed his fondness for Marxist ideology, and in 1970, seven years before becoming President Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor, Brzezinski wrote Between Two Ages. The book laid out his plans for bringing about an incremental world government. Between Two Ages became the blueprint for the globalist Trilateral Commission, which was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller with Brzezinski becoming its first director.