It is the final weeks of Malia Obama’s gap year before she begins Harvard in the Fall, and she is not wasting a moment of it. Malia has been quite the social butterfly over the last year ever since turning 18 years old and has been caught hobnobbing with celebrities and socialites on a regular basis. Malia’s actions have gained her celebrity status from the impressionable youth around the country. Now, these young people are pushing for a National Holiday to be renamed in Malia’s honor which has conservatives reeling.

The Obama family reached a celebrity status during Barack Obama’s term as president. The family’s inner circle often included and was surrounded by professional athletes, rappers, and Hollywood actors. The Obama’s were treated as royalty by the glitterati and they seemed to bask in the hero worship. While all of the Obama’s loved the constant attention they received, Michelle Obama seemed to really adore it and was often seen hanging with celebrities. At the time the Obama’s children were young and impressionable and learned early on how to entertain the Hollywood elite. Apparently, Malia was a quick study and has been following in her mother’s footsteps by partying with rappers and living a socialite life. Now, because of the Obama’s close ties with the Hollywood stars, they are calling that the Fourth of July is renamed in Malia’s honor.

You see, Malia was born on Independence Day and for years leftist trolls have been trying to get the patriotic day renamed. It all started on the Fourth of July when Chance the rapper suggested that July 4th is not about America’s independence, but Malia Obama Day.
Of course, the liberal dolts thought the untalented rapper was onto something and began to tweet Happy Malia Obama Day too.

One of these uneducated fools even baked Malia a cake.

This is what Inquisitr had to say about the fictitious holiday.

Over the last few years, many Americans have taken to not celebrating certain public holidays because of their alleged oppressive origins. The refusal of several people to acknowledge Columbus Day, for example, because it is directly connected with the invasion of America’s native population by Europeans, is a case in point. Apart from the disillusionment of certain Americans with the Trump administration, African-Americans who tweeted the world a “Happy Malia Obama Day” also pointed out that they could not celebrate Fourth of July when the welfare of minorities in present-day America did not feature prominently on the White House’s agenda.

But, of course, such perceived humor did not go down well with certain Twitter users, who argued that people who were choosing to celebrate “Malia Obama Day” instead of the Fourth of July were disrespecting the country. As Mail Online reported, a great number of critics came with a conservative leaning and were fans of President Trump, and did not take to the toasting of Malia’s birthday over that of the country with candor.

“All of you need help for disrespecting the country and the people who fight to preserve the independence we have,” wrote one Twitter user.

Wait a minute here. These people are saying they cannot celebrate America’s birthday because the present-day White House agenda is not about minorities? These liberal loons have lost their damn minds if you ask me. For instance, President Trump appointed Ben Carson as the HUD director since it is his passion to get black people out of the ghettoes. Carson wants to help fix the destruction that the Democrats have done to the black community since the 1960’s. And, let’s not forget the fact that Donald Trump is doing more to help the black community than Obama did for them in the past eight years. President Trump signed an Executive Order earlier this year that will funnel more money to black colleges.

Oh, but you won’t hear that from the left now, will you? At any rate, let us get back to Malia Obama and this absurd “holiday”. The fact that Malia nor her family came out and said that this was disrespectful to the country is absolutely disgusting. It gives the optics that they agree that the Fourth of July should be renamed to honor a twerking, partying teenage girl.

If this girl had an ounce of maturity in her she would renounce it, but she rather basks in the glory from her “fans”. It is obvious that Malia lacked some important lessons from her parents about respect for our country and what it stands for. The only lesson she paid attention to was learning tricks from her mother on how to become a celebrity.

Michelle Obama doesn’t have much to hide anymore now that her true self is coming out and she doesn’t have to pretend to be perfect behind the title of First Lady. However, her classlessness was just seen at a nasty new low with her public display of rage for the most ridiculous reason yet. If there was any question about her arrogance or entitlement this should tell everyone everything they need to know and we wish she would just stay on vacation and out of sight.

Being replaced in her former role as First Lady with someone like Melania Trump was an insult to injury enough, but since Michelle has been given the boot off of her pretentious perch, she’s having a hard time letting that power position go. Perhaps the reality that she’s more or less irrelevant now and that her replacement has completely undone her school lunch legacy, has been the combination of unfortunate events for Michelle that sent her into a complete public meltdown.

Michelle’s “healthy” lunch program that she spent eight years trying to make important was a complete and utter failure from the start. Her food recommendations and school menu changes were unappealing at best. In fact, it was so bad, that it became the joke of the nation on social media with its own hashtag #ThanksMichelleObama. That’s pretty embarrassing, but not as much as her recent temper tantrum over the mass amount of criticism for the failed program.

The Daily Wire reported about Michelle’s embarrassing meltdown:

“Michelle is apparently angry about the criticism that the program, enacted in 2010, received. During an event on Friday, the Partnership for a Healthier American 2017 Healthier Future Summit, she complained that critics were just being ‘partisan’ when they said the regulations on school lunch programs were leading to some pretty horrible meals.”

Speaking in front of a large crowd, the former First Lady went off about her legacy and what the Trumps have done to it.

“So we have a lot more work to do for sure but we got to make sure we don’t let anybody take us back. Because the question is where are we going back to? I mean this is where you really have to look at motives. You have to stop and think, why don’t you want our kids to have good food at school?” a very frustrated Michelle publicly ranted, but didn’t stop there.
“What is wrong with you? And why is that a partisan issue? Why would that be political? What is going on? Now that is up to moms. I’m talking to moms, think about this, take me out of the equation, like me, don’t like me, but think about why someone is OK with your kids eating crap? Why would you celebrate that? Why would you sit idly and be okay with that?” she continued.

“Cause here’s the secret, If somebody is doing that, they don’t care about your kids. And we need to demand everyone to care deeply about our kids,” Michelle said, thinking she was closing on a powerful note, but really just came across looking sore over the issue that nobody really cared about her lunch program as much as she repeatedly told them they should.
Liberals meddle in more than enough and if there’s anything they need to not mess with, it’s other people’s kids and how to raise them. After all, they’re the party of not caring enough about children that they’re willing to kill them in utero if they’re an inconvenience to the “mother.” What also makes Michelle the wrong person to be giving parenting advice is the fact that she hasn’t even been seen with your youngest daughter since leaving the White House.

While Barack and Michelle travel to globe, everyone wonders where their high school-aged daughter is and who she’s being raised by. Michelle certainly isn’t around long enough to monitor her own teen’s meals, let alone be the authoritative person over what other parents feed their kids. The fact that she’s still whining about her platform in a public display of frustration just proves that she’s really humiliated about the failure and not willing to relinquish her influence over others just yet.

In the most asinine news, I have read in decades!

It’s now being reported that a Canadian landlord has been fined $12,000 for entering the home he owns while wearing shoes. The issue seems to be that the tenants who were living there were, of course, disciples of the so-called “Religion of Peace.” The claimed to have been “humiliated” by the home owner’s so-called discretion. So a Canadian tribunal thought it was fair to award the scumbag Muslim renters 12k. Only in Canada!
52-year-old John Alabi from Brampton, who is a Christian, explained how he went above and beyond trying to accommodate the Egyptian-born couple who lived in the apartment for only two months. The foolish renter went on to explain that he just sees everybody as human beings like himself. So because of this, he took them in. He went on to add that they all got along with no issues but that all of a sudden he was branded as a racist. Welcome to the world on anyone here in the states who supports President Trump!

Since Alabi stated he does not have the money to pay this judgment so last week news site Rebel News Service launched a crowdfunding page to help Alabi pay the fine.
Al-Monitor Reports
Egypt’s glaring rights violations once again in global spotlight

An Egyptian court will resume its deliberations May 23 in a long-running, on again, off again human rights case that has placed the country at the center of an international controversy — again.

The controversy revolves around a case that began in 2011 and supposedly ended in 2013, but that Egypt recently resurrected, apparently in response to being roundly criticized by world leaders for new, high-profile human rights violations.

In 2011, the government raided 17 foreign and Egyptian nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Cairo, confiscating their funds, documents and equipment and detaining numerous workers, challenging the NGOs’ right to receive foreign funding.

In 2013, Egypt sentenced 43 people in that case, including 19 Americans, to one to five years in prison.

Jump to March 10, when the European Parliament issued a resolution condemning the human rights situation in Egypt after the killing of Giulio Regeni, a young Italian doctoral student. Six days after the resolution was announced, the Egyptian government decided to renew its investigation into NGO funding and reopened the 2011 investigation, again freezing assets and detaining staff, and issuing a gag order on the media.

The targets of the new investigation include rights activists Gamal Eid, a lawyer, and Hossam Bahgat, a journalist. Both men are NGO founders, and both have had their assets frozen and are not allowed to travel. Human rights observers considered the occurrence a setback and feared a quick escalation in rights violations.

That prompted the European Parliament to issue another, harsher statement March 24 saying, “We are witnessing a mounting pressure on independent Egyptian civil society organisations, in particular human rights organisations and defenders. The recent imposition of travel bans, asset freezes and the summoning of human rights defenders are not in line with Egypt’s commitments to promote and respect human rights and fundamental freedoms as guaranteed by its Constitution and enshrined in the EU-Egypt Association Agreement, which is the basis for our partnership.”

The statement added, “The decision to revive the so-called ‘2011 foreign funding case,’ targeting EU partners who are crucial in the democratic development of Egypt, is of serious concern.” The EU also asked Egypt to “allow the independent functioning of civil society organisations and human rights defenders, free of fear of intimidation.”

That wasn’t the end of the international consternation. On April 20, as the Cairo Criminal Court prepared to address aspects of the cases of Eid and Bahgat, among others, a UN spokesman said UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon would follow closely the legal proceedings in Egypt against the NGOs and “human rights defenders.” The statement underlined a defendant’s right to a fair trial and convenient legal proceedings.

The Egyptian government immediately rejected the UN statement. The Foreign Ministry objected to any intervention in the Egyptian judiciary’s work, especially a few hours before the session was to begin.

Judge Ahmed Abu Zeid, spokesman for the Egyptian Foreign Ministry, said, “The statement is an attempt to target and terrorize the independent Egyptian judiciary, although such words are not in line with the UN’s powers and responsibilities and its constant claim to respect the state of law and the independence of the judiciary.”

The president and first lady just completed their second overseas trip which was arguably even more successful than their impressive first one to the Middle East and parts of Europe. Melania Trump stunned on the world stage once again, looking radiant, elegant, and classy as ever but also forged new relationships with other leaders’ wives and even Russia’s Vladamir Putin, who she sat next to at a G20 Summit dinner. President Trump accomplished more there in just a few days than his predecessor did in two presidential terms. However, the success of this trip ended on a sour note when the couple returned home to a nasty surprise at the White House.

There’s no denying that the Trumps impressed while in Poland where they were welcomed by a massive crowd cheering “U.S.A!” before landing for the G-20 Summit in Germany. It doesn’t matter to liberals what good they accomplished there to make America great again, they were still nitpicked back at home over the most irrelevant and innocuous details. The hate in the homeland was still percolating in their absence, which they got a reminder of shortly after landing on the White House lawn and making a b-line for the White House doors.

The reality that liberals will stop at nothing to seek vengeance for their candidate losing the election months ago, presents itself daily as the vicious left continues violent attacks and even attempted assassinations. On Sunday, Secret Service was forced to shut down the North fence line at the people’s house after what they found outside, not far from where the Trumps were.

Fox 32 Chicago reports:

“The Secret Service investigated a suspicious package outside the White House on Sunday night.”

“The package was near Pennsylvania Avenue and 15th. Agents closed the north fence line of the White House as they investigated. They also closed 15th Street to vehicular traffic.”

At just after 7 p.m. Eastern Time on Sunday, law enforcement personnel were still on the scene investigating the package to determine what it was and if it was a threat, the Secret Service alerted in a Tweet at the time. There’s no amount of security and seriousness that’s too much when it comes to any first family’s safety, but especially the Trumps who are under increased and constant attack by lunatics who feel justified in following through on a deadly threat.
Strangely, hours after the package has been evaluated, no other reports about the outcome of that investigation had been released other than the initial alert of its existence. It was likely determined to not be a threat to the president or anyone at the White House, but that has yet to be publicly stated. In the meantime, this just proves that the Secret Service has their work cut out for them more than any other president in history and not one of them can ever get too comfortable and let their guard down. This is why it was so alarming when one special agent had publicly stated that she wouldn’t “take a bullet” for President Trump, which is her job to do so as his personal detail.

This suspicious package discovery comes just a couple of days after a psychopath showed up at Trump Tower looking for Ivanka Trump and armed with knives.

While the president, first lady, first daughter and her husband are all in Germany, another horrifying try to take one of them out for good was just stopped — this time aimed at Ivanka. Luckily, this deadly degenerate didn’t realize that Ivanka wasn’t home and was overseas where she was safer in this case, despite the thousands of protesters who surround her in Hamburg, Germany.

The Daily Mail reports:

“A man wearing a bulletproof vest and armed with two knives was arrested trying to get into Trump Tower, police say.”

“Authorities say Adames Benitez said that he was a US Senator and wanted to see President Donald Trump’s oldest daughter, Ivanka, when he showed up at Trump Tower around 4pm, the New York Post reported.”

California liberals are at it again, but this time they’re tearing each other apart and it’s glorious to laugh at. The Democratic party has fallen so low since HILLARY LOST and Donald Trump became President of the United States (HOORAY), and to seem them drooling over each other in a fit of rage is just the most beautiful thing in the world since a white plastic bag was caught on film in the movie American Beauty.

It was only a matter of time until the liberals got sick of each other. They must have realized that they can’t rattle the strength and unity of the right wingers, and now they’re just preying on each other like some zombies trying to each other’s brains, but realize there are no brains in those heads of theirs.

The liberals are so bad right now that Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer had to remind everyone that they’re on the same team and they’re all Democrats and it’s time to chill out. I’m shocked no one hit him with a chair or ran an Antifa flag up his backside.

According to Politico:

Stoked by a contested race for state Democratic Party chair and the failure of a single-payer health care bill, activists are staging protests at the Capitol. Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon reported receiving death threats after shelving the health care legislation late last month, and security was tightened at the statehouse after activists disrupted a floor session last week.

They are so brain dead that they are disrupting their own party now? Oh good grief, Charlie Brown. This isn’t the way politics work. If this teaches liberals anything, it’s that THIS is why they lost. They are INTOLERABLE people thick and thin. They’re just impossible to work with. It’s like asking a baby to write a doctorate and they crumple the papers or drool on them while trying to eat it. Nothing at all will get done.

…Establishment Democrats fear the rhetoric and appetite for new spending could go too far, jeopardizing the party’s across-the-board dominance of state politics.
All of it has taken on new significance as California embraces its role as the focal point of the anti-Trump resistance.

The rest of the country laughs at California. I’m not sure if their residents read anything beyond their own local news, but there’s a large portion of the country that thinks California is a joke, they need to Cal-Exit, and their Democrats and liberals are the laughing stock at the bottom of the barrel. If you want to see America’s worst, then look in California. Everything from the resist people to the Democrat lawmakers is just sad (say that in a Trump voice).

These folks don’t realize that a lot of the people who voted for Trump really voted for him so they could stick a fork in the whiny Democrats. A lot of people could care less who the President is, they just wanted ANYONE but Hillary and the Democrats. They wanted ANYONE but the gender confused creeps of the left. To see Democrats fighting each other is nothing less than amazing.

Progressive assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer has urged the party that they should not be “fighting one another” and “tear the party apart”–reminding Democrats they are on the same team.

Progressive Californian legislators have hailed themselves as “a fortress of the opposition” to Trump’s presidency.

When Reggie Jones-Sawyer has to calm you down, then you know you’ve messed up. When you need to be reminded that you’re on the same team, then that means your team is not on the same page. I think we’ve known that for quite some time.

They’ve attempted to pass high-profile legislation “to deny the new president on climate change and immigration.”

People want to deny the President on immigration? Agents just busted illegal immigrants with tons of drugs disguised as lettuce. And if you’re serious about climate change and global warming, then you should know a recent global warming study was recently canceled because there was TOO MUCH ICE!

Though they have been successful on some accounts, “liberal activists have fallen short in other areas, unsettling progressives across the country who view California as a state in which they should be racking up wins.”

Liberal activists are falling short because people are seeing what liberals really are and they don’t like it. Liberals have become violent, intolerant, and incapable people.

If there’s a bigger civil war, beyond the great meme war between Donald Trump and CNN, then liberals are in a huge amount of trouble.

Some kids want to be doctors, plumbers, or firetrucks when they grow up. Other kids want to join ISIS and jihad people. Both are fine, because who are we to tell kids they can’t be something? We’re already in the time of forcing kids to be the opposite gender, or genderless, and why stop there? Why not breed little jihadists too!

Such is the case as this Muslim boy grew up to later pledge allegiance to ISIS. He was caught and the system came down hard on him. A young fella like this pays a brutal price because they were brainwashed into doing something that would ultimately ruin their life one way or the other.

20-year-old Aron Travis Daniels plead guilty for attempting to give material support to the Islamic state. He was later busted by an undercover agent posing as an IS recruiter.

According to the Department of Justice, Daniels, 20, attempted to make contact with people to join Islamic State beginning in September 2015. He sent e-mails to people not named in the FBI’s criminal complaint “seeking assistance in traveling to Syria to conduct violent jihad and expressed a desire to stop the Russian-Iranian ‘onslaught of our people.’”

In some of these emails, Daniels said he would need financial assistance to travel to Syria “to do jihad.”

Didn’t Linda Sarsour recently use the word “jihad” and liberals tried to play it off like it’s not a violent word? I believe they did and she did. So this guy wants to travel across the planet to do bad things to people because he believes that’s the right thing to do? What about staying in America and making a nice life for himself and not getting caught up in the violence? He can hook up with 72 girls here, with a small potential for maybe one of them to be a virgin, instead of risking his life to do violent things on the notion that he might get 72 virgins in the afterlife.

After three months of occasional emails to people he believed were jihadists, Daniels sent $250 via Western Union to a person in Libya he believed was an intermediary to an Islamic State recruiter.
After sending the money, an undercover FBI informant posing as an Islamic State recruiter came into contact with Daniels. When the informant asked Daniels what he had done to prove his allegiance to Islamic State, Daniels said he sent $250.

Can you imagine Chris Hansen was an ISIS recruiter? The guy walks in with a weapon, cheap booze, and an ISIS impersonator says they’re going to change into something more comfortable, then Chris Hansen pops his head out and tells the recruit to “have a seat” and starts reading naughty jihad messages like “are you sure you didn’t say you want to rip the spinal cord from a goat and shove it in the eye of a homeless person?”

Only in a perfectly strange comedy, right?

In conversations between Daniels and the informant, Daniels asked for advice on how to join Islamic State and how he could get to certain Islamic State-controlled areas.

Why would anyone want to go there? It’s violent. There are no all-inclusive hotels. The food is usually dusty from the windy sandy areas. It’s just not on the top 5 places to visit in anyone’s Groupon app. I can’t see Yelp having good reviews for the Islamic State-controlled areas.

What’s wrong with staying in America and living your life? One does not have to join ISIS just because they’re Muslim. Everyone has options and choices to make in life. Choosing to stay in America, work hard, earn a living, and enjoy yourself is an OK choice to make.

I feel bad that a guy who is only 20 has thrown his life away for a cause that may not ever appreciate anything he did. You have to wonder what went wrong in his life that would make him feel this way. Why would someone feel compelled to join ISIS and do jihad? What would make him actually follow through with the feelings of doing harm to others? Instead of locking him up, they should study him and try to understand the process of people who go from living a normal life to joining ISIS.

Maybe Michael Moore can put down the double bacon cheeseburgers and make a documentary called “The Road To Jihad.”

It’s always nauseating to witness Hollywood elites spout off from their ivory towers about issues that plague normal people, all while living untouched from reality in their little bubbles. These morons sincerely believe their “struggles” are real, and just because they have money and fame, their opinions are automatically more important that everyone else’s. Now rabid liberal and actress Gwyneth Paltrow is being forced to face the rage of a seasoned Green Beret Soldier, after daring to compare her life on social media to the life of combat faced by our military.
Several weeks ago, Paltrow made the asinine comparison to reading “mean tweets” on the internet to facing combat as a soldier, but quickly realized that opening her fat mouth about topics she can’t remotely even comprehend was an enormous mistake. U.S. Special Forces veteran and Purple Heart recipient Bryan Sikes was quick to put the spoiled actress in her place, proving that just because you’re an elitist moron and you shriek the loudest, doesn’t mean you speak for all Americans. Here’s what Sikes had to say about Paltrow comparing her life on social media to the life of military combat, that will leave you cheering.
To Miss Paltrow,

I’d first like to start out by saying how terrible I feel for you and all your friends that on a daily basis have to endure mean words written by people you don’t know. I can only imagine the difficulty of waking up in a 12,000 square foot Hollywood home and having your assistant retrieve your iPhone, only to see that the battery is low and someone on twitter (the social media concept that you and all of your friends contribute to on an hourly basis to feed your ego and narcissistic ways), has written a mean word or 2 about you. You’ve hit the nail on the head, war is exactly like that. You should receive a medal for the burden you have carried on your shoulders due to these meanies on social media.

You said, “Its almost like, how in war, you go through this bloody dehumanizing thing and then something is defined out of it.” I could see how you, and others like you in “the biz”, could be so insecure and mentally weak that you could pair the difficulty of your life on twitter to my brothers who have had their limbs ripped off and seen their friends shot, blown up, burned and disfigured, or wake up every morning in pain – while just starting the day is a challenge. How about our wives? The ones that sign on to be there for us through thick and thin, that help us to shake the hardships of war upon our return? And do all this while being mothers to our kids, keeping bills in order because we are always gone, and keeping our lives glued together. They do all this, by the way, without a team of accountants, nanny’s, personal assistants, and life coaches. Yeah, reading a mean tweet is just like all that.
You know what is really “dehumanizing”, Miss Paltrow? The fact that you’d even consider that your life as an “A-list” celebrity reading internet comments could even compare to war and what is endured on the battlefield. You and the other “A-listers” that think like you are laughable. You all have actually convinced yourselves that you in some way face difficulty on a regular basis. Let me be the first to burst your bubble: a long line at Starbucks, your driver being 3 minutes late, a scuff mark on your $1200 shoes and a mean tweet do not constitute difficulty in the eyes of a soldier.

Understand me when I say this: war does not define me. It is a chapter in my life that helped shaped me. Being a husband and father is what defines me. Remember, sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never…be close to what war is.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is calling on Republican Senate leaders to introduce several important changes to their plan to replace Obamacare, including one very unique reform idea that has the potential to dramatically change the U.S. health care system.

Paul is one of several conservative Republicans in the Senate who say they can’t vote in favor of the Senate leadership’s proposal to replace the Affordable Care Act — the Better Care Reconciliation Act — in its current form. According to Paul and other conservatives, including Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), the BCRA keeps too many of the problematic provisions in the Obama-era ACA in place.

On June 27, Paul sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) urging him to adopt several important reform ideas. Among them was the expansion of “Association Health Plans” in the BCRA. The expansion of AHPs would allow organizations and individuals to form associations for the purpose of buying group health insurance. Existing associations could also buy health insurance in this way, significantly increasing the power of consumers in negotiating rates and helping to resolve problems related to the ACA’s pre-existing conditions clause.

In his letter to McConnel, Paul wrote that he wants “the language [in the BCRA to] be changed to allow any individual, including self-employed individuals, to form associations for the purpose of purchasing group health insurance.”

If passed into law, Paul’s proposal would have far-reaching implications for the U.S. health care market. Under the current system, most Americans are insured through either a family member, an employer or the government. Those who work for small businesses that don’t offer insurance and individuals who are uninsured for some other reason have been required to buy insurance as individuals. This has given them significantly less negotiating power than the power enjoyed by large employers when negotiating rates, and prior to the passage of Obamacare, it put people who did not have employer-provided health insurance but were suffering with a pre-existing health condition at a significant disadvantage.

Since Obamacare was implemented, individuals with pre-existing conditions have been able to purchase health insurance, but health insurance prices have skyrocketed as a result, exacerbated by the fact many health individuals have chosen to pay the Obamacare penalty for not having insurance rather than pay for increasingly expensive health insurance plans that have gigantic deductibles.

Many free-market health care experts believe Paul’s plan for association health plans would go a long way toward resolving these problems, because individuals could purchase health insurance together. The larger the group, the more powerful it would become in negotiating prices, and the less the pre-existing conditions of some of its members would matter. This is precisely why, along with tax advantages, large-employer health insurance plans are so attractive to many employees.

Imagine, for instance, the advantages of receiving your health insurance through your church, rather than an employer. Wealthier families in the church could help subsidize the cost of insurance for the lower-income families without the government getting involved, insurance rates would be cheaper than if an individual were to seek health insurance on his or her own, the church could ensure that the health insurance policies purchased are in line with the congregation’s religious beliefs and people who lose their jobs or switch their employers would no longer need to find a new insurance plan. The same could be true for almost any association of like-minded people, including groups like the National Rifle Association and retirement organizations.

News as we know it has changed extensively since Donald Trump decided to run for president and won. CNN has been leading the charge against the Commander-in-Chief ever since, in a desperate effort to take him down and America too. At one point, the network was comprised of respectable journalists who took their job seriously but now these despots have devolved into doing whatever it takes to destroy our president and anyone who supports him as they do Democrats’ dirty work. They’ve suffered a total loss of credibility for doing so and now triple amputee war veteran, Senior Airman Brian Kolfage Jr., has just issued the final blow to what was left of their reputation with a massive ‘F You’ they rightfully earned.

CNN has slipped into a new and dangerous realm of false news reporting over the last couple of years which is aimed at slandering the president and deepen the divide in the country. Donald Trump isn’t afraid to call them out for being fake news as he understands that they aren’t just working against him, but the progress of this country and his mission to make America great again. The fake news network has gotten away with masquerading as a reliable source of truth and authentic reporting for too long, but now the world is aware that they can’t be trusted and for that, they were just given a new web address for their website which is better suited for their new resolve of delivering fake news to the masses.

Brian Kolfage Jr. didn’t just fight and sacrifice for our country, he lost three limbs in war and now lives with the daily reminder of the price paid for our freedom. This includes defending the right of the First Amendment that each one of us enjoys, which those at CNN use and abuse to disrespect our president and divide our nation. Kolfage has good reason to take personal offence to this given his great sacrifice and since they won’t stop, he’s provided them with a new way of getting to their website, which sends a clear message of what’s really real.

On his Facebook page, Kolfage announced CNN’s new web address created to fight against the fake news they repeatedly report.

Rather than entering CNN.com to get to their site, citizens can enter in FakeAss.news to take them to it and get what they will really find there – news that the network can’t find on Trump to report, so they simply make it up.

“CNN would rather see Trump fail than America succeed,” Kolfage wrote in his online message. “They are the enemy of all Americans because they put their agenda first, instead of the American people. And for that, I’ve now given CNN a new web domain. You can visit their site by typing http://www.FakeAss.News in your web address bar”

“Please share this everywhere!”
The fitting new URL takes users straight to CNN’s actual site where you can find all the fake news they become known for, as President Trump routinely points out. The timing of this new domain couldn’t have been better since it’s now come out that CNN deceit goes deeper than we all thought.

InfoWars reports:

“CNN is refusing to respond to claims that it hired a correspondent who worked and sympathized with Al-Qaeda jihadists in Syria.”

“Left-wing website Alternet documents how ‘Star CNN correspondent Clarissa Ward worked with al-Qaeda ‘media man’ Bilal Abdul Kareem to gain access to her “heroes on the ground’.”

“While doing coverage for CNN’s Undercover in Syria show, Ward visited the Al-Nusra held areas of eastern Aleppo and Idlib and confirmed with the local sharia dress code by wearing a full black niqab.”

“Jabhat al-Nusra is an Al-Qaeda offshoot that is officially listed as a terrorist organization by the United States government.”

“The article also details how CNN deliberately tried to downplay Bilal Abdul Kareem’s role in providing full access to Ward, presumably to obfuscate the fact that he is a mouthpiece for terrorists.”
What’s worse is that in her reporting, Ward allegedly referred to the terrorists as “heroes on the ground” in Syria, despite acknowledging that they are also “carrying out atrocities” on the people there. These statements seem to show her public support for terrorists while working for an American news network who refuses to respond when questioned about it.

Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that “Television Trump” is very different from the real President Trump.

“As I see it, Television Trump is very different from the real person,” Putin said Saturday at a press conference. “He is absolutely concrete, absolutely adequately perceives the interlocutor, quite quickly analyzes, answers questions or draws from the discussions some new elements.

“As regards personal relations, I think they are established,” the Russian president stated.

The two world leaders met for the first time at the three-day G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany. Their meeting spread to two and a half hours instead of the planned half hour.

Russia’s meddling in the U.S. presidential election was not resolved in the meeting, but the presidents did agree upon a cease-fire in Syria.

Afterwards, the Russian foreign minister asserted that Trump had accepted Putin’s denial of election interference, a claim the White House pushed back on.

“There is no basis to believe that Russia interfered in the electoral process of the United States,” Putin said.

Another campaign promise on the verge of being kept by our new president!

While President Donald Trump has been having a stellar showing abroad at the G20 Summit. Attorney General Jeff Sessions along with his deputy, Rod Rosenstein, and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats took the time to visit the Guantanamo Bay prison camp at the US naval base on the island of Cuba.
Between 2009 and 2017 the Guantanamo prison has been running basically on a kind of autopilot mode since the executive order from former President Barack Hussein Obama calling for the facility to be shut down is still technically the law of the land. But because President Trump is a true American who cares about our nation’s security and the well-being of out citizens over all else, he promised during the campaign to fill it to capacity again.
Sessions ended his visit by saying that the prison is a “very fine place” where there is no legal reason not to send new detainees there.

The Guardian Reports:
Obama signs order to close Guantánamo Bay
Thursday 22 January 2009 12.20 EST

Prison that symbolizes George Bush’s ‘war on terror’ will be shut down, accompanied by ban on torture and review of military trials

Barack Obama has signed an executive order to shut down the US military prison at Guantánamo Bay – the most potent symbol of excess in George Bush’s “war on terror”.

The new US president signed two other executive orders to review the use of military trials for terror suspects and ban the harshest interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding.

The three executive orders – on the second day of the new administration – showed that Obama was determined to move swiftly to implement some of his key campaign pledges. Administration staff applauded at the signing ceremony in the Oval Office.

“The message that we are sending around the world is that the United States intends to prosecute the ongoing struggle against violence and terrorism and we are going to do so vigilantly,” Obama said. “We are going to do so effectively and we are going to do so in a manner that is consistent with our values and our ideals.”

A draft copy of the order said: “In view of significant concerns raised by these detentions, both within the United States and internationally, prompt and appropriate disposition of the individuals currently detained at Guantánamo and closure of the facility would further the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and the interests of justice.”

An estimated 245 men are being held at Guantánamo, a US naval base in Cuba. Most have been locked up for years without being charged with a crime. Obama’s plans to review military trials of terror suspects and end harsh interrogations were being assembled even before he won the election in November.

The UN’s torture investigator, Manfred Nowak, welcomed the move and said freed inmates should be allowed to sue the US if they had been mistreated. “Justice also means to look into the past,” Nowak told the Associated Press. Nowak has previously said he has reliable accounts of torture at Guantánamo. Lawyers for two inmates, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri and Mohammed Jawad, have said their clients were tortured.

In Saudi Arabia, families of the country’s 13 remaining Guantánamo detainees rejoiced at the news.

“That was a humane decision. We’re very optimistic,” said Ali al-Sayari, whose son Abdullah, 28, has been there for eight years. The family has not heard from or about him for the past two years.

“Obama is correcting the mistakes of his predecessor,” said Ali al-Shamrani, whose nephew Mohammed al-Shamrani has been in Guantánamo for eight years.

Obama’s nominee to be the director of national intelligence is set to tell Congress there will be no torture, harsh interrogations or wiretaps without warrants under his command.

The left coast, land of green peace and home of hippies have once again decided that it wants to selectively get on board with states rights and overrule the constitution. The people who would be the first to say that the individual rights can’t be extended to individuals who want to decide whether to support homosexual weddings, want to say that they can individually decide when someone should have a second amendment right to firearms.

Different states have differing laws about when police can confiscate firearms when called to a scene of violence, but the one thing that most have in common is that it’s always done by an outside party who has the chance to see the alleged attacker and can assess the immediate risk. Also, they confiscate all of the available firearms that can be used to cause immediate danger.

Oregon has now decided that they’d like to give the courts and whoever wants to bring an accusation against an individual the rights to not only confiscate the weapons of someone who’s not an imminent threat, but they want to take their ability to concealed carry as well. If that idea is at all concerning to you, read on.

Via Breitbart News:
“Oregon lawmakers passed legislation co-sponsored by Sen. Brian Boquist (R-Dallas) that allows a judge to issue an ex parte ruling for the confiscation of an individual’s firearms.
The bill is SB 719, and it has now passed Oregon’s House and Senate. It creates an Extreme Risk Protection Order, which forces the subject of the order to hand over all firearms, as well as his concealed carry permit if he possesses one.”

I’m not sure where Boquist gets off calling himself a Republican, sponsoring a bill like that, but apparently, he’s a man with a plan, and for some reason that includes deciding the Founding Father’s second amendment is outdated.
On the 6th of this month NRA-ILA reported on the issue:

“Senate Bill 719A has been scheduled for a House floor vote today. SB 719A was passed out of committee on Monday without a public hearing and with only one hour notice of the work session. It’s imperative that you contact your state Representative immediately and urge them to oppose SB 719A!
Based on a California law enacted in 2014, SB 719A would create a so-called ‘Extreme Risk Protection Order’ (ERPO) that could be obtained by a law enforcement officer, family member, or household member in an ex parte hearing to deprive someone of their Second Amendment rights without due process of the law.

It’s always hilarious to watch the reaction of liberals whenever a Muslim goes on a mass killing spree in the name of Islam. Even if the Muslim screams “allahu akbar,” in the final moments of his life, liberals will always claim the killer had no relationship to Islam, while condemning everyone as “racists” and “bigots” who speak out about the terror attack. As the unapologetic love affair between liberals and Muslim terrorists continue, it looks like the game is finally up for liberals continuing to assert that Islam is a “religion of peace” after what a popular FM Muslim radio station just accidentally broadcast for over 25 hours straight across America’s airwaves.

Muslims around the world have an intricate plan for taking down the west, but they understand fully that all of them can’t just go in with all their guns blazing at once. While terror attacks are apart part of the plan, they know that to invade and conquer western societies they must utilize the “civilization-jihadist” process, and actively destroy civilized countries from within. By utilizing the Islamic tactics of taqiyya and muruna, Muslims will pretend to be peaceful while deceiving us of their true intentions, while seamlessly infiltrating our courts and schools with Sharia.

As liberals across America and throughout the world still cling to the fallacy that Islam is a “religion of peace,” looks like leftists will have a hard time explaining why a “peaceful” Muslim FM station accidentally broadcast 25 hours from Muslim hate preacher Anwar Al-Awlaki, where his sermons amounted to a “direct call of action” across the Muslim community, instructing them to take “violent action” against all non-Muslims in the United States. The Daily Mail has more:

A Muslim radio station broadcast lectures by an Al Qaeda terror leader calling for holy war.

Iman FM transmitted 25 hours of sermons from Anwar Al-Awlaki, a hate preacher killed by a US drone strike in 2011.

A complaint was made to Ofcom, which has suspended the Sheffield-based station’s licence.

The watchdog said the material ‘amounted to a direct call to action to members of the Muslim community to prepare for and carry out violent action against non-Muslim people’.
Bosses at Iman FM have 21 days to explain themselves or be closed down. They found the extremist lectures on YouTube and broadcast them during Ramadan.

Ofcom said Al-Awlaki, who was an American Muslim cleric of Yemeni descent, was an Al Qaeda leader, recruiter and trainer.

He is said to have inspired the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris, an attempt to blow up an American airliner and the massacre of 13 people at Fort Hood in Texas.

The lectures were broadcast in English on June 14. In one, Al-Awlaki said: “Prepare whatever strength you have for holy war in the cause of Allah. This is a form of worship.”

Under broadcasting rules hate speech must not be included in TV or radio programs except where justified by context.

Iman FM claimed to be unaware of the preacher’s background and said not all the material was checked before being aired.

The Ofcom ruling described this defense as ‘not credible’.

Mohammad Mughal, the station’s chief executive, said: ‘This is very, very sad because none of us had any idea this lecture was preaching hatred.

‘We are not just a Muslim radio station – we regularly feature Christian presenters.’

It’s time that people in America wake the hell up to what is happening underneath our noses. We are actively being invaded thanks to the reckless antics of liberals who keep advocating for the very same group of people who have sworn to kill us. Regardless of the various factions of Islam, be it Al Qaeda, ISIS, or the Taliban, they all have the same goal, which is to come together in order to create a global caliphate. As countries across Europe are being infested with Muslim “refugees” with Sharia no-go zones are now becoming a common part of the landscape, America within a very short amount of time will be the only remaining stronghold against Islam, as experts predict that in 10 years Europe will be completely ruled by Sharia Law.

President Trump accused former FBI director James B. Comey of illegally leaking classified information to the media, part of an angry, early morning tweet storm Monday as the president faces new allegations about his 2016 campaign’s contact with the Russians.

“James Comey leaked CLASSIFIED INFORMATION to the media,” Trump wrote, referring to the FBI director he fired in May. “That is so illegal!”
Testifying before Congress last month, Comey revealed that a tweet by the president — incorrectly suggesting he may have had taped his conversations with Comey — prompted the former FBI director to ask a close friend to leak to the news media private memos he had kept recounting his interactions with Trump.

The president also used Twitter to push out several a “Fox & Friends” clips Monday morning, including one accusing Comey of having his friend leak top secret information, and another accusing the media of not representing half of the country.

And later in the morning, he retweeted a missive by Fox News host Sean Hannity, which attacked Hillary Clinton, seeming to refer to her private email server as secretary of state and saying, “HRC mishandles and destroys classified info-NO PROBLEM!”

Trump’s frustrated, frenzied tweets — at times, he basically seemed to be live-tweeting “Fox & Friends” — came amid reports in the New York Times this weekend that the president’s oldest son, Donald Trump Jr. — as well as his son-in-law Jared Kushner and former campaign manager Paul J. Manafort — met with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties during the 2016 campaign, after being promised damaging information on Clinton.

The president then urged lawmakers to pass legislation to repeal and replace President Obama’s signature health-care bill before leaving for the August recess.

“I cannot imagine that Congress would dare to leave Washington without a beautiful new HealthCare bill fully approved and ready to go!” he wrote.
Senate Republicans left for the July 4 holiday after failing to hold a vote on Republican heath-care legislation. The White House has signaled that if Republicans cannot successfully pass a new health-care plan, the administration will pressure lawmakers to simply repeal the current health-care law — and then, possibly, work with Democrats to write replacement legislation.

Later, Trump’s tweets veered in an entirely different direction: defending his daughter Ivanka, who prompted international backlash at the Group of 20 summit on Saturday when she briefly filled in for her father at a table of world leaders when he left the room.

“When I left Conference Room for short meetings with Japan and other countries, I asked Ivanka to hold seat,” Trump wrote. “Very standard. Angela M agrees!”

Trump asserted that if Chelsea Clinton had been a similar situation, the reaction from the media would have been calls for Chelsea herself to run for president.

“If Chelsea Clinton were asked to hold the seat for her mother, as her mother gave our country away, the Fake News would say CHELSEA FOR PRES!” Trump wrote.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel — or “Angela M” in Trump parlance — earlier this year hosted Ivanka at a summit focused on women empowerment in Berlin, and did defend the president’s daughter to reporters.

First Daughter Ivanka Trump, an unpaid adviser to her father, President Donald Trump, created a media firestorm when she briefly took dad’s seat during a working meeting of top world leaders at the G-20 summit in Hamburg, Germany.

Members of the liberal media and others went into full meltdown mode — real or contrived. Frankly, it’s hard to tell, these days:

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the host of the summit, defended Ivanka’s brief seat at the table, saying “it was in line with what other delegations do.”

Nonetheless, the feeding frenzy continued.

Monday morning, being the proud father Donald Trump is — and also being Donald Trump — not only defended his daughter, but landed a strong shot at the Clintons and the media in the process:

Donald J. Trump:
When I left Conference Room for short meetings with Japan and other countries, I asked Ivanka to hold seat. Very standard. Angela M agrees!
Any “self-respecting” member of the liberal media would be denying his or her “progressive” stripes to claim otherwise, would they not?

Less than an hour later, Chelsea shot back:
Good morning Mr. President. It would never have occurred to my mother or my father to ask me. Were you giving our country away? Hoping not.
I’ll take this one.

Chelsea, have you not been aware of the near-constant adulation heaped on you by the liberal media? As was the case with your mother in 2008 — until Barack Obama came along — then again in 2016, they have all but anointed you as the next Clinton president. You know, that “Clinton dynasty” thing.

A federal judge sentenced one of the 234 people arrested during rioting in Washington, D.C. on Inauguration Day to prison. The defendant admitted he joined with 200 others to form a “Black Bloc” wearing black, gloves, scarves, ski masks, gas masks, and goggles to conceal their identities. He also carried a black flag, a hammer, and a gas mask. He is the first to be sentenced in connection with the riots.
A statement signed by 31-year-old Dane Powell said that others with the “Black Bloc” at Logan Circle wore sunglasses, helmets, hoodies, “and other face-concealing and face-protecting items to conceal their identities to prevent law enforcement from being able to identify the individual perpetrators of violence or property damage.”

The statement obtained by Breitbart Texas from the DOJ’s U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Columbia Division, also said that the rioters traveled over approximately 16 city blocks during a period of more than 30 minutes. The Black Bloc army carried hammers, crowbars, wooden sticks, and other weapons.

Dane Powell admitted that he helped break windows at two businesses and to “throwing a brick, large rock, or piece of concrete at uniformed law enforcement officers during the riot.”

Breitbart News reported in January that the rioters got about a mile from the White House. The article describes the damage reported and the actions of the mob. It also noted that “as shown in the Stephen K. Bannon film Occupy Unmasked, the Black Bloc anarchists are closely aligned with the Occupy Wall Street movement.”

The gathering of “anarchist, socialist and communist groups” for an event called “DisruptJ20” called for Black Bloc protesters to come to Logan Circle in Washington, D.C. on Inauguration Day. The article said, “its distinctive dress is to allow protesters to break the law” and its leftist “anti-American” ideology and its goals are not to be underestimated.

After the arrests of the protesters, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) countered in June suing “1-150” Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers, “1-20” supervisory MPD officers, and MPD Police Chief Peter Newsham in their individual capacities (#1:17-cv-01216-ABJ).

The federal complaint for damages begins with the statement that people came from all over the country to take to the streets to exercise their constitutional right to freedom of speech and assembly “to express their disapproval of [President Donald Trump’s] policies.” The ACLU lawyers add, “Journalists came to report on the demonstrations. Legal observers came to document any violations of the demonstrators’ legal rights.”

The ACLU complains of tear gas and pepper spray being used by the officers, and about three of the plaintiffs allegedly being denied food, water and access to a toilet for 7 to 16 hours, tight handcuffs, and that two of the plaintiffs “were subjected to intrusive, humiliating, and unjustified manual rectal probing and grabbing of their testicles.”

On Friday, Dane Powell was sentenced to 36 months in prison as his supporters, and the supporters of police officers took up all the seats in the courtroom and 20 seats in a second courtroom, reported the Tampa Bay Times, the defendant’s home town newspaper. The judge suspended all but four months of the sentence on the condition that he successfully complete two years of supervised probation. Powell was immediately taken into custody.

Dane Powell was choking with emotion when he asked Judge Lynn Leibovitz of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for leniency. The Tampa Bay Times reported that he urged, “I stand before you today asking for forgiveness for anyone who was scared, hurt or felt threatened by me on that day.”

An assistant U.S. attorney played a 10-minute video and accused Powell of throwing bricks and rocks at peace officers and breaking the windows of stores. His eyes were exposed although he was dressed in black and he had his face covered. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Kerkhoff told the judge that Powell was seen the day before in Logan Circle carrying the same flag, a hammer, and gas masks. “He came to the District of Columbia to engage in violence by hiding his face, throwing rocks and running. He’s a violent coward,” she argued, the Times reported.

The government lawyer also charged that one of the police officers during the riots was knocked unconscious with a brick or large rock, but there was no evidence that Powell struck that officer.

Powell’s defense lawyer said her client, a U.S. Army veteran, came to Washington because he was “worried about the direction of this country” but he admitted he got “carried away.”

Powell pleaded guilty in late April to the charges of felony rioting and felony assault on a peace officer. He had faced 14 charges.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has come to the defense of Ivanka Trump after outcry over Ivanka briefly filling in for her father, President Donald Trump, at a G20 summit event in Hamburg, Germany, last week.

When a picture showing Ivanka filling in for Trump during a meeting at the G20 summit surfaced Saturday, people lost their minds — and the move was even compared to something that happens in dictatorships.
The picture caused outrage because it showed Ivanka sitting with British Prime Minister Theresa May and Chinese President Xi Jinping. May and Jinping are world leaders, while Ivanka is only an adviser to her father.

To set the record straight, Ivanka didn’t sit in on an important economic or military panel. Instead, Ivanka only joined the world leaders when the president of the World Bank spoke about a women’s entrepreneurship fund that Ivanka spearheaded with the World Bank. Otherwise, Ivanka was sitting at the back of the room, according to a White House statement.

“Ivanka was sitting in the back and then briefly joined the main table when the president had to step out,” a White House official said.

But even if Ivanka had sat at the main table during other discussions, according to Merkel, who served as host of this year’s summit, it wouldn’t have made a difference.

“Ivanka Trump belonged to the American delegation, so that is in line with what other delegations do. And it is known that she works at the White House and carries responsibility for certain initiatives,” Merkel told reporters Saturday, according to The Associated Press.

Last year, then-president Barack Obama vetoed a bill that would have curbed the pensions of former presidents if they took outside income of $400,000 or more.

So now that former president Barack Obama has decided to accept $400,000 for an upcoming Wall Street speech, the sponsors of that bill say they’ll reintroduce that bill in hopes that President Trump will sign it.

“The Obama hypocrisy on this issue is revealing,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and sponsor of the 2016 bill. “His veto was very self-serving.”

Chaffetz and Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, the sponsor of the companion Senate bill, say they will re-introduce the Presidential Allowance Modernization Act this month. The bill would cap presidential pensions at $200,000, with another $200,000 for expenses. But those payments would be reduced dollar-for-dollar once their outside income exceeds $400,000.

The issue isn’t a partisan one — or at least, it wasn’t last year. The bill passed both the House and Senate with no opposition, and no veto threat had come from the White House.

So when Obama’s veto came one Friday night last July — on the last day for him to sign or veto the legislation — it took lawmakers by surprise. It was the 11th of Obama’s 12 vetoes.

At the time, Obama argued that the bill would have “unintended consequences” and “impose onerous and unreasonable burdens” on former presidents by requiring them to immediately lay off staff and find new office space.

Republican leaders did not call up the bill for a veto override, which would have required a two-thirds majority in both chambers.

Democrats say they won’t necessarily oppose changes.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the top Democrat on Chaffetz’s committee, was a co-sponsor of the original bill. “Cummings definitely supports the concept, and if we can work out the technical issues with the bill that arose late in the last Congress, we expect he would strongly support it again,” said spokeswoman Jennifer Hoffman Werner.

Trump has not taken a position on the legislation. But during the campaign, he said he’d take a close look at pensions for elected officials — especially members of Congress.

“The first thing I’m going to do is tell you that if I’m elected president, I’m accepting no salary, OK?” he said at a town hall in 2015. “They get benefits that nobody else can even think about, OK. And they don’t like to talk about it. But we’ll work on that.”

Under the Former Presidents Act, the nation’s five living former presidents — Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama — get a pension equal to the salary of a current cabinet secretary: $207,800 in 2017. They also get $150,000 to pay staff, and “suitable office space, appropriately furnished and equipped.”

In 2015, the entire benefit package ranged from $430,000 for Carter to $1.1 million for George W. Bush.

With Obama joining the club as of Jan. 20, the 2017 spending bill approved by the House Wednesday contained nearly $3.9 million for all the former presidents through Sept. 30 — a $588,000 annual increase.

Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said the former president had no comment on the legislation.

Obama has already shown he has considerable potential to raise money in his post-presidential career. He and his wife Michelle have signed a publishing deal for two separate books, which the Financial Times reported was worth at least $65 million. And the Wall Street speech — a health care conference planned by investment firm Cantor Fitzgerald in September — will reportedly net him another $400,000.

“President Obama will deliver speeches from time to time,” said Eric Schultz, a former White House spokesman who continues to advise Obama. “Some of those speeches will be paid, some will be unpaid, and regardless of venue or sponsor, President Obama will be true to his values, his vision, and his record.”

Obama has said he also plans to use his post-presidency to work on a range of issues through his presidential center in Chicago. On Wednesday, he unveiled the design of that center and said he would donate $2 million to a summer jobs program for Chicago youth.

A spokesman for President George H.W. Bush said he does not oppose changes to the law, and expects that Congress will likely take some action.

On the first day of Barack Obama’s presidency, he promised that he would close the terrorist prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. However, 8 years later the prison still remains open even though most of the prisoners have been released back into the population with disastrous consquences.

Brack Obama did all he could to release these disgusting terrorists and do what he could to make their lives better too. If it was not banning pork of prison menu’s it was releasing Muslim extremists back to the battlefield to fight against American troops. The prison was almost emptied out completely, but it appears that it will not be for long.

President Trump has made no secret that he planned on utilizing GITMO once he was president. And, like all promises Trump makes he intends on keeping this one as well. It appears that Trump is signaling that he will be filling the terrorist prison once again.
Here is more from The Hill:

The Trump administration appears to be making its first moves toward fulfilling a campaign promise to fill the Guantanamo Bay prison camp with “bad dudes.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein visited the prison on Friday to get an update on current operations, the first concrete action the administration has taken on the facility since taking office.

Up until now, Guantanamo has been running on autopilot; the executive order from former President Obama calling for the facility to be shut down is still technically the law of the land.

But President Trump promised during the campaign to “load it up with some bad dudes,” and Sessions has called it a “very fine place” with no legal reason not to send new detainees there.

Supporters of keeping the facility open and sending new detainees there are confident Trump will fulfill that promise, even if little movement has been made.

“We have taken off the table the silly ideas that the previous administration had about Guantanamo,” said David Rivkin, constitutional litigator and a fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who served under Presidents Reagan and George H. W. Bush in the White House counsel’s office and the Justice Department.

Obama, having failed in his efforts to close the facility, left Guantanamo with 41 detainees. Five of those detainees were cleared for transfer by either the interagency Guantanamo Review Task Force set up in 2009 or the interagency Periodic Review Boards set up in 2011.

Shortly after Trump’s inauguration, various draft executive orders floated around Washington that would have moved to fulfill Trump campaign promise to begin sending new prisoners to the facility.

The orders would have revoked Obama’s executive order and suspended any existing transfer efforts pending a new review. They also would have called for the continued operation of Guantanamo to hold and try members of al Qaeda, the Taliban and “associated forces,” including the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

But no such orders have been signed.
Of course, the left is already screaming about human rights violations, but do not care about the lives these terrorists have taken. Unlike Obama who believed that incarcerating terrorists would only create more terrorists, Trump has a much more logical approach. And, that is to keep these dangerous individuals locked up so that they cannot harm anyone else.

Obama has had an extremely difficult time relinquishing the power he was held as president of the Untied States, as he’s spent every waking moment in recent months obsessing on ways to take out President Trump with his “resistance movement.” Over the past week Obama’s jealousy was on full display while Trump was in Germany for the G-20 Summit meeting, where Obama was caught breaking federal law to hold a secret meeting with the South Korean president. Now in an effort to up his game of subversion against President Trump, Obama has just abruptly ended his international vacation to fly back to Washington D.C. for another meeting cloaked in secrecy, proving yet again just how far he’s willing to go in order to get President Trump removed from office.

Obama’s antics over the past week in order to sabotage President Trump have been nothing short of startling. We reported several days ago how Obama secretly met with South Korean President Moon ae-in last week in order to discuss “dealing with Trump” for over 40 minutes, which was a straight up act of illegal subversion on Obama’s part. As Obama was busy parading around and pretending to still be president of the United States, he missed the fact that holding a diplomatic foreign meeting as a civilian is a direct violation of the Logan Act, and a serious federal crime. But unfortunately for President Trump, Obama was just getting warmed up with his plans to get rid of Trump for good.
What’s hilarious is that no matter what Obama and his band of Democratic cronies do to take down Trump, their plans keep imploding in their faces. Scandals surrounding Democrats continue to impede any type of momentum liberals have towards an impeachment on Trump, just take a look at how CNN and MSNBC (the propaganda wing of their “resistance movement”) have been going down in flames in recent weeks.

Democrats are also licking their wounds after their high hopes for getting Trump impeached over the “Russian election conspiracy” was officially killed this weekend, after President Trump discussed the issue with Russian President Vladimir Putin during their closed-door meeting at the G-20 summit. Compound the issue that the Democratic Party has no real prospects to run against Trump in 2020, and it’s easy to see why Obama and liberals are panicking, as all their plans to get rid of Trump are currently going down in flames. After a devastating last month, Obama is now kicking his antics into full gear, where he will be heading a fundraiser in Washington D.C. this week in a desperate attempt to “woo donors” to invest in political races.” The Hill reported:

Former President Barack Obama will headline a fundraiser in Washington, D.C., this week.

He’s set to appear Thursday at a closed-door event for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, the Washington Post reported.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez told the Post that Obama wants to help “build the bench” for the Democrats.
NDRC Executive Director, Kelly Ward would not say how much Obama’s appearance is expected to bring in, said he “still has such a microphone” to woo donors to invest in state-level races.

“That bully pulpit still very much rests with him,” Ward told the Post.

Obama wants to support the committee’s “efforts to address unfair gerrymandering practices that leave too many American voters feeling voiceless in the electoral process,” spokesman Kevin Lewis said.

“Restoring fairness to our democracy by advocating for fairer, more inclusive district maps around the country is a priority for President Obama,” he added.

Former FBI Director James Comey may be in hot water after what has been recently discovered about his memos. Comey who is well aware of government procedures appeared to have “lack of judgment” which can lead to serious consequences. More than half of the memos that Comey took during his private conversations with President Trump hold classified information.

Now, any FBI agent knows that any information released during an ongoing investigation is strictly forbidden. In fact, all the records that are created by agents are considered government property and cannot be released to the public.

From the bureau’s policy:

Unauthorized disclosure, misuse, or negligent handling of information contained in the files, electronic or paper, of the FBI or which I may acquire as an employee of the FBI could impair national security, place human life in jeopardy, result in the denial of due process, prevent the FBI from effectively discharging its responsibilities, or violate federal law.

All information acquired by me in connection with my official duties with the FBI and all official material to which I have access remain the property of the United States of America. I will surrender upon demand by the FBI, or upon my separation from the FBI, all materials containing FBI information in my possession.

I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.

So, you would think that the Former FBI Director would know this rule, right? Well, apparently Comey forgot about it and possibly will have to answer for it now.

The Hill reports:

More than half of the memos former FBI chief James Comey wrote as personal recollections of his conversations with President Trump about the Russia investigation have been determined to contain classified information, according to interviews with officials familiar with the documents.

This revelation raises the possibility that Comey broke his own agency’s rules and ignored the same security protocol that he publicly criticized Hillary Clinton for in the waning days of the 2016 presidential election.

Comey insisted in his testimony he believed his personal memos were unclassified, though he hinted one or two documents he created might have been contained classified information.

But when the seven memos Comey wrote regarding his nine conversations with Trump about Russia earlier this year were shown to Congress in recent days, the FBI claimed all were, in fact, deemed to be government documents.

Four of the memos had markings making clear they contained information classified at the “secret” or “confidential” level, according to officials directly familiar with the matter.

A spokesman for the FBI on Sunday declined to comment.

Congressional investigators had already begun examining whether Comey’s creation, storage and sharing of the memos violated FBI rules, but the revelation that four of the seven memos included some sort of classified information opens a new door of inquiry into whether classified information was mishandled, improperly stored or improperly shared.

Maxine Waters is at it again, just like the mainstream media, spreading fake news and attempting to undermine a democratically elected President. With Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, and Bernie Sanders’ wife all under investigation, you’d think someone in the DNC would get this nutcase to be quiet. Every time Maxine Waters speaks, the only thing she accomplishes is displaying how obtuse and dumb she is.

Let me paint the picture for you, MSNBC has this thing called ‘Moment of Maxine’, yes she has her own TV segment, where brain dead liberals and God knows who else tune in to listen to this garbage. Maxine was carrying on with the fake news story that 17 intelligence agencies concluded unanimously, that Russia interfered with the 2016 Presidential election. Of course, the host of the show, Jonathan Capehart held an unbiased position in his questioning. Here is a partial transcript of the segment:

Jonathan Capehart: After the first face-to-face meeting between Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the White House is basically saying, let’s get past this whole Russia interfered in our Democratic process thing. But my next guest is saying not so fast. Joining me now for our Moment Of Maxine, Auntie Maxine to the rest of you, Congresswoman Maxine Waters. Thank you for getting up oh so early there in Los Angeles to be with us today.

Maxine Waters: You’re welcome. Delighted to be with you.

It was at this point, I threw up in my mouth watching this filth, but for the sake of journalistic integrity, I knew for my readers I had to muscle through it.

Jonathan Capehart: So I want to start the conversation with a Tweet you sent out, and our producer Tracy Curry came up with the best sort of translation of it …
Jonathan Capehart goes on to describe this translation of Maxine’s Tweet, which is full of insults and name-calling. You know, what liberals do best because they lack the common sense to form a legitimate retort when faced with facts. Maxine refers to President Trump as weak and impotent and, is mad because President Trump is not being nice to Obama. It is obvious that the filth and fake news is continuing.

Jonathan Capehart: What was so troubling to you about the President at the G20?

Maxine Waters: Well, I’ll tell you what’s troubling is to me about this President. First of all, he has consistently denied that Russia is responsible for the hacking. He says well it could have been somebody else. He left the United States of America with that position. He went to this meeting with no note takers, uh no staff people, just he and Tillerson. Both of whom want to lift sanctions, and they basically brought up the subject, did not delve very deeply into why Putin and people in the Kremlin and others may have been involved in this hacking. And you know they didn’t talk about our intelligence agencies, 17 of them, who have concluded, that yes, they were involved in the hacking, the undermining of our elections, the undermining of our democracy. That’s what it amounts to. And so Putin you know politely brought it up because he left here with so much pressure. He knew he couldn’t go in there and not say anything. But really he didn’t delve deeply into it and now you have Tillerson and the President believing Putin over all of our intelligence agencies when they’re saying “yes they did”, and Putin is saying, “no he didn’t” in our face………

There are a few things to point our here about Maxine’s statement. First, she carries on with the whole fake ’17 intelligence agencies story’ that they all said Russia conducted hacking operations to undermine the 2016 Presidential Election, but in actuality, the number was 4. Here is a video, which even demonstrates the New York Times had to concede President Trump was accurate in that it was 4 agencies and not 17. Meaning 13 other agencies have serious doubts about whether Russia was involved. This is hardly a conclusive finding.
Second, Maxine said that President Trump did not aggressively press Putin on the issue, which is not true. President Trump stated he brought the issue up twice, aggressively, and Putin denied it. Knowing how President Trump does business I believe him. The fact that there were no staff or note takers present is probably because President Trump and Putin were talking about highly sensitive matters, not for public consumption.

Many Facebook users around the world are now familiar with the name Jayden K. Smith after a message went out yesterday warning everyone online not to accept a friend request from this mystery person. Perhaps for some, it was already too late, as they now have a new addition to their “friend” list, having not gotten the warning about this account before selecting “accept” to this stranger’s seemingly friendly offer. Now, we know what the real threat of this viral message going around is and what it’s done to millions of people on Facebook.

The message spread like wildfire, filling people’s Facebook feeds or messages from known friends in your Facebook Messenger inbox. It was alarming but seemed to serve as a heads up that if you get a friend request from a “Jayden K. Smith,” to not accept this black-listed Facebook user who is allegedly a hacker. The alert simply stated that this maniacal individual masquerading as a normal person on social media would have access to all of your personal and private information once you take the request bait and allow him onto your profile. However, was this a hack or a hoax? Here’s what you really need to know now 24 hours after it swept the Internet.

The message that you may have gotten along with many others of Facebook looked like this: “Please tell all the contacts in your messenger list not to accept Jayden K. Smith friendship request. He is a hacker and has the system connected to your Facebook account. If one of your contacts accepts it, you will also be hacked, so make sure that all your friends know it. Thanks. ”

While well-meaning users shared this just to be safe and not sorry, what they were really spreading was something much different than they thought. Fox 2 Now reports:

“Mass friend requests are flagged by Facebook as spam. So it is unlikely that anyone using a single account would use this as a method to hack millions of people. It is also against the social network’s terms and conditions so the offending account would be easily dealt with.”

It would be impossible for a single Facebook user to request millions of people’s friendship at once, or within a short time period, without being flagged and prevented from doing so. Additionally, a friend of yours on Facebook is not able to break into your account simply by you accepting their request. For these reasons, “Jayden K. Smith” is not a hacker, it’s a hoax message that managed to dupe droves of Facebook users into falling for it, but that doesn’t mean a Facebook danger is non-existent.

“The Independent reports that you shouldn’t just accept all friend requests. A hacker can’t access your password by simply becoming your friend but they can get a lot of information about you. Be careful who you accept as a friend because they can potentially see your personal information like address, date of birth or phone number,” according to Fox 2 Now.
“You should ignore the request to share this warning. Messages like this get recycled from time to time. They often contain elements like sensational warnings with devastating consequences and a prompt to share the message with everyone. Past warnings include names like Bobby Roberts, Anwar Jitou, and Tanner Dwyer.”
TimesUnion reports:

“There is no Jayden K. Smith. I mean, maybe there is, but he (I’m going with Jayden being male) is no different than the dozens of other ridiculous friend requests you get from people you don’t know — people typically based in the middle east and/or supposedly divorced or widowed and currently in the U.S. military.”

“You accept them, they try to get you to buy some island from their dying father, you mess with them a bit and then their account gets shut down by Facebook. It’s really as basic (and harmless) as that.”

“The only way to protect your account — or at least attempt to — from hackers is to have a strong password, not leave your account logged on when you leave a shared computer and to be vigilant. Oh, and use some common sense.”