CNN purposefully skewed infant-mortality rate statistics that cost a hospital CEO his job — and the judge did not mince words when it comes to the “fake news” being peddled from the network.

This win comes as Judge Orinda Evans outright rejected CNN’s bid to get the case dismissed, which continues the legal process.

Law News reports:

Davide Carbone, former CEO of St. Mary’s Medical Center in West Palm Beach, filed a defamation lawsuit against CNN after they aired what he claims were a “series of false and defamatory news reports” regarding the infant mortality rate at the hospital. CNN’s report said the mortality rate was three times the national average. However, Mr. Carbone contends that CNN “intentionally” manipulated statistics to bolster their report. He also claims that CNN purposely ignored information that would look favorable to the hospital in order to sensationalize the story.

“In our case, we contended that CNN essentially made up its own standard in order to conduct an ‘apples to oranges’ comparison to support its false assertion that St. Mary’s mortality rate was 3 times higher than the national average. Accordingly, the case against CNN certainly fits the description of media-created ‘Fake News.’” said Carbone’s attorney L. Lin Wood, in a statement to LawNewz.com.
Wood says that as a result of CNN’s story Carbone lost his job and it became extremely difficult for him to find new employment in the field of hospital administration.

“False and defamatory accusations against real people have serious consequences. Neither St. Mary’s or Mr. Carbone did anything to deserve being the objects of the heinous accusation that they harmed or put babies and young children at risk for profit,” Wood said.

On Monday, Federal District Judge Orinda Evans ruled that the case could move forward, even ruling that she found that CNN may have acted with “actual malice” with the report — a standard necessary to prove a defamation claim.

“The Court finds these allegations sufficient to establish that CNN was acting recklessly with regard to the accuracy of its report, i.e., with ‘actual malice,” the order reads. CNN had tried to get the case dismissed.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone, but Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is having trouble understanding the Constitution, and in this particular case its prohibition against a religious test for public office.

During a confirmation hearing Wednesday for a Office of Management and Budget nominee, Sanders was clearly trying to impose a religious test on a Trump administration nominee.

About halfway through the Senate Budget Committee hearing of nominee Russell Vought, Sanders asked him directly about his Christian faith. His question related to a line taken from a blog post Vought wrote in January of 2016.
“You wrote, ‘Muslims do not simply have a deficient theology. They do not know God because they have rejected Jesus Christ, His Son, and they stand condemned.’ Do you believe that that statement is Islamophobic?” Sanders asked.

“Absolutely not, senator. I’m a Christian, and I believe in a Christian set of principles based on my faith,” Vought replied. “That post, as I stated in the questionnaire to this committee, was to defend my alma mater, Wheaton College, a Christian school that has a statement of faith that includes the centrality of Jesus Christ for salvation, and …”

“I apologize. Forgive me, we just don’t have a lot of time,” Sanders interrupted. “Do you believe people in the Muslim religion stand condemned? Is that your view?”
As Vought attempted to once again explain that he was a Christian, Sanders cut him off, shouting, “I understand you are a Christian, but this country are made of people who are not just — I understand that Christianity is the majority religion, but there are other people of different religions in this country and around the world. In your judgment, do you think that people who are not Christians are going to be condemned?”

“As a Christian, I believe that all individuals are made in the image of God and are worthy of dignity and respect regardless of their religious beliefs. I believe that as a Christian that’s how I should treat all individuals,” Vought responded.
After Vought once again refused to renounce what he wrote in the blog, Sanders said, “I would simply say, Mr. Chairman, that this nominee is really not someone who this country is supposed to be about,” adding that he would be voting against confirming the nomination.

Essentially, Sanders is insisting that anyone who believes there is only one way to salvation (which includes Muslims, by the way) are not fit to serve in public office. While trying to expose Vought as unsuitable for office, Sanders instead revealed it’s him who has an utter disrespect for our nation’s Constitution.

The fact that Vought holds orthodox Christian beliefs and has written about them publicly has no bearing on whether he is an acceptable nominee to work in the Office of Management and Budget, or any other public office for that matter.

Sanders choice to focus on Vought’s public statements regarding the Christian faith shows his staunch opposition to Christians, and should be concerning to anyone who believes in our Constitution and our nation’s heritage of religious liberty.

And to think this man could have been president.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Joy Behar and her fellow liberals are constantly talking about how “racist” Donald Trump is despite the fact that they are never able to cite any clear evidence of this. However, when proud liberal Bill Maher used the “N-word” last week, Behar made excuses for him as she adamantly continued to claim that Trump’s “racism” is worse.

During The View’s Monday episode, the women discussed the backlash Maher faced after referring to himself as a “house n****r.” The Blaze reported that Behar defended Maher, calling him “one of the good guys” in the “fight” against Trump. Co-host Whoopi Goldberg agreed with Behar, saying that she has “very specific feelings about the word,” and noted that Maher didn’t refer to anyone else but himself when he used the racial epithet.

After co-host Sunny Hostin tried to chastise Maher a little bit, Behar jumped back in to change the subject.

“Bill Maher is one of the good guys in this fight against Trump right now,” Behar began. “Not to deflect from what he said, ’cause he already apologized, but Donald Trump and his people that ran his real estate agent [sic], they actually practiced racism.”
They discriminated against black people in housing,” she continued, not offering any evidence to support this. “To me, that is a much more egregious sin than saying any kind of word. … Let’s not lose perspective about comedians and words and things that comedians are saying, ’cause there seems to be this assault on comedians.”

Had Maher been a conservative Trump supporter, Behar and her liberal friends on The View would have demanded his head on a platter and would not have rested until his career was destroyed. However, since he was a liberal, he is being given a free pass to use the “N-word” as a white person.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Nothing sends a Liberal snowflake into a good temper tantrum quite like when Trump does anything that remotely supports any kind of “liberal belief.” Yet he is thinking of doing just that, and in a big way that will be amazingly good for ALL of us! If Trump goes through with his border wall the snowflakes will erupt. BUT, if he goes through with his border wall made out of solar panels…what will they do?

This is an EPIC move by Trump and liberals are melting everywhere!

Here is more from Allen West:

We’re at the point where President Donald Trump could say that the sky is blue, and the headline on the New York Times tomorrow would be “Debate Rages Over Color of Sky.” PolitiFact would probably rate the president’s claim “half-true,” noting that while the sky is indeed blue on some days, it is cloudy on others. We bring that up only because it was just last week that Trump was getting ravaged for supposedly saying “screw you” to the planet in pulling out of the Paris Agreement, an agreement that wasn’t binding legally, and would cost the U.S. $100 billion a year to reduce temperatures by a negligible 0.2 degrees Celsius by 2100. Even former NASA scientist James Hansen, the “father of climate change,” concurred that the Paris Agreement was a bum deal. That aside, it’ll be interesting to see the excuses those same environmentalists have for opposing a new environmental twist on Trump’s “big beautiful wall.”

As Fox News reported, President Trump on Tuesday reportedly suggested that solar panels could offset some of the costs to erect a border wall on the U.S.’s southern border. Trump made the pitch on Tuesday during a meeting with congressional Republicans, two lawmakers who attended the meeting told The Wall Street Journal. The details of the plan were still unclear, but the revenue from selling the solar power generated by the panels could help offset some of the construction costs.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Never once did Obama nor any of his administration ever warn State Election Officials of any Russian effort to hack or influence the Electoral System, according to the president of the National Association of Secretaries of State. In the midst of the Comey testimony to the committee currently investigating the supposition that there was Russian interference of our 2016 elections, we are now hearing from many that the previous administration failed to ever warn anyone within the necessary pathways that it was possible that Russia was hacking the system.

Comey is currently trying to clean his own slate for his failures as an Intelligence Agency leader by lying and throwing Trump under the bus in the Committee investigation while the Democrats try their best to turn the attention from the actual issues and lie on national television repeatedly. Now, it is coming out that there was never ANY evidence to even assume that Russia was trying to interfere!

Via The Daily Caller exclusive:

“We did ask,” Denise Merrill, Connecticut Secretary of state and the association’s top official, told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group Wednesday. “And over-and-over again, they did say there was no credible threat that they had found. And they said that right through the election, and the next administration reiterated that. Over and over again when we asked, we were told there was no actual threat that they knew of,” Merrill said.

Asked if there were any private briefings for state election officials on possible Russian interference prior to the November 2016 voting, Merrill said, “No. We were not briefed on any of that. We were not told in advance.” Merrill also claimed the administration failed to take state officials aside about a potential or real Russian threat to election machinery. “That’s right because I don’t really think there was one,” she said.
Not only is there no actual evidence of the Russians ‘hacking’ the 2016 Presidential election, former DNI James Clapper said AGAIN in an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd recently that he saw no “smoking gun” evidence of collusion between the Trump camp and Russian state actors. The Trump-Russia hoax is an embarrassment to the U.S. The Democrats just won’t accept that Hillary Clinton was a big fat failure so they created a scandal out of thin air. The Russia hoax is also being used to distract from the unmasking of Trump and his private associates by the Obama administration.

Is it any shock for the average American to hear that the previous administration itself didn’t even find any possibility of hacking the elections from day one all the way through the campaign and even now? Not at all actually. It has been reiterated numerous times that there is no evidence and never has been yet the Democrats are still spouting it as fact literally to this day. Sore losers make for dirty bed-fellows!

Feel free to show us all that ‘evidence’ that supposedly exists any time you feel froggy!