The whole “Russian hacking the election” deal appears to be falling apart.
I’ve also seen one video that purports several MSM type media, including Washington Post, have retracted their original “Russia hacked election” articles… as yet I’ve been unable to find the WaPo retraction article (I believe this one is the original; here’s another).
Title and highlights from each are below.
Washington Post goes “full treason” – fabricates entire story falsely claiming Trump won because of Russian hacks (12-10-16 Mike Adams, Natural News)
“The Washington Post has finally committed its most desperate act of credibility suicide, publishing a blatantly false, fabricated story that now claims Russia directly interfered with the election to deliver a victory to Donald Trump. Click here to read the WashPost fabrication in full.
“The WashPost story does not name a single source for the accusation, and the obviously fabricated story serves primarily to provide cover for a previous story the Washington Post also faked (and then got caught faking).
“WashPost story completely bogus… and they know it… “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,” said the Trump transition team.
“RNC spokesman Sean Spicer also lashed out at the false WashPost “fake news” report. Via DailyCaller.com: “The intelligence is wrong,” Spicer told Smerconish. “It didn’t happen. We offered the New York Times conclusive proof that it didn’t happen. They ignored it. They refused to look at it because it didn’t fit the narrative.”
“The Washington Post has demonstrated it is a clear and present national security threat to the United States of America. They’ve gone beyond their usual news fakery and have now decided to actively work against the interests of democracy.”
Russian hack narrative revealed to be elaborate media hoax… email leaks actually came from Bernie Sanders insider (12-15-16 Mike Adams, Natural News)
“And now the total hoax… begins to unravel. After days of witnessing the left-wing media hyperventilate over completely fabricated claims that “the Russians” hacked the DNC emails and turned them over to Wikileaks, it turns out the emails were actually leaked by a DNC insider who was angry about the orchestrated elimination of Bernie Sanders by Clinton operatives.
“The UK Daily Mail is now reporting that Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, personally met the email leaker who handed him the emails files later released by Wikileaks….
“Wikileaks’ Julian Assange also previously confirmed that the leaked DNC emails did not come from the Russians. The Washington Post, New York Times and other discredited propaganda mouthpieces of the regime continue to insinuate that the Russians somehow altered the election outcome to favor Donald Trump, but they haven’t produced a single shred of real evidence to back up their claims.
“The goal is to create doubt in the minds of the electoral voters.Despite the complete lack of evidence, the entire left-wing media (propaganda pushers) in the United States has further abandoned any last semblance of journalistic integrity…
“That delusional conspiracy theory is being pushed by a coordinated media campaign with the aim of spreading sufficient disinfo to cause electoral voters to change their votes on December 19th.”