I hope you’re prepared to be angered by the most radicalized liberal bullsh*t you have ever read. This horrible story involves the worst case of liberalism you may have ever witnessed.

Long story short? A five-year-old girl was gang raped and peed on by three Muslims and they didn’t go to jail.

Short story long? Let’s get right into those horrible details that will hopefully have you rally behind the true victim, a 5-year-old girl, and call for the jail time of a horrible judge and terrible lawyer.

Her name is Jayla Peterson and she was raped orally and anally by three Muslim migrants. After raping her in horrible ways, the rapists then urinated on her body. Another Islamic influenced horrendous crime by the sick and sad uncivilized Muslim religion. Do we see a pattern yet with the Muslim migrants? They’re 99.9% worthless people who don’t know how to act when they migrate to another country. They’re generally horrible people who think this is the land of barbaric treatment towards others. I don’t care what culture or religion you’re from, the rape of a five-year-old can’t be justified by anyone. Well, except Muslims. They clearly think this is acceptable behavior. Maybe it’s in their sh*tty Sharia law. What page of their lawbook says it is acceptable to rape and urinate on kids?

five-year-old Jayla Peterson… was orally and anally raped and then urinated upon by three Muslim migrant boys, two from Iraq one from Sudan, in the town of Twin Falls, Idaho as one of the boys videoed the attack.

As if the rape and urination weren’t bad enough, these losers made a video of the attack. I wonder how many “likes” they got from their culture for this.

The rape and urination on a five-year-old story gets worse. That was the disgusting start of a story with a hideous outcome that is NOT the gold standard of American justice, but instead, the liberals obsession with Islam, proving why no liberal should ever hold a position in court or law.
Of all the quotes and sayings from America’s founding, there’s one known to almost all of our citizens, it ends with “and justice for all.” Images of a blindfolded lady liberty holding the scales of justice (supposedly) symbolize the fact that the American judicial system does not see age, color or creed. The judge in this tragic case seems to have tossed all that, with a shocking decision on the guilt of the attackers and then a gag order for everyone involved. There’s a politically correct cover-up going on, and it’s despicable.

Tossed all of that puts it lightly. It’s more like the liberals put American values and the safety of a five-year-old on one of those medieval cannon ball launchers and shot it into the horizon with hopes to not ever see it again. This liberal piece of trash said “bye Felicia” to protecting American citizens and getting first on the list to show love for a lousy religion and their criminals.

Pamela Gellar from Jihad Watch wrote the following account of the courtroom drama:

“Judge Thomas Borreson of Idaho’s 5th Judicial District ordered the little victim’s parents, Lacy and Levi Peterson, to say nothing to anyone – ever – about what was said in the courtroom Tuesday, or to disclose the sentence that he gave to the savage attackers. He did allow them to say that they were unhappy with the sentencing, but threatened to jail them for contempt of court if they disclosed why they were unhappy with it.

Judge Thomas Borrenson deserves to lose his job and spend life in prison with Muslim rapists. How dare he threaten a family whose child was already tortured? How dare he tell a family how to react or what to say/not say about the case where their precious and innocent child was treated like a sexualized goat in Afghanistan? Is this someone who deserves to be a judge? Absolutely not. Judge Thomas Borrenson is unfit to serve the American public and unfit to make intelligent decisions that put criminals where they belong. These three rapists deserve at least 20 years in the slammer. AT LEAST! Judge Thomas Borrenson deserves to spend 20 years with them.

Twelve employees in Indiana, working for the Democrat-backed group Patriot Majority USA, have been charged with submitting fraudulent voter registration applications in the lead-up to the 2016 election. (via The Daily Caller)

Patriot Majority USA is dedicated to mobilizing and registering black voters, and has strong ties to former President Bill Clinton, and the former Democrat Senate Minority Leader, Harry Reid.

However, despite the Democrat connections, Patriot Majority USA is a registered nonprofit that is not permitted to promote any particular candidate, or partisan cause.

Eleven temporary canvassers and their supervisor, Holiday Burke, have been charged with submitting fraudulent voter registrations. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of two and a half years in prison.

Authorities became aware of the fraudulent activity after a clerk discovered over a dozen registration forms with inaccurate, and suspicious, information.

The canvassers were registering voters who did not exist, residents who had already registered to vote, and even some minors. All sorts of people were illegally registered.
Patriot Majority USA describes themselves as a grassroots organization, however, the vast majority of the group’s funding is provided by a few anonymous donors.

In 2013, twelve anonymous donors contributed over $1 million each. An additional donor single-handedly gave $6 million to the supposedly community-driven project. The organization also has close ties to labor unions, which contributed over $3 million in 2013. The spending was likely higher during the 2016 election.

Despite the Democrat party’s efforts to fraudulently enlarge their voter pool, Hillary Clinton was still easily defeated by President Trump. President Trump beat Clinton by almost 20 points, receiving over 500,000 more critical votes than his opponent.

Hillary Clinton was so unlikable, and her policy solutions were so obviously disastrous, that the Democrat candidate could not even muster up a win while cheating.

The classic Democrat talking point, that voter fraud does not exist, is starting to look suspicious as they continue to get caught rigging elections.

President Trump’s lawyer, Jay Sekulow responded on Live TV about allegations made under oath by former FBI director Comey.

I have no idea what the context of that call was or was going to be. And I can’t speculate on that. But I would say at the outset, George, and you raised this, the issue of the leak from James Comey to his friend at Columbia Law School, that was ultimately leaked to The New York Times, is unprecedented.

I mean, I want everyone to be thinking about this. The current — then current FBI director took contemporaneous notes, put them on a form, used government facilities to do that. If an FBI agent does that, they usually fill out a form 302.

Could you imagine what would happen if an FBI agent then leaked that form 302 out to The New York Times, what the allegations would be? So this was an unprecedented move. And Preet mentioned the issue of executive privilege. The president and the administration wasn’t — they did not invoke executive privilege on this hearing, but on these documents they didn’t know what the contents were.
The president said he is going to address the issue of the tapes, whether the tapes exist or not, next week. That’s a decision that the president will make in consultation with his chief lawyer Marc Kasowitz, and that the president said he’ll address it next week.

But here’s the one thing that’s clear, right now what do you have? A leaked memo that was leaked to The Washington Post, allegedly because he read in The New York Times or he read the tweet, but yet, you know, what’s also interesting is, much of the content of what appeared to be in that memorandum was actually in The New York Times the day before.

According to Dennis Michael Lynch, sleuth extraordinaire, Chelsea took to Twitter to express her outrage over REPUBLICANS forcing schoolchildren to go hungry. Clinton stated that “research” confirms kids do better when they aren’t hungry, but soon realized her mistake — Michelle Obama’s program JUST got scrapped because kids were going hungry!

Oh, sweet irony. When Michelle Obama got involved in our nation’s school lunch system, she decided that EVERYTHING on the menu should be “healthy” and top-notch. The only problem with her master plan was this: children were refusing to eat the array of disgusting foods put on their plates. Please, enlighten us — what 8-year-old likes eating bean sprouts?
The original tweet Chelsea posted implied that “research showed” that children who aren’t hungry pay more attention in class than hungry ones. We don’t think the research was necessary for this study. Obviously, if you’re hungry, then learning and retaining information is going to be a challenge. We sure are glad that Chelsea was on the case.

Twitter users started calling her out almost immediately. Somehow, she thought it would be a good idea to blame Republicans in a secondary tweet! It’s hilarious, yet sad, that she’s this dense.

If everyone recalls, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue announced a full rollback on Michelle’s plan. Perdue gave a specific reason why this had to happen immediately.

“This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students, schools, and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals.” Perdue continued, “If kids aren’t eating the food, and it is ending up in the trash, they aren’t getting any nutrition — thus undermining the intent of the program.”

Just think, Chelsea, a couple of minutes of research would have saved you from this embarrassment. You inadvertently called out Michelle Obama while blaming Republicans. The beautiful thing about the internet? It NEVER forgets.

Some of the responses Clinton got to her tweets were amazing. There was a systematic breakdown of why she was wrong, and there were facts to support the claim — something that confuses the Left. You cannot just go online and make a bold claim like that with no facts to support what you’re saying! Plain and simple — well, unless you’re willing to look like a fool.

Chelsea seemed to want to respond to the people supporting her, but had nothing to say to the people with those pesky facts. Maybe liberals will never learn to think about what they’re saying. If not, at least we have plenty of great laughs coming up from these fools. They honestly believe they’re doing a great service for the world.

Several weeks ago, 11 year-old Barron Trump was traumatized when he saw Kathy Griffin in a photoshoot, holding a severed, bloody head in the likeness of the president. Barron was reportedly upset thinking the images were real.

The experience was very difficult for the young child, which is why it was truly despicable when the women of The View mocked Barron for it on an episode of their ABC talk show.

Former The View host Star Jones got the ball rolling when she guest-hosted the program last week.

“Our president though cracks me up when he says his son was upset,” Jones said, according to Breitbart. “He has to remember — I wonder how upset he was when he heard his father referred to the kinds of assaults that he would do on women or did they not talk about that?”

“Or making fun of handicapped people,” interjected Joy Behar.

“Yes exactly,” said Jones.

“Or make fun of a Gold Star family. I mean he was horrible,” Behar said of Trump.

“There is a lot to have been embarrassed about if that was your father,” Jones concluded.
Hosts Of ‘The View’ Launch VILE Attack On Barron Trump – They Aren’t Laughing Now…
WRITTEN BY ADAM LOTT (1 DAY AGO)
Share This StorySHARE THIS STORY
Several weeks ago, 11 year-old Barron Trump was traumatized when he saw Kathy Griffin in a photoshoot, holding a severed, bloody head in the likeness of the president. Barron was reportedly upset thinking the images were real. The experience was very difficult for the young child, which is why it was truly despicable when the women of The View mocked Barron for it on an episode of their ABC talk show.
Former The View host Star Jones got the ball rolling when she guest-hosted the program last week.
“Our president though cracks me up when he says his son was upset,” Jones said, according to Breitbart. “He has to remember — I wonder how upset he was when he heard his father referred to the kinds of assaults that he would do on women or did they not talk about that?”
“Or making fun of handicapped people,” interjected Joy Behar.
“Yes exactly,” said Jones.
“Or make fun of a Gold Star family. I mean he was horrible,” Behar said of Trump.
“There is a lot to have been embarrassed about if that was your father,” Jones concluded.

Since their despicable comments, thousands of patriots are calling for The View to be permanently cancelled. There’s already a petition on Change.org called Cancel ABC’s The View that has thousands of signatures. Plus people are also taking to social media to express their outrage and disgust.

Will the ladies on The View apologize for their remarks? Will the show eventually be cancelled due to their inappropriate statements and incessant anti-Trump propaganda? Only time will tell, but in the meantime, thousands of patriots are letting these horrible, spiteful zealots know exactly how they feel.

We have to wonder why liberals think Obama did such a good job as president.

The national debt and the shocking number of people on government programs proves he did a poor job. A good president helps restore the economy, so that Americans have job opportunities. Instead Obama made it easy for more and more people to take instead of give.

A thriving nation is one full of people who work. They earn a living to support their families. They take ownership of their own lives.

A nation full of people getting food stamps is weak. Those people need the government to take care of them. That’s a bad situation to be in.

But now that President Trump is in office, things are changing. We see jobs coming back into the country. The stock market is booming. Companies have promised to invest in American labor.

On top of that, Trump is getting the federal budget under control. He is reforming government handout programs.

The first one to get serous changes will be food stamps. And a few freeloaders are getting the boot.

From Yes I’m Right:

Overseeing the food benefit program (SNAP) is The U.S. Department of Agriculture, who reportedly has almost 43.6 million people getting food stamps as of April 2016.
On that massive meal ticket are a particularly grotesque bunch of criminals who have been convicted of sickening sex crimes and murder. These violent perverts are among those getting the boot…

Felons aren’t the only ones on the potential chopping block. Those who were lucky enough to win a large lottery sum or gambling winnings aren’t so lucky that they get to keep their welfare and windfall of funds.

If they happen to spend through that cash and wind up in need again, they can get on welfare, but the proposal would prevent them from being on it while benefitting from their cash prize.

Imagine that. Under Obama, murderers and sex offenders were getting free food, courtesy of you and men. Even worse, people who won millions on the lotto or gambling were getting their food bill comped–by the U.S. tax payer.

Why was Obama so intent of protecting these two groups? Food stamps and Welfare are meant to help those struggling to find work, not criminals and lotto winners.

It seems like liberals just love spending our money, regardless on who. They love to punish hard-working tax payers to reward child molesters and gamblers. Insane.

But that’s all coming to an end. President Trump is ending such abuses and getting federal programs back on track.

The House has passed 158 bills to date, making this House and this President the most PRODUCTIVE in modern-era.

That’s right, President Trump is who not even receiving a salary for his work, has worked harder than his 4 predecessors.

This is why we elected President Trump – to GET STUFF DONE!

Thank you, President Trump!

From Washington Times

House Speaker Paul Ryan and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy have issued a very promising report about President Trump so far in his presidency. Compared to his immediate predecessors, Mr. Trump is forging ahead in his bid to better the nation and move forward.

“To date, President Trump has signed 37 bills into law, placing him ahead of the last four administrations,” the two Republican leaders noted in a report issued Thursday.
At this point in his presidency, President Obama had signed off on 24 bills. President George W. Bush signed 15, President Clinton 33 bills and President George H.W. Bush 35.

The two leaders had other news of interest to voters weary of a do-nothing Capitol Hill.

“The Republican-led House has passed 158 bills, making it the most productive in the modern-era,” the pair said in their report, noting that during the equivalent passage of time in the Obama administration, the House passed 131 bills.

Democrat Senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, recently let loose in a foul-mouthed rant — targeting President Trump at the Personal Democracy Forum at New York University. The rant was captured on video, revealing the unsavory, R-rated language for the world to see.

That sort of language would not be acceptable on a construction site, much less coming from the mouth of an elected U.S. senator.

Comments such as these are best reserved for the cab of a pickup truck, or a bar or locker room, and should never be uttered publicly by a politician — especially when referring to the president of the United States.

The Democrat senator was clearly attempting to pander to younger audiences by “being hip,” and cursing like a sailor — but her effort to appear cool backfired in every way possible.

Older, more conservative Americans were shocked by the unprofessional language, and young people could smell the pandering a mile away, leaving Gillibrand looking foolish.

Even the moderator was shocked by Gillibrand’s foul mouth. He was forced to remind Gillibrand to keep it clean by dropping a hint — his 90-year-old mother was watching from the front row.
Senator Gillibrand’s choice of words inadvertently revealed a major problem for the Democrats. The party has made no effort to recover following their historic 2016 electoral loss. Now, Democrat members of congress are floundering in their attempts to appeal to the American voters.

The Democrats know they cannot win a policy debate. President Trump’s legislative agenda is perfectly aligned with tax-paying Americans. The only option for Democrats is to promise more free stuff, and to slander the duly-elected president at every turn.

Their vapid strategy is already starting to wear thin, and voters are realizing that the Democrats have nothing positive to offer.

In an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America’s News HQ” on Sunday, Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-TX) said that if anyone interfered with the 2016 presidential election, it wasn’t the Russians but the Department of Justice.

He specifically named former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former FBI Director James Comey.

Gohmert referred to Comey’s testimony last week before the Senate Intelligence Committee where he said Lynch had told him to refer to the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information as a “matter,” rather than an “investigation,” even though Clinton was under investigation.

Comey said that led him to publicly announce the end of the Clinton investigation in July 2016.

“At best, it was an attempt to manipulate the election, not by the Russians in this case, but by the Department of Justice – the Attorney General herself – because that came from Comey,” Gohmert said.
“[Comey] totally ruined his own credibility – or what was left of it,” Gohmert said. “He did vast damage and raised big red flags and questions over Loretta Lynch’s job as head of the Justice Department.

“[Lynch] was using her official position to help the campaign of Hillary Clinton and that didn’t seem to bother him enough to do a memo,” Gohmert said.

Gohmert said this should be the subject of a congressional investigation.

And here we go again. Michelle Obama is once again complaining about something.

Former First Lady Michelle “not proud of my country” Obama revealed during a candid interview at the Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference in San Jose, California on Tuesday that her husband, Former President Barack Hussein Obama, wore the same tuxedo and shoes for all eight years of his presidency during state dinners. I really hope they at least had it dry cleaned in between events.

Wasn’t Apple supposed to be a tech company?
She went on to add that since society is so sexist you can’t even begin to imagine the whispering and Monday morning commentary if she, as the first lady, had done that?
Gee Moochelle, who would have thought that looking so ugly and classless took so much effort on your behalf?

But no need to fear, we now have a first lady who doesn’t care about fixing herself up and looking good. Maybe because to our new first lady Melania Trump it just all comes naturally.
Melania Trump hasn’t been poisoned by the modern feminist movement who thinks women should all just wear potato sacks, an ugly pantsuit, or just a plain tux like men wear. In your case Moochelle, I really don’t think anyone would have minded, in fact, it would have probably been chalked up to honesty and truth in advertising.

Notice though how Michelle Obama always seems to mention how bad it was to live a lavish lifestyle on the already heavily overburdened American Taxpayer dime. But not once has she ever mentioned the perks she had for just dressing up and splashing a little bit of makeup on her mug.

A full list and cost of the Obama family vacations during the 8 long years Hussein was in office:

First Family Vacations

Below is a list of First Family vacations. Judicial Watch has been at the forefront of exposing the trips and the waste of taxpayer dollars through Freedom of Information Act requests and lawsuits, to obtain the details, when necessary.

Judicial Watch: Secret Service Expenses for Obama’s 2013 Hawaii Christmas Vacation Cost Taxpayers $316,698.03, Taxpayers Paid Over $8 Million for 17-Day Vacation

The known total expense to the American taxpayers thus far for all Obama travel is now $70,880,035.78!

Judicial Watch Seeks Federal Court Injunction against Secret Service for Records of Obama and VIP Security Costs for Travel

The US Secret Service Has Ignored 19 Judicial Watch FOIA Requests…

Judicial Watch: President Obama’s 2015 Golf and Family Vacation Trips Cost Taxpayers $3,115,688.70 in Travel Expenses Alone

Fifth Palm Springs visit in two years included golf at plush, private 249-acre Porcupine Creek Estate owned by Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison

Former FBI Director James Comey deleted a memo that could have been important during his first testimony since being fired by President Trump. The memo is reportedly something he potentially leaked to the NY Times. Comey reported that he deleted it. This is also known as the “I’m not giving you anything that may or may not harm me” strategy where people usually refuse to deliver something that may harm them in any way. Is it an admission of guilt, or did Comey simply delete the leaked memo because it had nothing of importance? But that drives us to ask that if it wasn’t important, then why leak it? If it wasn’t him, or it didn’t contain damning information, then why not produce a copy of it.

How did Comey send it? Email? Snail mail? Hand delivery? Carrier pigeon? If email, then there’s a copy in his sent email folder. Or maybe there’s an old draft. If not, then there’s probably a way to roll back his computer to a previous date and see a copy of it there. The thing with computers is that things deleted are usually recoverable. Even the Geek Squad idiots at Best Buy can sometimes figure that out for a ridiculously overpriced fee.

After former FBI Director James Comey testified on Thursday, the Senate Intelligence Committee naturally asked Comey for a copy of the infamous memo in question that he had leaked through a friend to the NY Times.

During testimony, Comey testified he felt he needed to take notes to protect himself in his conversations with President Donald Trump and then being so concerned about going on record with facts after a Trump tweet that he supposedly had his friend, Daniel Richman, leak the contents to the NY Times.

Problem? When the committee asked for the memo, Comey said he no longer had copies.

So where is it, bro? You mean to tell me in 2017 with the crazy amount of advanced technology that there’s no way to recover a copy of a memo? Is this the only guy who hand-writes memos and faxes them like it’s the late 80’s? I didn’t know James Comey served as a six-foot grade school secretary in his spare time. Maybe he has another career after all! I’m guessing either Comey is playing hardball and doesn’t care to provide a memo, because he thinks it’s pointless, or the slight chance that he doesn’t want them to see it.

The committee was then required to request copies from the Richman. Here’s the relevant excerpt of the letter to Richman noting this.
So this was so important for Comey to take the notes to protect himself, but then he deleted the memo from his FBI laptop?

As we have previously reported, the NY Times reporter who broke the story never even saw the memo. Indeed the information he got from Richman was recounted to him over the phone from what Richman supposedly remembered. Richman didn’t have the memo when he spoke to the reporter. So would he even be able to turn it over to the committee now if he didn’t have it then?

What in the sweet Jesus is going on here? Comey has a memo but deletes it, but there’s a leak, but he protects himself, but….what next? This sounds more and more like a TV drama about government. I swear it’s like we’ve watched this on television before.

If people really want to get a memo from a computer, then it probably only takes a few moments. However, it’s an FBI computer. Maybe they have a self-destruct option like Inspector Gadget’s notes that Chief Quimby reads from the safety of a trash can. Sounds more and more like Chief Quimby is the inspiration for this memo that apparently self-destructed.

So what’s next? The testimony ticked Trump into a Tweetstorm. The public is half confused and half doesn’t even care anymore. Comey is probably looking for a new job while getting his overly tall suits hemmed. Three weeks from now no one will care about any of this.

I’m starting to believe politics is really a poorly scripted reality show, with horrible characters, on MTV – kinda like Teen Mom.

There is an obvious pattern in countries that are full of refugees. Generally, there is a surge in child rape, genital mutilation cases, and terrorist attacks. And, because of political correctness, it is called Islamaphobia to point out the obvious correlation. Thankfully, there are leaders around the world including the Untied States that is taking this Islamic takeover seriously. Which is why Muslims in one country are raging mad after a new law is passed that forces them to assimilate.

Many countries have tolerated the Muslim refugee crisis and their archaic ways. One of those customs is that women must be fully covered and wear a burqa to cover their face. However, with the increase of terror attacks, many countries have looked into banning the burqa. If you remember correctly, France has attempted this ban and even Germany has considered implementing one as well.

But, Austria is one country that is going all in on it, and that is not the only thing are doing. The Austrian government has passed a law that bans people from covering their faces. Also, this law requires these refugees to take Austrian integration classes, including German language, culture, and customs.
But, wait there’s more.

If these Muslim refugees do not take these classes then they are not able to receive any welfare benefits either.

Here is more from RT:

A controversial integration law that will fine women for wearing face-concealing Islamic dress from October, and deprive of benefits migrants who fail to take language lessons has officially been enacted, after being rubberstamped by the President.
“Those who are not prepared to accept Enlightenment values will have to leave our country and society,” reads the text of the law that drew thousands of protesters to the streets earlier this year, before it was passed by a centrist coalition last month.

Women who will wear Islamic veils – either the burqa or the niqab – in public places, will face a fine of €150 ($168).

More generally, newcomers who expect to stay in Austria, will need to enroll in a 12-month “integration course,” which includes German language lessons, if they are to receive their welfare benefits.

They will also be expressly forbidden from distributing incendiary radical materials, and are encouraged to volunteer before they can get their work permits, so that they are better prepared for life in the workplace.

More than 90,000 people have arrived in the Central European country since the start of the migrant crisis in 2015, most of them from Muslim-majority countries outside of Europe.

The law was opposed by the left-leaning Green Party, which said that it scapegoated refugees, and the nationalist Freedom Party, which called it a window-dressing for deeper integration issues and said it had been designed to stop its rise in the polls.

The centrist coalition promised that the legislation would offer a holistic approach. It has since collapsed, triggering an early election in October.

“Work is one of the most important factors for successful integration, which is why we are not only breaking down language barriers with this policy – we are also creating a continuous integration concept for the first time,” said Social Democratic politician Alois Stoger back in May.

France was the first EU state to introduce a similar ban in 2010, levying an identical €150 fine. It has since been copied in other countries, including Germany, which has also pushed through a prohibition of face coverings for state employees.

The left has been doing their best to sell that Islam is a religion of peace to the American people. Even after the numerous terror attacks around the world these leftist idiots still claim that this is just the actions of a few bad apples. While the rest of know that this is a blatant lie, there are those in America that have bought into the Islamic sham. So, those that have bought into this insanity are now advocating for Sharia Law to be implemented in America. Well, this past weekend, there was Anti-Sharia Law protests popping up across the country. Of course, leftist nitwits decided to attend and show support for these Islamic terrorists. However, these Islamic supporters received one hell of a surprise from the police they won’t soon forget.

During the Obama administration, there was a new brand of “tolerance” that swept over America. Barack Obama pushed for the citizens of our country to accept violent Muslim practices as the new normal. However, we were not about to let this happen and are pushing back against this sick religion.

For example, conservatives gathered together this past weekend to protest genital mutilation, honor killings and other practices associated with Sharia law, as part of the nationwide “March Against Sharia.”
Ok, this is where the insanity really begins to show folks.

We as conservatives are standing up against a barbaric religion that mutilates young women, advocates for the murder of homosexuals, and oppresses women. However, we are the ones that are crazy.

As we are aware ANTIFA, Black Lives Matter, and other leftists groups have been physically attacking conservatives at rallies. This time though they were given a karmic lesson they soon won’t forget.

During a Seattle protest on Saturday, when leftists attempted to break through the conservative side they were promptly smacked down. But, what pissed off these crybaby leftists is that the police allowed it to happen.
Check out the whining from the liberal rag BiPartian Report:

An individual from the aforementioned Seattle counter-protest who served as a marshal says that Seattle police allowed far-right demonstrators to physically harass members of the counter-protest with no repercussions.

The marshal, who has chosen to remain anonymous, says that the marshals’ jobs were “to facilitate the counter protests march to and from City Hall Plaza and help work to de-escalate situations and keep participants safe throughout the duration.” The individual adds that the marshals for the counter-protest, who were people from the “Greater Seattle General Defense Committee” along with other local organizations, met with representatives of the Seattle PD before the day’s events got underway.

Still, this counter-protest marshal alleges, when members of the Alt-right hit members of the counter-protest in the face after being prevented from mingling with the protest, police simply ignored it.

This marshal alleges that after she “immediately went to them” and identified herself as a marshal for the counter-protest and asked for the police’s assistance, she was “met with a response” that she characterizes as “If you aren’t letting them march through your crowd, then we can’t stop them from hitting you.”

Oh, but that is not all that happened. There are reports that Seattle police used pepper spray on these leftist trolls from trying to start more fights. But, somehow to these liberal bridge trolls conservatives are the ones that are evil and intolerant.

Give me a break already.
While that was happening in Seattle there were similar incidents in other parts of the country. In North Carolina, police were seen pushing back leftists mobs as they inched closer to the Anti-Sharia marchers.

I am not sure how this is so hard for people to understand.

There have been vicious attacks perpetrated by radical Muslims and we are trying to protect our country. These people do not want to assimilate to western culture so they don’t belong here.

Our country was founded on the principals of freedom and liberty. Sharia Law does not follow those principals at all. Their system of government is oppressive and does not mesh with our constitution. If they so badly want to live that way they have the whole middle east to practice their barbaric religion in.

This is just what the world needs. Another damn Clinton Foundation!

It seems like former President Barack Hussein Obama’s brother Malik Obama may have received a check by accident which might prove what the former President has been up to since he’s been out of office.

By the looks of this check, As is always the case when it comes to Crooked Democrat politicians, it’s obvious there is some monkey business going on here.
This is probably the start of a slush fund operation like the now infamous Clinton Foundation which played a huge role in Crooked Hillary Clinton’s loss in the 2016 Presidential Election.

On top of the questionable donations, it was uncovered that the foundation was full of financial discrepancies and a number of irregularities in its tax records which could have violated state laws. During the early phases of her presidential run, Crooked Hillary Clinton was put under a microscope for the business model her family’s foundation uses. But the Clintons, being the crooks that they are all banded together to pushed back. They went as far as calling the foundation one of the most transparent organizations in the world. Keep in mind this is from the same people who redefined what “Sex” is during former President and world-renowned sexual predator Bill Clinton’s sex scandals that define his legacy as president during the 90’s.