Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Ivanka Trump had a special visitor at the White House this week. Joy Villa, who wore a pro-Trump dress to the Grammy Awards was warmly received.

The Sarah Palin blog reports:

Ivanka Trump Just Posed For A Photo With Joy Villa At The White House

Ivanka Trump posed with a special guest at the White House on Friday—conservative singer Joy Villa!
Villa made headlines after she wore a dress to the Grammy’s that had “TRUMP” emblazoned across the back.
Villa told Breitbart back in February that she wore the dress—which also said “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” down the front—that she wanted to challenge Hollywood’s “suppressive atmosphere.”

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
First lady Melania Trump has reportedly invited her husband’s supporters to join in on signing a card for his 71st birthday on Wednesday.

The first lady recently sent out an email which stated, “I need your help to make it a birthday my husband will never forget.”

“Our celebrations always include family and close friends. You have certainly proven yourself to be a loyal friend of my husband through your support of his positive vision to Make America Great Again and your unwavering commitment to the Republican Party,” the first lady’s email added.

“Friend, Donald will be glad to hear from friends like you who have meant so much to his and our Party´s success.”

Former first lady Michelle Obama also used to ask supporters to help celebrate her husband Barack’s birthday.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Loudmouth liberal actress Rosie O’Donnell’s hate for our president is no secret as she spews her despise at every chance she gets. However, she’s now taken that hatred for him even further after her private tie to a terrorist just got out. Now, it’s time for this windbag traitor to serve prison time which would be the best thing for her and America.

It’s one thing to hate the Commander-in-Chief, trash his family, including his young son, and run her slanderous mouth about Trump anytime a camera is in her face, but it’s another to be encouraging terrorism for the cause. Perhaps Rosie is so entitled after living years in the limelight to think that she’s untouchable and can do whatever she wants. However, things could and should get really bad for her, very soon now she ran her mouth a little too much and let her secret slip.

It’s become more evident to liberals that their attempts to impeach our president aren’t going to work as Comey’s testimony only vindicated Trump and proves the FBI leader to be a liar. The left is becoming desperate and even more deranged as we’re seeing this week when the truth came out about White House leaker with a strange name, Reality Winner. Turns out, Winner is a big loser and was just denied bail when another unfortunate connection she has came out and Rosie was first in line “help.”
“Reality Winner was arrested last Saturday after she was identified as the illegal source of classified information given to the left-leaning investigative website The Intercept,” Washington Feed reported. “Immediately upon her arrest, hordes of liberals jumped up to offer their support. The 25-year-old blonde beauty from Texas was assumed to be a whistleblower and a hero.”

Rosie was one who spearheaded the support for this traitor after seeing an opportunity to stick it to her presidential nemesis but took it into a treasonous territory of her own. Winner’s bail was denied on the unfortunate discovery that she has ties to the Middle East and is known to have radical beliefs. Apparently, this, along with her leaking information against the President of the United States, makes her a “brave young patriot” in Rosie’s eyes, who also put her own money where her big mouth is – inadvertently supporting terrorism since Winner does.

Rosie immediately pledged $1,000 to the cause of freeing terrorist-tied winner and has been publicly encouraging others to as well through promoting a GoFundMe charity page for the NSA leaker.
Washington Feed has more:
“However, in their zeal to support anything that is anti-Trump, liberals such as O’Donnell ended up raising tens of thousands of dollars for a pro-Islamic terrorist.”

“There is a huge difference between being a patriotic whistleblower and a traitorous leaker. People like Dennis Montgomery and Edward Snowden are on one side and Reality Winner is on the other.”

“When Dennis Montgomery discovered that the FBI was illegally spying on Americans, he brought his concerns to his supervisors and eventually the U.S. court system. He is now suing James Comey for ignoring evidence of illegal spying and has been granted court protection.”

Winner doesn’t fall into the same category as these actual patriots, considering her motive and putting the country at risk, rather than trying to save citizens with her information leak. When the judge realized her ties making her motives for destruction evident, he rightfully denied her bail, since she’s no hero despite what equally corrupt people like Rosie claim.

Rosie and her deranged liberal army who thinks that they are making a stand and doing something great in supporting a traitor like Winner, makes them all enemies in the state. Investigators unearthed the leaker’s diary which held her darkest secrets and revealed her deep-seated hate for the United States. According to Business Insider, she expressed her plans to burn down the White House before fleeing to the Middle East to fight alongside Islamic State terrorists. This is who Rosie is raising money for and referring to as a “patriot” and “hero.”

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
CNN fired host Reza Aslan on Friday afternoon days after he called President Donald Trump a “piece of sh*t” on Twitter.

“CNN has decided to not move forward with production on the acquired series ‘Believer with Reza Aslan,’” the network said in a statement, according to Daily Mail. “We wish Reza and his production team all the best.”

Aslan apologized last Sunday after he made the offensive comment to slam Trump over his reaction to the London Bridge terrorist attack.
“When in the first few minutes of the terror attack in London, the President of the United States tweeted about his travel ban, I lost my cool and responded to him in a derogatory fashion,” Aslan added in a lengthier statement. “That’s not like me. I should have used better language to express my shock and frustration at the president’s lack of decorum and sympathy for the victims of London. I apologize for my choice of words.”

For a purportedly scholar of religion, Aslan’s profanity-laced rant against President Trump shows how deeply unhinged liberals have become in their collective dogma.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
A liberal law professor wrote a lengthy op-ed claiming President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate accord is a “crime against humanity” that is an “impeachable offense.”

“Trump’s withdrawal from the climate agreement constitutes an impeachable offense,” Marjorie Cohn, a professor emerita at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, wrote in an oped for Truthout published Thursday.

Trump announced he would make good on his campaign pledge to withdraw from the Paris accord last week, a decision which Cohn argues violates the public trust and constitutes a high crime.

Democrats and environmentalists argued Trump’s decision to withdraw from Paris ceded U.S. leadership on global warming to China and other countries. Cohn went further, saying Trump violated the public trust by condemning them to apocalyptic warming.

“The voters trust the president to act in their best interests and protect them from harm,” she wrote. “By withdrawing from the climate agreement, Trump is violating the trust that ‘We the People’ have placed in him.

“If the climate continues to change at a rapid rate, society itself will be injured. As the glaciers melt and the oceans swell, the land will recede. Crops will die,” she wrote.

“Mosquitos will increasingly carry diseases. The Earth will be hit with massive floods, devastating heat waves and drought. Polar bears will become extinct. People will lose their lands, their homes and their lives. Indeed, life as we know it will come to an end,” Cohn wrote.

That’s not all, Cohn also argues Trump’s Paris decision constituted a “high crime,” which the U.S. constitution lays out as a standard for impeachment. Cohn also says the 22 Republican Senators who signed a letter to Trump urging a Paris withdrawal had “aided and abetted” his “crime against humanity.”
“By withdrawing from the climate agreement and refusing to shoulder the United States’ share of responsibility for slowing climate change, Trump has intentionally committed an inhumane act that will ultimately cause great suffering to the people of the world,” Cohn wrote.

Cohn said Trump’s Paris agreement withdrawal could be tried before the International Criminal Court for “destruction of the environment.” She cites a report from the non-profit group Center for Climate Crime Analysis that “[c]limate crimes are often intertwined with other serious international crimes.”

“As a result of this link, as well through their impact on climate change, climate crimes may represent a threat to international peace and security and potentially affect all of humankind and the very foundations of civilization,” Cohn quoted from the group’s report.

Republicans largely supported Trumps’ withdrawal from the Paris accord, which the Obama administration joined in 2016. So, it’s unlikely they would impeach Trump for exiting an international agreement they didn’t support.

Trump had stayed in the Paris accord and implemented all the policies necessary to meet the Obama administration’s goal, it would have made no measurable difference to future global warming.

The Obama administration’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025 was only estimated to avert 0.03 degrees Celsius of projected global warming by 2100.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
It often seems as though House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi could be losing her grasp of reality and exhibiting signs of senility. Statements from the 77-year-old California congresswoman Friday only fueled those suspicions.

Pelosi began her day on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” where she repeatedly called into question President Donald Trump’s mental health and well-being. Funnily enough, she proceeded to have her own share of verbal misuses and appeared rather disoriented. She also seemed confused during her weekly media address later that morning, where she (again) confused Trump with former President George W. Bush.

After the “Morning Joe” crew asked Pelosi if she had advice for Trump, she suggested he get more sleep, The Wrap reported. She then suggested Trump’s family should be concerned about his mental health and questioned his fitness to hold office, among other disjointed attacks.
You can watch the painfully annoying segment below, with Pelosi’s incoherent attacks and contradictory statements all delivered with a look of perpetual surprise.

However, for all of her stated concern about the mental health of the president — it seems she may need to look in the mirror.

The Washington Free Beacon reported that during her weekly address to the media, Pelosi twice accidentally named Bush as the subject of a snarky attack, and ultimately needed to be corrected by an aide who quietly dropped a note on her podium.

“First, he tries to charm you,” stated Pelosi, regarding Trump. “President Bush tries to charm you. If that doesn’t work, he tries to bully you. If that doesn’t work, he walks away.”

A reporter interrupted to try and correct Pelosi by saying “Trump” after she mentioned Bush, but the former Speaker seemingly didn’t notice, continuing to prattle on.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Former FBI Director James Comey has really revealed himself to be of despicable character. The man went on a personal vendetta against the president of the United States. Now it’s cost him his career — but he keeps trying to slander Trump.

Mark Levin, one of the most respected voices on the Right, had some grueling words for Comey. The Senators that quizzed Comey were clueless, but Levin made clear that Comey’s now infamous “notes” of his conversations with Trump DESERVE investigation and could prove illegal activity.

First, Levin questioned the supposed innocence of the notes. Comey brought up the note-taking to defame President Trump. He wanted us to think Trump was such a shady character that poor little Comey had to protect himself by detailing every word he had with the president.

Levin didn’t buy it. He asked if Comey kept notes of his conversations with Obama; with members of the previous administration; with any members of Congress? For Levin, Comey wasn’t keeping notes for his own memory’s sake. He was doing it to gather information to THREATEN President Trump and others.

This goes along with another line of questioning Levin had for Comey: why did you agree to a conversation and meeting with Trump that you say made you uneasy? Comey said he felt it improper to meet one-on-one with Trump. Then why did he go to those meetings?

Comey tried to pass himself off as a naive little boy being bullied by big, bad, Donald Trump. It’s ridiculous! Comey knew exactly what he was doing. He met with Trump gladly — because he wanted to gather material to use against the president.
For this reason, Levin had some more questions he wished the Senators had asked. Was Comey ever in communication with the Hillary Clinton campaign? If he was, that would be indicative of a conflict of interest. It would be a major piece of evidence that Comey is an agent of the Democrats; an agent tasked with discrediting Trump.

And then there’s the question of whether Comey is breaking the law with his note-taking. No one on Capitol Hill is asking this, but it’s the nature of Comey’s notes that’s the real scandal lying under the surface.

Levin asks, “Did you tamper with, alter or destroy any of your notes, Mr. Comey, at any time? With whom did you share these notes, if anybody, Mr. Comey? Where are the original copies of these notes, Mr. Comey? Are they in your possession or the FBI’s possession?

“You understand, Mr. Comey, that if they contain classified or investigative information, and you shared them with anybody, that’s a felony? You also understand that if there’s any evidence in your notes stating or implying obstruction of justice — and you failed to report that to the attorney general of the United States — that you’ve committed a felony, Mr. Comey?” (via Any Politics).

Levin goes on to question whether Comey has shared his notes with anybody or leaked them to the press. If he has, and they contained classified information, that would also be criminal. Comey is truly digging his own grave with his note-taking gambit!

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
In the liberal world of Hollywood, it’s rare to find any entertainer that is brave enough to risk their career by defending President Trump in any way. KISS rocker legend, Gene Simmons spoke out to say that he is a proud Trump supporter and for those celebrities who continually attack the president using their public forum, Simmons tells them to stop their childish tantrums.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Tucker Carlson is without a doubt one of the most honest, straight-shooting people on TV. Carlson’s opening on his show last night left Democrats trying to pick their jaw off the floor.

Carlson spoke at length about former FBI Director James Comey’s first day speaking to the Senate Intelligence Committee (via Fox News). At this point, Comey has been exposed as a tool used by the Democrats for personal gain. Why was the former FBI Director so willing to listen to Loretta Lynch but leaked information on Trump?
Tucker asked some fantastic questions and made points that caused every patriot to nod their head in agreement. Comey admitted during the hearing that he had written out a memo about a meeting that he had with President Trump, gave it to his friend, and told his friend to leak the memo to the press. On the same exact note, Loretta Lynch told Comey that he needs to downplay the Clinton scandal — to call it a “matter” instead of an “investigation,” and he complied.
Carlson asked why he would be SO upset by President Trump that he would leak a memo, but not say anything about Loretta Lynch until now. It sure seems to us like the Dems have him in their back pocket, otherwise, he would have released that information before it got to this point.

No one seems to be talking about the fact that Trump made an EXCELLENT decision by firing Comey, now that the dust is starting to settle. Certainly, he was taking favors from the Democrats, which is NOT acceptable for anyone at the FBI. He should not have been in that position at all.

Once again, President Trump was proven right and removed ANOTHER rat from the government. Comey had no interest in helping our country; he was just following the orders of his Democrat overlords.

If Trump hadn’t removed Comey from his office, it is hard to tell just how far this would have gone. Luckily, we do not have to worry about finding out because it is OVER.

Carlson brought another interesting point about the president to light. Comey ADMITTED that President Trump was never under any investigation regarding Russia or the election. In other words, all of the nonsense we have heard on the mainstream media networks over the past couple months is all propaganda and an attempt to discredit the president.

It has been a witch hunt the entire time. There was no investigation, and the case alleging a Trump-Russia “collusion” is looking more absurd every day. You would think that if there were ONE BIT of evidence Comey, would have announced it when he was asked whether or not an investigation was currently underway.

We cannot allow the media to keep lying to us like this — it is DISGUSTING. Luckily, there are people like Tucker Carlson out there who report the FACTS and nothing more. Our country deserves to hear the truth. THANK YOU, Tucker.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Democratic Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz silenced CNN host Anderson Cooper yesterday by saying that James Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee showed no evidence that Donald Trump obstructed justice.

The Daily Caller reported that Dershowitz explained that the constitution allows for the president to direct an intelligence agent to stop or start an investigation at any time. As proof of this, he cited the fact that Trump could have easily pardoned former national security advisor Michael Flynn and the entire investigation would have been over anyway.

“Trump could have told Comey, ‘You are commanded, you are directed, to drop the prosecution against Flynn.’ The president has the right to do that,” he explained. “Remember also what the president could’ve done. He could’ve said to Comey, ‘Stop this investigation, I am now pardoning Flynn. That’s what President Bush did.”
Dershowitz then cited the case of Caspar Weinberger, who was pardoned by George H.W. Bush before he could be tried in connection to the Iran-Contra scandal.
“You cannot have obstruction of justice when the President exercises his constitutional authority to pardon, his constitutional authority to fire the director of the FBI, his constitutional authority to tell the director of the FBI who to prosecute, who not to prosecute,” the law professor said.
“You don’t believe he was trying to influence of impede any possible or further investigation into Flynn?” Cooper asked.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
We as a whole realized that President Trump settled on the correct decision in picking Nikki Haley as his Ambassador to the United Nations!

From the earliest starting point of her appointment, she has made it superbly clear to the U.N., as well as to the world, that the United States will at no time in the future endure their hostile to Israel inclination. In any case, now, she has given them the final ultimatum that should make them squirm.

On the off chance that the U.N. Human Rights Council proceeds with their outlandish predisposition against the country of Israel, at that point Nikki Haley has recommended that, with the president’s consent, the United States would soon be leaving and pulling back from this chamber. What a rude awakening for this liberal group!

From The Telegraph:

The Trump administration is considering withdrawing from the United Nations Human Rights Council over what the US ambassador described as its biased stance against Israel.

Campaign groups condemned the threat, saying America should get its own house in order before undermining the global effort to protect against human rights abuses.

But the council’s critical view of Israel has long been a source of contention in the US, Israel’s closest ally.

Nikki Haley, US permanent representative to the UN, on Tuesday told the 47-member forum it was undermining its own credibility by turning a blind eye to abuses committed by other countries.
The United States is looking carefully at this council and our participation in it. We see some areas for significant strengthening, “she said before the council at its Geneva headquarters.

She compared the case of Israel with that of Venezuela, where dozens of protesters have been killed during months of political turmoil yet which currently has a seat on the council.

“It’s hard to accept that this council has never considered a resolution on Venezuela and yet it adopted five biased resolutions, in March, against a single country, Israel,” she added. “It is essential that this council address its chronic anti-Israel bias if it is to have any credibility.”

What Ambassador Nikki Haley has said is the reality that this stuffy, no-great chamber expected to listen. In what capacity can this gathering call themselves the Human Rights Council in the event that they invest the greater part of their energy assaulting Israel and not denouncing different nations that are really harming their subjects. The lip service is psyche boggling.

Maybe if the United States really left this board, as well as the United Nations altogether, the loss of wage would be a sufficient hit to constrain an entire shutdown! We trust both President Trump and Nikki Haley to settle on the correct choice on if/when/how to pull back. Ideally within the near future!

What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.