“You keep shredding those [opt-out] forms” – Undercover in the LA Teachers Strike
PRESS RELEASE:
Julian Assange to Address Council of Europe Following Confirmation of his Status as a Political Prisoner
On October 1, Julian Assange will arrive in Strasbourg to give evidence before the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) which is scheduled to meet from 8.30am to 10am at the Palace of Europe.
This comes following the release of the PACE inquiry report into the Assange case, authored by Rapporteur Thórhildur Sunna Ævarsdóttir. The report focuses on the implications of his detention and its broader effects on human rights, in particular freedom of journalism. The report confirms that Assange qualifies as a political prisoner and calls on the UK conduct an independent review into whether he was exposed to inhuman or degrading treatment.
Sunna Ævarsdóttir serves as the General Rapporteur for Political Prisoners and is the Chair of the Sub-Committee on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights within PACE’s Legal Affairs Committee. She emphasises how Assange’s case is a high profile example of transnational repression. The report discusses how governments employ both legal and extralegal measures to suppress dissent across borders, which poses significant threats to press freedom and human rights.
Julian Assange is still in recovery following his release from prison in June 2024. He is attending this session in person due to the exceptional nature of the invitation and to embrace the support received from PACE and its delegates over the past years. PACE has a mandate to safeguard human rights and has repeatedly called for Julian Assange’s release when he was in prison.
He will give testimony before the committee, which will also hear the findings that his imprisonment was politically motivated.
The hearing marks Assange’s first official testimony on his case since before his imprisonment in 2019. His appearance before Europe’s foremost human rights and treaty-setting body emphasises the broader implications of his case.

Elon Musk Bans SWIFT From X/Twitter – ERASED!!
Elon Musk Bans Taylor Swift’s X Account, Causing Her to Lose Over 1 Million Followers and $72 Million
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 That was SWIFT 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Hilarious 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
A taste of Patriot Medicine
In an unexpected turn of events, Elon Musk, owner of the X platform (formerly known as Twitter), decided to ban the account of the famous singer Taylor Swift. This action has created a massive stir on social media and in the media, as Swift lost over 1 million followers within hours, in addition to suffering a significant financial blow, with an estimated loss of over $72 million.
Although the exact details behind the banning of Taylor Swift’s account have not been fully revealed, some reports suggest that Musk’s decision may be linked to disagreements over how the singer was using the platform.
elon-musk-bans-taylor-swifts-x-account-causing-her-to-lose-
t.me/EightQBall
There are some things being revealed right now that are not necessarily coming to light by Anons. The information about Sean P. Diddy Combs is being revealed organically, from inside that industry, and that’s worth noting. It’s more widely accepted by the masses than the research we produced about Epstein several years ago.
So much of what we uncovered about Epstein and his clients was denied by the players involved and our work was largely dismissed as crazy conspiracy theories. Why? What does that mean? It means the players Epstein serviced knew the game, had more assets in law enforcement and court circles, controlled main stream news coverage, and had power to make social media sites and search engines silence those of us that were exposing the facts.
But right now there is an intense amount of panic coming from Hollywood, the music industry, political circles and from professional athletes over Diddy’s arrest. His modus operandi seems to have included the utilization of sedating drugs and black mail video. The date rape type drugs being used by Diddy reminds me more of NXIVM’s Keith Raniere but the black mail video was surely one of Epstein’s tactics.
Sean P. Diddy Combs’ arrest has sparked a MASSIVE onslaught of media interviews, social media posts, news reports, and public accusations.
It’s different than what happened after Epstein’s arrest. Epstein had an extremely diverse client base. His guests included some of those that Diddy “entertained” but, Epstein also seems to have dealt more with trafficked, underage victims. And his customers included royalty, presidents, and other world leaders. Diddy only seems to have really reached politicians like the Obamas and their inner circle compared to Epstein having numerous politicians, presidents, judges, lawyers, and British royal family members.
The differences in reactions to Diddy compared to Raniere and Epstein are based on their clients. Diddy was careless and drew mostly wealthy people without power. Raniere was brainwashing. But Epstein was entertaining the most powerful people in the world. Now the seal has been broken by Diddy’s arrest. People are waking up, they’re listening, and they’re shocked.
It’s time to bring your Epstein caches of evidence and research back into the spotlight. Strike while the iron is hot and while people are open to the truth.