Barack Obama had a goal in mind when he pushed and bribed states to implement the new curriculum called Common Core. That goal was to push Islam onto our children and begin the indoctrination of our entire country. Many parents stood against this curriculum years ago and fought but not enough of us were aware nor did many want to even hear about it. As one of those parents myself, this attack on our educational system is what led me to homeschool my own children. After the push of this dangerous curriculum then it was onto the mass infiltration of migrant Muslim children to further push the schools to adopt policies that were NEVER needed before.

Well, now with President Trump in our corner, parents are now fighting back, and we are actually winning again.

Watch how one California family is dealing with the corrupt policies in his children’s school.

According to Red Nation Report:
A legal group and six parents have filed a lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of a San Diego Unified School District plan to protect Muslim students from bullying. “It’s our position that the anti-bullying policies should protect all students regardless of ethnicity and affiliation, and they shouldn’t be singling out any religious group for special treatment, as they seem to be doing here,” said Charles LiMandri, president and chief council for the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which filed the lawsuit in federal court Tuesday on behalf of the parents.
In April, trustees in the districts voted to create a policy that would protect Muslim students from bullying by, among other steps, increasing lessons about Islam. Students already learn about Islam and other religions as part of a social studies curriculum set by the state, but additional lessons could be added to create a better understanding of the religion, district staff members explained.

LiMandri and others who have objected to the policy said they are concerned the lessons could cross the line separating church and state. The anti-bullying policy is part of a larger effort the district has adopted to make campuses safe for all students. Anti-bullying policies also have been created for LGBT students and students who are Native American and Latino. The latest anti-bullying step was the first to focus on a religion and was sparked by a 2015 Council for American-Islamic Relations Report that found 55 percent of American Muslim students surveyed in California had said they were bullied because of their religion.

The district didn’t have data about how many of those incidents happened in its schools, but a report to the board in April did note that there were seven incidents of bullying between July 1 to Dec. 31, 2016, although it didn’t specify which religion was targeted. “That’s a relatively small number and it does not warrant or justify a wholesale change in the school district or its curriculum,” LiMandri said. “It appears to us that this is a politically correct type of solution looking for a problem,” he continued. “If Muslim students are being bullied, stop the bullying. But you don’t need to implement a program that is favoring Muslim students or one religion over another.”

The latest studies show that it is a FACT that when a city implements and applies the proper immigration laws that crime rates do in fact drop. That is not a racist statistic, nor a false one. Phoenix, Arizona has seen quite a drop in crimes since walking away from the Sanctuary city status and have no choice but to admit that it is due to the fact that most illegal immigrants are illegals because of criminal lifestyles and when they no longer have sanctuary they tend to stop committing so many crimes in order to stay off of the radar.

According to Fox:

At the center of national debate, a question remains unanswered: Are sanctuary cities that protect illegal immigrants safer than non-sanctuary cities? Sanctuary supporters claim they are. “Police chiefs across the nation believe that enlisting local police to enforce immigration law is a bad idea,” California Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De Leon, a Democrat, claimed at a news conference last week. “Having [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] pluck criminals out of jail and send them across the border or wherever they came from only to come right back endangers our communities.” But is that true?

And at least one city, Phoenix, saw a drop in crime after it eliminated its sanctuary city status, according to former law enforcement officials. Yet, some 200 cities nationwide adopted sanctuary policies and lawmakers propose to make California a sanctuary state. While the statute is opposed by the statewide county sheriff’s association, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck supports the bill that would prohibit local police from cooperating with ICE requests for information on illegal immigrants in custody.

“We do not want to dilute trust because trust is the most important thing in policing,” said Chief Beck. “We depend on our communities, particularly our immigrant communities to cooperate with us, not only to keep them safe but to keep all of you safe.” Beck and De Leon were joined by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. They oppose two bills passed Thursday by the House. One measure – named Kate’s law after a young woman who was killed by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times – stiffens punishment for people who re-enter the US illegally. The other strips some federal dollars from “sanctuary” cities that refuse to cooperate with ICE.

Kate’s law is named after Kathryn Steinle, right, who was allegedly killed by Francisco Sanchez, left, who was deported five times. (AP) In the eyes of Levi Bolton, executive director to the Arizona Police Association, that would be a mistake. In May 2008, Phoenix reversed itself, becoming a non-sanctuary state. Under the policy, police had full discretion to ask suspects about their immigration status and had the freedom to call ICE.
Take that California! I predict that now that funding will be drastically cut too many of these so-called sanctuary cities that they will start allowing their police to cooperate with ICE agents in rounding up these criminals and getting them out of our country and upon doing so they will all see a dramatic drop in crimes across the board. More Winning!

President Trump posted a short video to his Twitter account on Sunday in which he is portrayed wrestling and punching a figure whose head has been replaced by the logo for CNN.

The video, about 28 seconds long, appears to be an edited clip from a years-old appearance by Mr. Trump in WrestleMania, an annual professional wrestling event. The clip ends with an onscreen restyling of the CNN logo as “FNN: Fraud News Network.”

Oh California. A state so messed up that they provide nearly free education to illegal immigrants rather than American Citizens in their state Universities, a state so over run with debt, companies’ can’t leave fast enough because of the taxes and regulations, and where an illegal immigrant knows they can go to mooch of the state, collect all sorts of goodies, and roam about with the knowledge that the state of California will protect them from breaking the law, i.e. sanctuary cities.

However, all of that is soon coming to an end. The House of Representatives just passed the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act. This means that California will have two choices. One, cooperate with the Federal Government and eliminate sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants, and help the feds deport these criminals. Two, choose not to follow the law and you receive no more Federal grants from Uncle Sam. For cash strapped state like California, the loss of these Federal grants would be the nail in the coffin for them financially. I suppose California officials have a third choice, raise taxes again, but I think the citizenry might have an issue with that, and they may simply just leave the state. Why anyone would want to live there or have a business there is beyond me.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary hit the nail on the head when he stated, “The word ‘sanctuary’ calls to mind someplace safe, but too often for families and victims affected by illegal immigrant crime, sanctuary cities are anything but safe”. The loony left in California does not care about protecting the citizenry. They want the illegal immigrants so they can use them time and again for their various schemes, including voter fraud. President Donald Trump is doing what he promised and putting America first, something California politicians have yet to pick up on. After The House of Representatives passed the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act, President Trump stated the following; “Innocent Americans are suffering unthinkable violence as a result of these cities’ reckless actions … the implementation of these policies will make our communities safer. Opposing these bills, and allowing dangerous criminals back into our communities, our schools, and the neighborhoods where our children play, puts all of us at risk.”

The best part about this law, and Kate’s Law, named after Kate Steinle, who was killed by an illegal immigrant in the sanctuary city of San Francisco, will not provide very much room for the loony liberal judges in California to circumvent the law. Sure the California Attorney General can challenge the law but what is his argument to the Supreme Court going to be? That California should get a special exception to break Federal law along with other sanctuary cities. I’m sure that sound legal argument will go over real well.

Getting into the specifics of these laws, as reported by Katrina Willis from The Daily Signal, “One bill, Kate’s Law “enhances the current maximum sentences for illegal reentry into the United States, serving as a strong deterrent for deported felons seeking to come back to the United States,” according to its sponsor, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va. It passed 257-167. The other bill, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, deems sanctuary jurisdictions, cities, and states that do not cooperate with immigration officials or enforce immigration laws, ineligible for certain types of federal funding. That passed 228-195”. I would even go one step further and put a provision in the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act or Kate’s Law, that any state official that does not comply with either law can face a jail sentence of up to 5 years and a fine of $250,000. Other than taking away Federal money, there needs to be some real consequences. You know those things that most Democrats think don’t apply to them in their world.

President Donald Trump ran for office saying that the federal government spends too much. And now, with his own budget, he is leading the way by cutting spending in the White House and saving the American taxpayers a projected $22 million.
The savings come from a cut in the amount spent on Michelle Obama’s budget as First Lady, an end to the large number of “czars” and so-called “fellowships” that Obama employed, and a smaller White House workforce, Forbes magazine reported.

After the White House released its annual budget report last week, Adam Andrzejewski, president of government watchdog group OpenTheBooks.com, compared the newly reported budget to the last two years of the Obama administration.
Andrzejewski (pronounced And-gee-eff-ski) noted that there are now 110 fewer White House employees since Obama left office, saving nearly $5 million alone. Also, the First Lady’s staff has been cut from 24 staffers to only five. Michelle Obama entered the White House with a staff of 22 costing nearly $2 million annually, up from the $1.4 million spent during the George W. Bush era.

Another area of savings was the elimination of the so-called policy “czars” with which Obama stocked the White House staff. The Trump budget shows not a single “czar” employed for 2017.

The FCC has been put on notice to investigate the fake news station, CNN, for it’s corrupt and foul misuse of freedom of the press. CNN has knowingly falsified stories time and time again and they presumed that no one would reach a point of saying enough is enough. Well, guess what CNN? We have all had enough.

Nothing is as disgusting to me as false rumors and propaganda being passed off as journalism. As a journalist myself I will be lodging a complaint with the FCC to ensure that CNN is held accountable for their underhanded and shady broadcasting.

With the proof provided by Project Veritas and NUMEROUS CNN employees admitting that many stories are fake we should have enough evidence. Couple that with the statements from these reporters that said that Trump supporters have “s*** for brains,” it shouldn’t be too hard to get them severely punished and hopefully taken off the air. They have discredited the world of honest journalism to the point of no return and it is an absolute travesty!

According to Red State Watcher:

Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC) President Dan Weber has filed a formal complaint with the FCC asking them to look into CNN’s broadcasting of false information. The complaint was filed after damning footage of Van Jones and producers saying the Russian-hacking story is a fraud. Weber wrote the following in a press release:
[I]t became clear CNN personnel are violating FCC rules by ‘knowingly broadcasting false information.’ It is the FCC’s chartered duty to prevent broadcasters from knowingly airing false information, and that’s why I am filing a formal complaint with the agency. I further call on all Americans concerned with the preservation of truth and civil, democratic discourse to join me and the Association of Mature American Citizens by filing their own complaints with the FCC.
Lodge a complaint here at consumercomplaints.fcc.gov
I fully support Trump and all of his tweets regarding CNN and the fake news they panhandle to the liberal left in the hopes of keeping the distraction going and furthering their ratings. Which they are failing at by the way. In May of this year Fox News took the lead in the ratings and CNN is still blistering from it. We can only pray and pitch in by calling and emailing the FCC in mass to get them shut down for good so that legitimate news sites can muster together and save the integrity of honest reporting.

The unbiased side of it all doesn’t really bother many of us in all actuality. There are conservative sites that only write conservative leaning articles and there are liberal sites that do the same but most of them stick to the facts and verify every story being put out. CNN doesn’t even bother to stay honest when being bias. They have been know to make up stories FOR the left to paint the liberal agenda as innocent in all things and that is the farthest from the truth.

Allen West thinks we should not celebrate Fourth of July.

Fourth of July is technically meaningless says Allen West. The Fourth of July is a day like any other. Instead, we should celebrate INDEPENDENCE Day, which happens to fall on the fourth day of the seventh month. (via Allen B. West)

Independence day is the holiday that we gather to celebrate. Calls to celebrate the Fourth of July are part of the long term strategy of the liberal elite desperate to make us forget our history.

Allen West claims the difference between July Fourth and Independence day is subtle, but very important.

It should be clear by now that liberals have been taught to hate our nation, and everything it stands for. Liberals reject our history as a colony, and ignore the accomplishments of the great people who forged our great nation.

While serving as president, Barack Obama undermined our history, and the values that unite us. He spent eight years apologizing for our past, and denounced the “arrogance” of our country.

Shortly before leaving office, Obama made sweeping changes to the Oath of Allegiance. New legal immigrants are no longer required to vow to defend America.
Liberals have been convinced by the Marxist education system and globalist media that America is the source of all the world’s problems — now, brainwashed youngsters think that our country was never great.

The media and schools want us to forget our history. They want us to celebrate the Fourth of July, and forget about Independence Day, and the remarkable history that created the unprecedented prosperity we enjoy. Liberals want to make the day about hot dogs, and not history.

Symbols of national pride are dismantled, and declared racist or sexist. Schools have stopped teaching students to stand in attention with hand-over-heart during the national anthem. The Pledge of Allegiance has been relegated to a relic, and many schools reject the pledge.

Liberals want Americans to be residents, and not patriots. It’s much easier to promote a globalist agenda after national pride has been stamped out.

Why does Mexico want to make it so easy for its citizens to leave their country and immigrate into the the United States? Are these illegal immigrants criminals or people who are largely unemployable they are trying to get rid of?

There’s obviously a problem here in that it certainly does not speak well of a nation when sizable numbers of their citizens are willing to risk arrest in the United States just to get out of Mexico? Why is Mexico engaging in this act of self-humiliation?

Anyway, sanctuary cities in the U.S., which are desirous of hiding illegal immigrants from federal border control authorities are suing Texas to overturn the law that makes such actions by local officials a crime in Texas. Mexico has just filed a brief with the court in support of the position of the sanctuary cities.

It sounds like Mexico wants nothing to stand in the way of their getting rid of some of their citizens, whatever their motivation might be for such a position.

“Mexico filed an affidavit Monday in support of a lawsuit against the implementation of a Texas law to punish sanctuary cities and allow police officers to inquire about the immigration status of someone they have arrested or detained.

“The Mexican government said in a statement that the law could increase racial discrimination and create an environment of persecution.
“The statement said that the number of calls to the center for information and assistance for Mexicans in Texas in May and June increased 678 percent compared to the year prior. This is reflexive of the uncertainty and ‘anguish’ that the Mexican community in Texas has felt due to the law.”

There you go. When all else fails, play the race card: “[T]he law could increase racial discrimination.”

Race is irrelevant in this case. Mexicans and other Hispanics are most welcome to apply to enter the country legally, and many do.

If Mexico were such a desirable place to live, you would think Americans would want to pour into the country. But apart from a couple of nice vacations spots Americans visit briefly, that is certainly not what is happening.

Perhaps the best conclusion would be to presume that Mexican leadership is offended or insulted by the fact that the U.S. might find some of their citizens to be undesirable residents in the United States. They might go so far as to accuse us of racism, which has nothing to do with it.

First Lady Melania Trump rarely involves herself in the gossip that surrounds her husband, President Donald Trump, but Mika Brzezinski went too far. Brzezinski, who is the female half of the low-rated Morning Joe show on MSNBC, turned her anger on the first lady, trash-talking Melania on live TV, and this time, Melania said “enough,” giving Mika a nasty surprise she won’t soon forget.

Melania Trump has stayed out of the fray of all the ugliness surrounding those who hate her husband Donald Trump. Mika Brzezinski and her fiance and co-host Joe Scarborough have waged a war against the president on their Morning Joe show. Daily, the lowly-rated duo spews lies and hatred about Trump, attacking him personally. Finally, the president had enough and fought back through his Twitter account, outing them as enemies to his agenda to make America great again.

Mika trashed the first lady in an In Style interview, saying, “I know Melania. I haven’t talked to her in months, but if my gut is right, I don’t think she’s going to put up with it much longer. I know nothing. That’s just my instinct and I go with my gut and my gut’s always right.” She continued, “I’m just telling you, Melania’s got the worst job in the country and I don’t think she wants (to) do it a lot longer. I think she will do it for as long as she has to for her son, and that’s it.”

Wow, she seems to think she has a special gift she calls “her gut feeling” that can tell the future and that gut feeling is always “right.” This woman is clearly whacked out of her mind over her sick hatred for the Trumps. Don’t worry, Melania heard Mika’s ravings loud and clear and she perfectly responded to the nutty Morning Joe host. Poised and nonchalantly she said, “Do I know you?” referring to the obviously misguided Mika.

It was the perfect comeback, dismissing Mika like a piece of trash you throw away. Melania was making it clear to Mika that she shouldn’t presume to speak about her like she knows her. It’s as if Melania told Mika, I am the First Lady of the United States and you are a lowly rated political hack.

The first lady then made a statement, “It’s sad when people try to further their own agenda by commenting on me and my family, especially when they don’t know me. We have thick skin, and we know that people will judge him and people will call names.”

Of course, the liberal nutjobs in the media take everything Melania says literally. With the “you don’t’ know me” comment, they quickly point out that Mika Brzezinski interviewed Melania once. Those with half a brain understand the meaning of “knowing” someone, as in, Mika claiming her gut feelings know what the first lady will do in the future. Melania was pointing out that Mika is a nobody who doesn’t know her on that level and never will.

It’s no wonder Mika Brzezinski hates the Trumps since they stand for everything her father hated. Mika Brzezinski’s father Zbigniew Brzezinski was one of the leading globalists who actually said he wanted a “one world government.” The elder Brzezinski showed his fondness for Marxist ideology, and in 1970, seven years before becoming President Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor, Brzezinski wrote Between Two Ages. The book laid out his plans for bringing about an incremental world government. Between Two Ages became the blueprint for the globalist Trilateral Commission, which was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller with Brzezinski becoming its first director.