And once again the lawmakers from the Looney Liberal state of Kalifornia have taken it upon themselves to dictate policy to what is the real America!

When Liberal lawmakers in California can’t accept a fact that doesn’t agree with their skewed world views they do what all Liberals who can’t win at the ballot box do. They resort to using the liberal courts, which have been stacked with liberal judges who are known for taking it upon themselves to legislate from the bench in order to shove their Liberal agendas down our collective throats.
Last week California expanded it’s state-sponsored travel ban to include eight American states over LGBTQ123XZZ rights to use the ladies room. But now they have gone a step further by declaring an all out war on individuals and contractors who work on President Trump’s proposed border wall. But the best part about this two-pronged attack to go after those who California lawmakers disagree with is that it only hurts the state of California and its citizens who can hardly keep their heads above water as it is.
The Mercury News Reports:

California bill would blacklist contractors involved in U.S.-Mexico border wall project
SACRAMENTO — Contractors would have to choose between building a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico and doing business with California under a legislative proposal that advanced in the Senate Tuesday.

As California continues to fight the Trump administration’s agenda, Senate Bill 30 by Sen. Ricardo Lara, D-Bell Gardens, would blacklist companies who help to build the controversial border wall that President Donald Trump has promised to build — a project estimated to cost more than $20 billion, funding the president has yet to secure.

“It is not enough to simply oppose this wall in theory,” said Lara, calling this a “defining moment” for California.

U.S.-Mexico border wall fight: California considers divesting from companies building it
SB 30 is one of two bills taking aim at contractors who choose to work on the border wall. Assembly Bill 946 by Assemblyman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, would force the state to drop its pension investments in any companies involved in the project.

Hundreds of companies have expressed interest in border wall-related construction projects, including a number in the Bay Area, but the government has not released the number of bids it received before the deadline earlier this month.

Lobbyists for contractors spoke out against the bill Tuesday at a hearing of the Senate Committee on Governmental Organization, saying it would create a slippery slope.

Travel ban: Now officially in effect as Hawaii files first court challenge
“This is precedent setting,” said Todd Bloomstine, of the Southern California Contractors Association. “What next unpopular project would we blacklist for contractors?”
The bill will be heard next by the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Sen. Bill Dodd, D-Napa, said that as a former contractor, he sympathized with those who felt they were caught in the political crossfire. But, he said, “I just believe at this point in our history we have to take a stand for something.”

The state of California is already struggling financially because they have mastered the fine art of driving away business, have outrageous unsecured pension liabilities, take in an unlimited number of illegals, and have the largest population in the nation who rely on taxpayer welfare to live.

The official federal poverty level in the US for a household of 4 was $23,850 in 2014. A family of four in California would need an average of more than $63,000 a year. That’s nearly triple the federal poverty level only to be able to cover its basic needs of food and housing. If you ask me the 63k number is a bit low still, the real number should be around the 80k mark.

Yes, folks, California isn’t just Hollyweird, Disneyland, Apple, and Google. In fact, California boasts both the richest people in the nation and the poorest people in the nation, all in one state. But luckily for the rich, they don’t even have to look at the poor because they don’t live anywhere near where the rich people live. So it works out fine and the rich California Liberals don’t need to face what their extreme Liberal policies have done to this once golden state and its people.

President Donald Trump has finally broken with tradition and not recognized June as the official LGBT Pride Month. OMG, How will we go on living?

His decision marks an end to both Clinton and Obama’s tradition of officially recognizing the month.

The Hill reports:

“While other members of Trump’s administration, including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, issued statements marking the month, Trump’s White House never officially acknowledged it.

Former President Bill Clinton was the first to declare June as LGBT Pride month, but the tradition didn’t continue under former President George W. Bush. The White House began recognizing the month again during former President Barack Obama’s administration.

The absence is surprising in part because of Trump’s apparent support for some gay rights on the campaign trail. Last October, he posed with a rainbow flag in Colorado. In July, he promised a mostly conservative crowd that “I will do everything in my power to protect our LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of the hateful, foreign ideology, believe me.“”

The sexual predator, President Bill Clinton first recognized it in 1999 in commemoration of the Stonewall Riots of late June 1969 as a way to deflect from his own issues with sex and interns in the oval office.
Wow, who would have thought Fidel Castro who had gays executed actually Marched in New York in 1969!

In a police raid during the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the reputed mafia owned Greenwich Village homosexual hangout “The Stonewall Inn” the second raid within a week, sparked off a two-hour melee as customers and villagers swarmed over the plainclothes cops. Before order could be restored, the cops were the targeted by having coins thrown at them, cobblestones and uprooted parking meters. Also, windows were smashed, a police van was nearly overturned and the

Before order could be restored, the police officers were targeted by having coins thrown at them, cobblestones, and uprooted parking meters. Also, windows were smashed, a police van was nearly overturned and the raided bar was fire-bombed it’s self. Because we all know there is no better way to secure social justice than to attack authority and vandalize a city. By the time all was said and done, three police officers suffered minor injuries and 13 people were arrested. Luckly the fire was quickly put out by the bar staff themselves.

History Reports:

STONEWALL INN
The crime syndicate saw profit in catering to shunned gay clientele, and by the mid-1960s, the Genovese crime family controlled most Greenwich Village gay bars. In 1966, they purchased Stonewall Inn (a “straight” bar and restaurant), cheaply renovated it, and reopened it the next year as a gay bar.

Stonewall Inn was registered as a type of private “bottle bar,” which did not require a liquor license because patrons were supposed to bring their own liquor. Club attendees had to sign their names in a book upon entry to maintain the club’s false exclusivity. The Genovese family bribed New York’s Sixth Police Precinct to ignore the activities occurring within the club.

Without police interference, the crime family could cut costs how they saw fit: The club lacked a fire exit, running water behind the bar to wash glasses, clean toilets that didn’t routinely overflow, and palatable drinks that weren’t watered down beyond recognition. What’s more, the Mafia reportedly blackmailed the club’s wealthier patrons who wanted to keep their sexuality a secret.

There’s a certain amount of spotlight that comes with being the first family, it’s just part of the job. The Trump’s have received even more than normal because of their less than traditional family and trip to the White House. This means that they bring unique strengths and weaknesses, but it also means that the whole world thinks that they’re fair game.

The President and First Lady and all of their children, step children, children in law and grandchildren have shown that they have an amazing bond and great working relationship. However, the world, with the help of the liberal media, has put them under a microscope, hoping against hope that they’ll find something to criticize them about. And if they don’t find anything credible, apparently they’ll make something up.

Everybody has an opinion on what is right or wrong about the first family, and that includes other celebrities. One such less than tactful individual is former legendary singer Cher. This has-been singer with her own set of family problems thought it would be a good time to share her unwanted opinion on the family in the White House. She has declared that they’re unhappy, Melania doesn’t want to be there and President Trump doesn’t actually love his son, Barron. Kinda seems like a lot to get from watching tv on the couch, but I guess that’s her opinion. Unfortunately for her, Melania doesn’t have anything to worry about in her marriage, and she’s taking the whole thing in stride.

Via Blasting News:
Melania Trump is getting as much attention for her reaction to the president’s tweet targeting “Morning Joe’s” Mika Brezinksi as he is for the vicious attack. Last year, she declared wanting to combat online cyber-bullying as a campaign she’d spearhead in her role as the First Lady. Six months into the #Donald Trump’s presidency, she hasn’t taken the initiative to move forward in that effort, possibly due to the backlash she’s received by virtue her husband is the biggest bully of them all on Twitter. If she can’t fix the problem at home, what makes her influential in fighting cyber-bullying?

Six months into the Donald Trump’s presidency, she hasn’t taken the initiative to move forward in that effort, possibly due to the backlash she’s received by virtue her husband is the biggest bully of them all on Twitter.
If she can’t fix the problem at home, what makes her influential in fighting cyber-bullying?

President Donald Trump has already taken huge steps to Making America Great Again!

Following a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court last week which gave the power to lower courts to strip the citizenship of immigrants who lied during the process of becoming a naturalized citizen. A court in Houston Texas did just that to a Mexico national who lied when applying for citizenship back in 1996.

Looks like a fine young “Dreamer” to me!
According to the Department of Justice this scumbag, Jose Arizmendi, when asked if he had ever been convicted of any crime other than just traffic violations replied “No.” But that wasn’t true. Just a few months before he had pleaded guilty in a Harris County court to aggravated sexual assault of a minor child which led to him accepted a 10-year probation deal offered by the local DA. He should have gone to prison for life if you ask me.

The Department of Justice Reports:

At the beginning of the week, the Supreme Court ruled that the travel restrictions, which President Trump was attempting to put into place, could go into effect. As you can imagine liberal’s heads were exploding. One particular liberal loon who seems to have lost his mind is the Hawaii Attorney General Douglas Chin.

Mr. Chin seems to not understand that no matter what he does, the Supreme Court has the final say. Mr. Chin, who does not believe in protecting Americans, and is only interested in making a name for himself within the Democratic party, (not necessarily a highlight) filed an emergency challenge to stop the decision of the Supreme Court, even though the travel restrictions the Supreme Court ruled on went into effect as of Thursday June 29th, 2017.

The travel ban, or restrictions, which ever way you choose to call it, allows the United States Government to put in place a 90 day ban on travel for those individuals’ coming from Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Specifically, if the traveler does not have close family ties or established business relationships in the United States, they are subject to being denied entry into the United States. Makes sense right? To not allow people into our homeland that may want to kill us? Well not for the loony left and folks like Mr. Chin. They are under some sort of delusion that we should just let everyone in and be nice. Right. And we saw how well lazy travel restrictions have worked in the United Kingdom. And just so we are clear this travel ban does not affect those travelers’ who already have a valid green card or visa. This travel ban affects people from Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, with no legitimate and established connection in the United States, who may want to kill Americans.