Liberals Furious Over What Jim Mattis Just Did to Obama’s “Trans Soldiers” Order

View on YouTube Liberals Furious Over What Jim Mattis Just Did to Obama’s “Trans Soldiers” Order
Liberals Furious Over What Jim Mattis Just Did to Obama’s “Trans Soldiers” Order

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Well, folks, according to news reports, it looks as if an Obama-era mandate to allow transgender volunteers to serve in the military effective this summer has been delayed indefinitely, as senior military personnel from multiple branches of the armed forces continue to hold serious reservations about implementing the policy.

Per USA Today, on May 8, a memo from Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work ordered heads of the armed services to gauge the military’s “readiness to begin accepting transgender applicants on July 1, 2017.”

The Pentagon press office released a statement in response to the memo that read, “The Secretary is awaiting the input of Services on May 31. When he receives that input he will make decisions based on readiness needs.‎” The assessments Work ordered were due back by May 31.

And now, according to Military Times, the move is on hold “as senior leaders within each of the services voice lingering concerns about the Obama-era policy intended to end discrimination but dismissed by critics as social experimentation.”

“The personnel policies of this Department are designed to enhance the warfighting readiness and lethality of the force that protects our country,” Work wrote. “We do not intend to reconsider prior decisions unless they cause readiness problems that could lessen our ability to fight, survive and win on the battlefield.”
Interestingly enough, it’s the specifics within that language – particularly the use of the word “unless” – which has opened the door for high-ranking military officers to criticize the policy.

“This could be seen as an opportunity to reconsider the policy,” said Brad Carson, a top official for military personnel under Carter and primary advocate for rescinding the ban on transgender troops. “It is certainly possible, and it would invite litigation. I do have full confidence in (Defense Secretary) Jim Mattis to do the right thing here.”

Perhaps Carson was right. At first, it was unclear how Mattis would rule on the matter, but in the past, he had questioned where such a policy would actually advance the military’s principal national security objectives. And now, with an indefinite hold placed on the policy, it appears Mattis has utilized the use of the words “unless they cause readiness problems that could lessen our ability to fight, survive and win on the battlefield” within the memo, and turned it into an opportunity to disrupt its implementation.

Nicely done, Mr. Mattis.

Advertisements

GOP Senator Ruthlessly Destroyed His Đệm Colleague During Senate Intel Hearing

View on YouTube GOP Senator Ruthlessly Destroyed His Đệm Colleague During Senate Intel Hearing
GOP Senator Ruthlessly Destroyed His Đệm Colleague During Senate Intel Hearing

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) brutally suspended Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) from speaking during the Senate Intel hearing when she refused to let assistant attorney general Rod Rosenstein answer any questions.

Rosenstein was trying to explain why special counsel Robert Mueller cannot be fired by the president when Harris cut him off.

“Sir, if I may, the greater assurance is not that you and I believe in Mueller’s integrity…it is that you would put in writing an indication based on your authority as the acting attorney general that he was full independence,” she said.

Rosenstein looked annoyed during her entire question, and started to respond, “He has the full independence as authorized by those regulations,” before Harris stopped him again.

Burr wasn’t interested in allowing Harris to continue to interrupt the witnesses and cut off her speaking time so Rosenstein could finish his response.
The senator will suspend. The chair is going to exercise his right to allow the witness to answer the question,” Burr said to eye rolls from Harris. “The committee is on notice to provide the witnesses the courtesy, which has not been extended all the way across, extend the courtesy for questions to get answered.”

“Mr. Chairman, respectfully, I would like to point out that this witness…” Harris started yet again.

“Mr. Rosenstein, will you … the senator will suspend. Mr. Rosenstein, would you like to fully answer the question?” Burr offered.
Rosenstein looked relieved to finally have speaking time, and responded, “the truth is, I have a lot of experience with these issues and I could speak for a very long time about it.”

LOOK: Everyone Spotted 1 AMAZING Detail About Ivanka’s Outfit Today

View on YouTube LOOK: Everyone Spotted 1 AMAZING Detail About Ivanka’s Outfit Today
LOOK: Everyone Spotted 1 AMAZING Detail About Ivanka’s Outfit Today

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Just as lipstick won’t be of much help to a sow, the opposite equally applies.

Someone already in possession of beauty and poise doesn’t need couture fashion to bring out her best — it just naturally shines through on its own.

First daughter Ivanka Trump looked breathtaking when spotted leaving her Washington, D.C. digs Monday, but the outfit she was wearing wasn’t some hoity-toity label only affordable to the rich and famous.

The black and white number was an off-the-rack dress available from Target for the everyday price of $35, according to The New York Post.
It’s since been marked down to half-price in the store’s clearance section.

Although the press has given former first lady Michelle Obama passes for wearing multi-thousand dollar apparel, Trump — a wealthy woman in her own right — has been criticized for doing the same.

The Post reported:

Trump, who owns her own clothing brand, can also sometimes be seen sporting her own design, though that too comes with its share of criticism. In November, her company came under fire for promoting a $10,000 bracelet she wore during a “60 Minutes” interview, prompting critics to raise potential ethics issues involving the First Family and their business ties.

Because Trump’s father is president, liberals called for a boycott of her clothing line, which resulted in several retailers removing her items from their stores.

The boycott eventually failed, however, prompting a San Francisco-area clothier to sue her, claiming her brand gets an unfair advantage — because her father is president.

Without surprise, Trump received lots of hate for her attire, but also got her share of praise for her apparel — and for how she turned heads in it.

Share this post if you are proud of Ivanka Trump!

What do you think about this comment below.

BOOM: Harvard Law Professor Backs Trump, DESTROYS “Obstruction Of Justice” Narrative…

View on YouTube BOOM: Harvard Law Professor Backs Trump, DESTROYS “Obstruction Of Justice” Narrative…
BOOM: Harvard Law Professor Backs Trump, DESTROYS “Obstruction Of Justice” Narrative…

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Famed Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz shot down claims of obstruction of justice Wednesday, telling CNN’s Anderson Cooper that presidents have the right to start or stop any investigation.

Dershowitz said that, constitutionally, a president may direct an intelligence agent to stop an investigation. The “best proof” of that fact, he says, is that Trump could’ve easily pardoned former national security advisor Michael Flynn and the entire investigation would have been over anyway.

“Trump could have told Comey, ‘You are commanded, you are directed, to drop the prosecution against Flynn.’ The president has the right to do that,” he explained. “Remember also what the president could’ve done. He could’ve said to Comey, ‘Stop this investigation, I am now pardoning Flynn. That’s what President Bush did.”
Dershowitz cited the case of Caspar Weinberger, who was pardoned by George H.W. Bush before he could be tried in relation to the Iran-Contra scandal.

“You cannot have obstruction of justice when the President exercises his constitutional authority to pardon, his constitutional authority to fire the director of the FBI, his constitutional authority to tell the director of the FBI who to prosecute, who not to prosecute,” Dershowitz elaborated.

“You don’t believe he was trying to influence of impede any possible or further investigation into Flynn?” Cooper asked.

“What I’m telling you is that even if he did want it to impede it, and even if he did impede it, that is his constitutional power. He has the right to say, ‘You will not investigate Flynn.’”

SHARE on Facebook and Twitter if you agree with Alan Dershowitz!

BREAKING: NSA Leaker’s Parents Reveal Their Daughter’s SHOCKING Response

View on YouTube BREAKING: NSA Leaker’s Parents Reveal Their Daughter’s SHOCKING Response
BREAKING: NSA Leaker’s Parents Reveal Their Daughter’s SHOCKING Response

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
It’s great to finally see the government taking action against the loser leaking our nation’s classified information to the liberal media.

Reality Winner, the government contractor who leaked top secret information to discredit President Trump, was arrested. As repulsive as her actions were, her parents’ reaction to the arrest was infuriating. Her parents said she was “very scared” and didn’t expect to get caught at all!

Excuse me? So, you leak classified information for political reasons. You knowingly break the law. And when you’re caught, you’re surprised. Why does it not surprise me that a criminal Democrat is playing the victim card?

First of all, before we even get into this any further, can we all just agree “Reality Winner” is among the lousiest names you can give your kids? It’s no wonder she turned into a left-wing nut.

Winner’s parents, who are most likely adamant liberals themselves, appeared on Anderson Cooper basically asserting that the consequences their daughter is facing are “injustices”. As always with liberals, they want to turn Trump into the “bad guy.”

Her mother told Cooper that the 25-year-old leaker was “very scared” when they arrested her. No kidding? Was she supposed to be giddy knowing she was going to be locked away in jail for crimes against her country?

Mrs. Winner went on to say that the FBI agents who arrested her daughter took the young government contractor into a back room of her house. She added that the room was “never used.” What does that have to do with anything?
Obviously, the FBI agents had to discuss classified matters with Reality, so they needed privacy and requested a room to talk in privately. How were they supposed to know it was “never used?” Mrs. Winner wants to make us think they were Gestapo agents waterboarding their daughter in secret!

Then, the mother goes on to say that the FBI agents were “all armed.” Well, duh! They’re FBI agents! Of course they’re armed. This isn’t Britain where law enforcement has nothing more than night sticks to fight delinquents with! Again, she and Anderson Cooper are trying to portray Reality Winner as a poor victim of the “evil Trump regime!”

The fact is, Winner has no one but herself to blame. Trump isn’t even directly involved in this. The FBI is simply doing its job — taking action against a person who broke the law. This isn’t a political issue for them. Reality Winner would have been arrested for what she did no matter the administration in office. The law is the law!

Of course, that’s something Democrats can’t seem to grasp. They have no respect for law and order. They thrive in lawlessness and disorder. As long as they get their way politically, they don’t mind betraying their country’s secrets.

And when they suffer the consequences of their actions, liberals are ready to shift the blame onto others, casting themselves as the victims. It’s all predictable. Let them complain! Thank goodness these leftists are finally going to jail. Lock all of them up, President Trump! We’re behind you!

BREAKING: Congress Just HAMMERED Obama – They’re Taking Away His…

View on YouTube BREAKING: Congress Just HAMMERED Obama – They’re Taking Away His…
BREAKING: Congress Just HAMMERED Obama – They’re Taking Away His…

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
We previously reported that the company Cantor Fitzgerald will be paying Obama $400,000 to give a speech for their health insurance conference in September.

The size of Obama’s paycheck is frustrating to many Americans who don’t understand how Obama can rake in speaking fees while receiving a taxpayer funded pension as well.

Everyday Americans don’t receive Social Security if they are working. Shouldn’t the same rule apply to government employees?

Obama definitely doesn’t think so, and vetoed a bill last year that would have put a limit on the amount of money former presidents are allowed to earn if they want to keep receiving their full pensions.

Unfortunately for Obama, his veto may now be worthless.

From Angry Patriot:

Recently, Obama has been giving talks to Wall Street in return for large sums of money. As a response, Congress is going to introduce a bill which will curb a president’s pension if they take over $400,000 of outside money.
If this bill can get past Congress, President Trump is likely to sign it. It would be a huge step in the fight to stop politicians from trading their influence for money.

President Trump doesn’t have to worry about this bill affecting him in the future because he is rich on his own. It’s a large part of why he won the election!

Obama on the other hand has no problem accepting Cantor Fitzgerald’s bribe. All he’s been good for since becoming an ex-president is relaxing at various locations around the globe. The occasional speech money allows him to keep up his lavish lifestyle.

If Obama wants to follow in Hillary’s footsteps and work the speaker’s market, then his taxpayer funded Secret Service protection, salary and personal expenses should be cut.

Do you agree? Let us know in the comments below!

a part of the movement to Truth!

Advertisements