Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
A storm is targeting the Democratic National Committee.

Their lies and deceits have brought them to a corner.

Stay tuned, as we reveal more details.
According to our source Conservative Tribune, an attorney that represents Bernie Sanders backers is suing the DNC. The attorney referred to their actions as “the ultimate Ponzi scheme” and claimed that if the lawsuit goes any deeper they “expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct” regarding the revealed Hillary Clinton systemic bias in her 2016 presidential campaign.

In the case of Wilding v. DNC Services Corporation, we have Jared Beck, of Beck and Lee Trial Lawyers, who is representing the Bernie donors. According to him, the Bernie donors had imperialistic expectations when they made the donations.

Hacked Democratic National Committee emails however, claim otherwise. He said that those emails revealed how the organization is actually leaning towards Hillary Clinton. He also pointed out that Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former DNC head, attempted to interfere with the before mentioned case.

“If there is anything ‘new,’ it is the application of these principles to the sphere of political campaigns,” stated Jared Beck. “One might view this application as a natural consequence of Citizens United — an opinion that crystallizes campaign contributions as the quintessential form of American political participation. he added.

“By equating political participation with financial contribution, Citizens United, by inference, incorporates all of the common-law principles of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, etc. that typically govern in the economic sphere. Americans have a cognizable interest in the transparent and fair conduct of primary campaigns precisely because they, through their campaign contributions, are also financiers of the campaign.”

During the interview, Beck was very sharp with his opinion on the Democratic National Committee’s methods. “I would think of this as a case against the ultimate political Ponzi scheme,” said Beck. “We are used to the concept of Ponzi schemes in the investment world. In my view, the DNC is really no different: it was purporting to be ‘selling’ a fair primary process but in reality was serving as a front for the Hillary Clinton campaign. People lost well over $200 million as a result.” he added.

Beck also noted that his office actually received a mysterious phone call which number was linked to the Clinton functionary herself, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Reportedly, the caller was asking information regarding the case while using a voice changing software.

“The incident was startling at the time it happened and we are still very puzzled and concerned by it,” the attorney said. “The caller had altered his or her voice to be unrecognizable and refused to identify themselves. he added.

“But please understand that this is just one in a number of disturbing events that have occurred throughout the case … I have no idea who was behind the call, but according to the defendants, the matter has been referred to the Capitol Police,” Beck continued.

“If we do get to the discovery phase, I think it is safe to say that we expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct, with the publicly released material being only the tip of the iceberg,” Beck went on.

“Also, we will be able to place all of the material witnesses under oath and take their depositions. In addition, we will be able to conduct discovery on the question of how the DNC’s internal documents came to be placed into the public domain by Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, which may ultimately be the most important question of all.”

If these remarks are in fact true, this could mean the end for the Democratic National Committee. Well, it’s about time. Their lies have gone on for long enough.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
(Angry Patriot) – A now-exposed massive Obama-era scandal PROVES the Washington establishment is taking the money of hardworking Americans and throwing it at illegals. This is huge!

A new audit of the Social Security Administration (SSA) shows that the government paid $1 billion over the last ten years to individuals who don’t have a Social Security Number (via FOX News). Illegals are stealing Social Security benefits!

We’ve known for years that illegal aliens were receiving handouts under-the-table from the Federal government, but the Democrats consistently deny it. Now, there’s no way to hide the law-breaking that’s been going on!

A recent audit found errors in the documentation for representative payees–individuals who receive payments on behalf of someone else. THOUSANDS of cases were found to have no Social Security Number (SSN) on file.
Illegal aliens and the Democrats who support them have found a loop-hole they can abuse to give money to people who shouldn’t be in our country in the first place. The amount of money they’re stealing from taxpayers is incredible.

The total number of representative payees without an SSN was 22,426. That amounts to $1 billion! The auditor estimated that the loss of money would continue unless immediate action is taken to fix this issue:

“Furthermore, unless it takes corrective action, we estimate SSA will pay about $182.5 million in benefits, annually, to representative payees who do not have an SSN or paper application supporting their selection.”

Outrageous! We’re going to be losing $182.5 million a year! Imagine if we invested that money in real (read: legal) American citizens. We would see massive prosperity here at home. Instead, the money is fraudulently allocated to illegals who send most of it back to their home countries–and don’t pay taxes on what they keep.

This illegal activity calls for a massive clean-up of our Social Security program. The Social Security Administration is a hotbed of bureaucratic corruption like so much of the Federal government. Democrats have designed welfare so that it most benefits their target demographics, including the illegal aliens who help them commit voter fraud. Meanwhile, honest Americans have a hard time getting help.

American citizens do the work that keeps the country moving. We pay taxes that support schools, infrastructure, hospitals, and social welfare programs. But if you’re a law-abiding citizen, you have to go to hell and back to qualify for assistance when you need it. Illegal aliens, on the other hand, just show up and are handed benefits–no questions asked!

Leftists have created a backward system; a system that treats illegals better than our citizens. It truly is sickening that this has been going on for so long. And it’s not just Obama–plenty of RINO Republicans support this abuse, too. They’re all part of the same establishment.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
A new bombshell report from Breitbart News shows that accounts from his friends show that James Comey leaked WHILE he was FBI Director, not just after he was fired.

In addition, he lied when testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee when he claimed he had never been an anonymous source.

From Breitbart

James Comey may have misled senators on May 3, when he testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had never been an anonymous source in news reports related to the Russia investigation.

By that time, he had already leaked several private conversations he had with President Trump to his friend Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of the blog Lawfare and former editorial writer for the Washington Post.

Wittes wrote in a piece on May 18, only nine days after Comey was fired, that the former FBI director had shared those conversations “over the previous few months.” He wrote:

Comey never told me the details of the dinner meeting; I don’t think I even knew that there had been a meeting over dinner until I learned it from the Times story. But he did tell me in general terms that early on, Trump had ‘asked for loyalty’ and that Comey had promised him only honesty. He also told me that Trump was perceptibly uncomfortable with this answer.
Wittes also wrote that he had lunch with Comey on March 27, and that they discussed a phone call that Trump had made to him earlier in the day.

Wittes denied those conversations were leaks but were “just conversations between friends, the contents of which one friend is now disclosing.”

However, a leak is the release of unauthorized information, according to a definition by George Washington University professor and legal scholar Jonathan Turley. Incidentally, there is no condition that the information may be published or distributed via physical memo.

And Wittes is arguably a member of the news media. In January, Wittes published a piece on Comey in Lawfare, and he writes and publishes pieces regularly.

It would not have been unreasonable for Comey to think Wittes could publish a piece on their conversations in the future — which is exactly what happened.

Wittes not only wrote about the “loyalty” conversation with Trump in his May 18 blog post, titled: “What James Comey Told Me About Donald Trump,” he but he also wrote about contacting the New York Times as a source to share what Comey had told him. He also discussed contacting the New York Times in a Buzzfeed interivew.

The fact that Wittes did so only after Comey was fired does not change the fact that Comey shared his communications with Trump while he was still FBI director.

Comey’s leaking while still FBI director appears to have extended beyond Wittes.

Comey told senators on June 8 that he decided on May 12 to release his memos of his conversations with Trump to friend Daniel Richman so that he could leak them to the media to prompt a special counsel.

But that doesn’t explain who leaked to the New York Times the conversation about the “loyalty request” on May 11 — a day before Comey said he gave Richman memos of the conversation to leak to media outlets.

That Times story cited “associates,” or “two people who have heard” Comey’s account of the dinner and agreed to keep it quiet while Comey was director.

The Associated Press reported that a day before the New York Times story broke, Comey friend Daniel Richman had commented to the AP that the president had removed “somebody unwilling to pledge absolute loyalty to him.”

From those reports, it appears that Comey told both Wittes and Richman about the conversations while he was FBI director, potentially for the purpose of later leaking to the media.

Despite the leaking, Comey told the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 3, six days before he was fired, that he had “never” been an anonymous news source on “matters relating to” the investigation on the Trump campaign.
Here is a transcript of an exchange between Comey and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on May 3:

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
God bless this Trump Supporter.

He is 100% correct.

Everyone knows the media is making mountains out of molehills considering there is ZERO proof of Trump-Russia collusion.

It’s also a FACT that even Trump’s biggest detractors like James Comey admit the Russians did not change one single vote.

Time for BOTH the mainstream media AND Democrat sore losers to grow up.

From TheHill

A supporter of President Trump in Texas is using billboard space to slam ABC News over its coverage of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Kyle Courtney of Boerne, Texas, placed an ad saying he “grew up with” ABC News but they let him down with coverage of the scandal, which includes allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the election.

“ABC News: I grew up with you. We are through. The Russians didn’t elect Donald Trump. I did,” the billboard reads.

“ABC News was the only channel I watched as a child growing up in Texas but I think they have lost touch with America and forgotten the working man,” Courtney said in a statement, according to San Antonio’s NBC News affiliate. Boerne is a suburb of San Antonio.

Courtney accused the media of acting in “coordination” with Hillary Clinton‘s campaign during the 2016 election.

“Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign was funded by the Clinton Foundation in close coordination with the media, and now we’re seeing them try to fix what they couldn’t fix during the election,” Courtney said. “They are doing everything they can, night after night, to create narratives and sway people’s direction to impeach Donald Trump.”

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Johnny Depp often plays the character of a villain in his big screen Hollywood films, but now he just made himself one for real. Last night, when he made a media appearance to promote his new movie, he publicly fantasized about killing President Donald Trump instead in front of rolling cameras and a massive crowd of people at Cineramageddon in Glastonbury, U.K. Despite being overseas when he made his terroristic remarks against the president, that didn’t stop karma from catching up with him there, which he’s now waking up to this morning.

The aging actor hasn’t been in many movies lately, starring sporadically in hand-selected flicks that fit his vibe. You’d think he’d appreciate the work, considering that stars quickly fade with age and his days in Tinseltown were already numbered. Rather than sticking to his script when presenting his latest film, The Libertine, alongside director Julian Temple, he went off the rails and used his time at the podium for something else. Evidently, he didn’t learn from comedian Kathy Griffin who just recently did something similar and is still paying the price for it.

In front of 1,500 people at the event, Depp decided to use their captive attention to spew hatred for our president and promote assassination.

“I think he needs help and there are a lot of wonderful dark, dark places he could go,” Depp said. Since the crowd immediately responded with cheers, the actor was encouraged to continue with his disparaging remarks, and it only got worse.

“It is just a question – I’m not insinuating anything. By the way, this is going to be in the press. It will be horrible. I like that you are all a part of it,” he said, according to The Guardian. “When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?” he asked in reference to the death of Abraham Lincoln by John Wilkes Booth in 1865. “I want to qualify, I am not an actor. I lie for a living. However, it has been a while and maybe it is time,” he added.
Before exiting into infamy, which he’s now waking up to today, he left the crowd with some thoughts about what he was there for in the first place.

“Thank you so much for having me here. This is beautiful, chaotic, madness … I made the film because I wanted to try to bring to England a great poet that they missed. They missed him because he was written off as a jokester, a hoaxer. This guy is one of the deepest poets.”
Depp seems ti have gotten a little too into the part he was playing in his new movie, as a “jokester” and dark “hoaxer,” but nobody here in America is laughing, and certainly not the President of the United States. What will it take these celebrities to learn that talking about killing the president or speaking out against him in the most vicious manner they can muster, never ends well.

It was only a few short weeks ago that “jokester” Kathy Griffin pretended to behead Trump and endured an onslaught of backlash from that is still continuing today. She’s lost sponsors and big scheduled performances around the country, which is appropriate for her disturbing antics she was promoting to be “funny.” Depp has recently fallen into some financial difficulties and just sealed the fate of his future of not getting out of that with a few sick minutes of not being able to help himself at the podium.

Despite being one of Hollywood’s highest paid actors, Depp is in a financial depression that’s about to get a lot deeper for thinking he’s funny to joke about a non-joking matter. We’ve already seen that words are quickly turned into actions among unhinged liberals that are waiting to snap and encouragement like this from even just an actor gives these lunatics the ammunition they need. We saw this just last week with the would-be congressional killer who opened fire on several GOP congressmen and hoped to make it to Trump next.

And the Swamp is striking back. But this time right under the nose of President Donald Trump and his administration.

Special Counsel to the fake Russia probe created by the Democrat Party because they can’t believe they got their collective asses royally kicked by an outsider in the 2016 Presidential Election, Robert Mueller, added yet another Democrat hack to his growing team of Trump-Russia investigators.
The former FBI director recently recruited Democrat Elizabeth Prelogar, a lawyer who works for the Office of the Solicitor General. She is a far left liberal attorney who has argued five cases before the Supreme Court. She joins a group of at least 13 other former prosecutors and investigators on Mueller’s staff, most of which are Liberal Democrats and have shown it by their past litigations and political donations.

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich weighs in:

Former Republican Speaker Newt Gingrich is deeply concerned about Robert Mueller’s ability to lead a non-partisan, unbiased investigation, he said in an exclusive interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“The fix is in,” Gingrich told TheDCNF. “This is the establishment counter-attacking legally when they lost politically.”

Gingrich is specifically concerned about the fact that employees at Mueller’s ex-law firm, WilmerHale, gave $326,798 to Hillary Clinton in the run up to the 2016 presidential election, compared to the $628 that employees donated to Trump.

Robert Mueller, a distinguished attorney who served 12 years as FBI director under former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, was appointed to serve as special counsel for the Department of Justice in its investigation of any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump.

Since his May 17 appointment by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Mueller has put together a team of lawyers including former prosecutor and WilmerHale partner Jeannie Rhee and former DOJ attorney Andrew Weissmann.

“I love this in terms of transparency, [Rhee’s] job was to defend the Clinton Foundation against Freedom of Information Acts,” Gingrich said. “I mean, you can’t make this stuff up.”

“Another one was repudiated by the Supreme Court, nine to zero in the Arthur Anderson case, where they said that said he had hidden evidence,” Gingrich asserted.

“The same guy did something similar in hiding evidence against Enron, and four people spent a year in jail who were innocent,” Gingrich said, likely referring to Weissmann.

Gingrich slammed Republicans for not doing enough. “Unfortunately, all too many Republicans are sleepwalking and pretending this is all OK,” he told TheDCNF. “And they don’t do any research. They don’t look at, what’s the background to what’s going on here? This is not a fair game. These are people who are out to destroy Trump.”

Gingrich said that when he began digging deeper into Robert Mueller, he discovered some worrisome facts. “You couldn’t make this up if you were doing this for a novel,” Gingrich asserted.

“The left is desperate to find a way to defeat Trump,” Gingrich said. “And, they’re desperate– they cannot believe Trump beat them. Therefore, the Russians must have done it.”

Gingrich also asserted that at the Justice Department, among those who were politically active, 97 percent of the donations went to Clinton, compared to Trump’s 3 percent.

“So, when you say to me, ‘Do I worry about Mueller as an investigator?’ I think, well, do I worry about a department that’s 97 to 3 [percent], that would pick somebody who’s from a law firm which is 99.81 [percent]? Uh, as a historian, yeah, I’d worry,” Gingrich concluded. “And then you look at who he hired and it gets worse.”

Gingrich spoke to TheDCNF’s Ginni Thomas as part of her Saturday night “Leaders” series.

This Democrat Hack was also a former law clerk for extreme liberal Supreme Court justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan and Federal Election Commission records show she has donated to both Hillary Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns. On September 26, 2016, she gave $250 to the Crooked Hillary Clinton campaign and on October 3, 2012, she gave the same amount to the Barack Hussein Obama campaign. She then proceeded to give another $250 to the Obama Victory Fund. Lets put aside the fact that she is a sleazy attorney as most attorneys are, does this person sound like she would be impartial to you?

We can add the attorney hack Prelogar hiring to the long list Mueller has hired of huge Democrat donors such as James L Quarles III, Andrew Weissmann, and Jeanine Rhee, who actively worked for the Clinton “Crimes” Foundation.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Congress is considering new legislation that would permit lawmakers to carry a concealed firearm wherever they perform official duties across the United States, according to a copy of the new bill that marks an unprecedented effort to help lawmakers confront a growing threat to their safety.

Rep. Brian Babin (R., Texas) introduced the legislation on Tuesday, about a week after a radicalized shooter opposed to President Donald Trump and Republicans shot Rep. Steve Scalise (R., La.), a congressional staffer, a lobbyist, and two Capitol police officers in Virginia.

The legislation would enable certified members of Congress to carry a concealed weapon “in nearly every conceivable scenario,” according to information released by Babin’s office.

The legislation would supersede any other state or federal concealed carry laws, meaning that lawmakers would still enjoy the privilege even if secondary laws state otherwise. This is particularly significant, as the District of Columbia has notoriously strict gun laws that have complicated similar efforts in the past.

Members of Congress would be able to carry a concealed firearm in “federal parks and buildings, the national mall, to and from their offices, at schools and military bases” with just “a few limited restrictions,” according to Babin’s office.
“The tragic events of last week make it clearer than ever that we need to take steps to enable Members of Congress to protect themselves,” Babin said in a statement. “We also know that an even greater tragedy was averted only because of the brave actions by two armed Capitol Police special agents who happened, mercifully, to be on site.”

Babin maintains the bill “would ensure rank and file Members of Congress have the opportunity to defend themselves by providing them the ability to concealed carry in nearly every scenario with only a few restrictions.”

It is a direct response to the increased threat posed to federal lawmakers.

“With the increase in security threats to Members of Congress and our staffs, this is an important and necessary step that we must take,” Babin said.

Lawmakers would be granted the ability to qualify for a concealed carry permit, through home-state training or through the Capitol Police, according to the bill.

The U.S. Capitol Police also would be granted the discretion to determine proper training, licensing, and the parameters of use.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Today has been a crazy day, and it just got a Hell of a lot crazier. Remember how President Trump announced that he does NOT have any tapes of James Comey? Well, it does not end there.

Look who Daily Mail just spotted walking into the New York Times office in Manhattan, dark sunglasses and all…

It was disgraced FBI Director James Comey and his wife Patrice.
This cannot be good. The last time Comey showed up at the New York Times office, we ended up with a public hearing and the appointment of Comey’s BFF, Mueller, as the Special Investigator of Russian election fraud.

According to the Daily Mail, who managed to find this story in a show of excellent journalism, both Comey and his wife attempted to stay “low-profile” while onlookers were STUNNED.

So, we can assume Comey showed up at the Times for 1 of 2 reasons:

He is about to leak even more stuff

He wants the material that he leaked back before he gets in trouble for taking FBI property

Regardless, when Comey is involved, you know everyone is gonna suffer. Oh well, I’m sure Trump can handle it.

Help get this news out everywhere and tell James Comey to “Go Away!”