Barack Obama had a goal in mind when he pushed and bribed states to implement the new curriculum called Common Core. That goal was to push Islam onto our children and begin the indoctrination of our entire country. Many parents stood against this curriculum years ago and fought but not enough of us were aware nor did many want to even hear about it. As one of those parents myself, this attack on our educational system is what led me to homeschool my own children. After the push of this dangerous curriculum then it was onto the mass infiltration of migrant Muslim children to further push the schools to adopt policies that were NEVER needed before.

Well, now with President Trump in our corner, parents are now fighting back, and we are actually winning again.

Watch how one California family is dealing with the corrupt policies in his children’s school.

According to Red Nation Report:
A legal group and six parents have filed a lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of a San Diego Unified School District plan to protect Muslim students from bullying. “It’s our position that the anti-bullying policies should protect all students regardless of ethnicity and affiliation, and they shouldn’t be singling out any religious group for special treatment, as they seem to be doing here,” said Charles LiMandri, president and chief council for the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which filed the lawsuit in federal court Tuesday on behalf of the parents.
In April, trustees in the districts voted to create a policy that would protect Muslim students from bullying by, among other steps, increasing lessons about Islam. Students already learn about Islam and other religions as part of a social studies curriculum set by the state, but additional lessons could be added to create a better understanding of the religion, district staff members explained.

LiMandri and others who have objected to the policy said they are concerned the lessons could cross the line separating church and state. The anti-bullying policy is part of a larger effort the district has adopted to make campuses safe for all students. Anti-bullying policies also have been created for LGBT students and students who are Native American and Latino. The latest anti-bullying step was the first to focus on a religion and was sparked by a 2015 Council for American-Islamic Relations Report that found 55 percent of American Muslim students surveyed in California had said they were bullied because of their religion.

The district didn’t have data about how many of those incidents happened in its schools, but a report to the board in April did note that there were seven incidents of bullying between July 1 to Dec. 31, 2016, although it didn’t specify which religion was targeted. “That’s a relatively small number and it does not warrant or justify a wholesale change in the school district or its curriculum,” LiMandri said. “It appears to us that this is a politically correct type of solution looking for a problem,” he continued. “If Muslim students are being bullied, stop the bullying. But you don’t need to implement a program that is favoring Muslim students or one religion over another.”

The latest studies show that it is a FACT that when a city implements and applies the proper immigration laws that crime rates do in fact drop. That is not a racist statistic, nor a false one. Phoenix, Arizona has seen quite a drop in crimes since walking away from the Sanctuary city status and have no choice but to admit that it is due to the fact that most illegal immigrants are illegals because of criminal lifestyles and when they no longer have sanctuary they tend to stop committing so many crimes in order to stay off of the radar.

According to Fox:

At the center of national debate, a question remains unanswered: Are sanctuary cities that protect illegal immigrants safer than non-sanctuary cities? Sanctuary supporters claim they are. “Police chiefs across the nation believe that enlisting local police to enforce immigration law is a bad idea,” California Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De Leon, a Democrat, claimed at a news conference last week. “Having [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] pluck criminals out of jail and send them across the border or wherever they came from only to come right back endangers our communities.” But is that true?

And at least one city, Phoenix, saw a drop in crime after it eliminated its sanctuary city status, according to former law enforcement officials. Yet, some 200 cities nationwide adopted sanctuary policies and lawmakers propose to make California a sanctuary state. While the statute is opposed by the statewide county sheriff’s association, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck supports the bill that would prohibit local police from cooperating with ICE requests for information on illegal immigrants in custody.

“We do not want to dilute trust because trust is the most important thing in policing,” said Chief Beck. “We depend on our communities, particularly our immigrant communities to cooperate with us, not only to keep them safe but to keep all of you safe.” Beck and De Leon were joined by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. They oppose two bills passed Thursday by the House. One measure – named Kate’s law after a young woman who was killed by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times – stiffens punishment for people who re-enter the US illegally. The other strips some federal dollars from “sanctuary” cities that refuse to cooperate with ICE.

Kate’s law is named after Kathryn Steinle, right, who was allegedly killed by Francisco Sanchez, left, who was deported five times. (AP) In the eyes of Levi Bolton, executive director to the Arizona Police Association, that would be a mistake. In May 2008, Phoenix reversed itself, becoming a non-sanctuary state. Under the policy, police had full discretion to ask suspects about their immigration status and had the freedom to call ICE.
Take that California! I predict that now that funding will be drastically cut too many of these so-called sanctuary cities that they will start allowing their police to cooperate with ICE agents in rounding up these criminals and getting them out of our country and upon doing so they will all see a dramatic drop in crimes across the board. More Winning!

President Trump posted a short video to his Twitter account on Sunday in which he is portrayed wrestling and punching a figure whose head has been replaced by the logo for CNN.

The video, about 28 seconds long, appears to be an edited clip from a years-old appearance by Mr. Trump in WrestleMania, an annual professional wrestling event. The clip ends with an onscreen restyling of the CNN logo as “FNN: Fraud News Network.”

Oh California. A state so messed up that they provide nearly free education to illegal immigrants rather than American Citizens in their state Universities, a state so over run with debt, companies’ can’t leave fast enough because of the taxes and regulations, and where an illegal immigrant knows they can go to mooch of the state, collect all sorts of goodies, and roam about with the knowledge that the state of California will protect them from breaking the law, i.e. sanctuary cities.

However, all of that is soon coming to an end. The House of Representatives just passed the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act. This means that California will have two choices. One, cooperate with the Federal Government and eliminate sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants, and help the feds deport these criminals. Two, choose not to follow the law and you receive no more Federal grants from Uncle Sam. For cash strapped state like California, the loss of these Federal grants would be the nail in the coffin for them financially. I suppose California officials have a third choice, raise taxes again, but I think the citizenry might have an issue with that, and they may simply just leave the state. Why anyone would want to live there or have a business there is beyond me.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary hit the nail on the head when he stated, “The word ‘sanctuary’ calls to mind someplace safe, but too often for families and victims affected by illegal immigrant crime, sanctuary cities are anything but safe”. The loony left in California does not care about protecting the citizenry. They want the illegal immigrants so they can use them time and again for their various schemes, including voter fraud. President Donald Trump is doing what he promised and putting America first, something California politicians have yet to pick up on. After The House of Representatives passed the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act, President Trump stated the following; “Innocent Americans are suffering unthinkable violence as a result of these cities’ reckless actions … the implementation of these policies will make our communities safer. Opposing these bills, and allowing dangerous criminals back into our communities, our schools, and the neighborhoods where our children play, puts all of us at risk.”

The best part about this law, and Kate’s Law, named after Kate Steinle, who was killed by an illegal immigrant in the sanctuary city of San Francisco, will not provide very much room for the loony liberal judges in California to circumvent the law. Sure the California Attorney General can challenge the law but what is his argument to the Supreme Court going to be? That California should get a special exception to break Federal law along with other sanctuary cities. I’m sure that sound legal argument will go over real well.

Getting into the specifics of these laws, as reported by Katrina Willis from The Daily Signal, “One bill, Kate’s Law “enhances the current maximum sentences for illegal reentry into the United States, serving as a strong deterrent for deported felons seeking to come back to the United States,” according to its sponsor, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va. It passed 257-167. The other bill, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, deems sanctuary jurisdictions, cities, and states that do not cooperate with immigration officials or enforce immigration laws, ineligible for certain types of federal funding. That passed 228-195”. I would even go one step further and put a provision in the No Sanctuary For Criminals Act or Kate’s Law, that any state official that does not comply with either law can face a jail sentence of up to 5 years and a fine of $250,000. Other than taking away Federal money, there needs to be some real consequences. You know those things that most Democrats think don’t apply to them in their world.