Lisa Durden, an avid Black Lives Matter supporter was fired from the Essex County College in Newark recently after appearing on Tucker Carlson and launching into an ignorant racist rant in what appears to be a completely psychotic meltdown. Durden was recorded via live television saying,

“Boo, hoo, hoo. You, white people, are angry because you couldn’t use your white privilege card.”

Durden then goes on to make absolutely no sense while spouting off lies that she calls facts. However, she proves that she is just a racist as the ones she rails against. The racist rhetoric that Black Lives Matter has created to try and win arguments that have no basis in reality, and that was just proven.

According to The Wrap:

Lisa Durden is not sorry for comments made on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” that ultimately got her fired from her job as an adjunct professor at Essex County College in Newark, New Jersey. She was speaking to Carlson about a Black Lives Matter Memorial Day event open only to black people.

“Boo, hoo, hoo,” she said. “You white people are angry because you couldn’t use your white privilege card.” Carlson fired back that she was “demented.”

Two days later, Durden was suspended, and then fired on Friday. However, the professor says that there was no mention of why she was being suspended in the letter from the college. In an appearance on News One with Roland Martin, she confirmed that she was unapologetic for her remarks. When asked if she was going to apologize, she said “No, I am not going to. I wasn’t there to play games, I was there to take a bite out of crime,” she said. “When a black woman is on television who is direct, who is aggressive, we’re ‘angry.’ Well, when Jeanine Perro on TV pointing and screaming and yelling, she’s ‘intelligent.’ Why can’t I come on there and be aggressive and talk in the same vein as any expert in the fields of pop culture, politics and social issues,” she continued. “So now when I do it, I’m not intelligent. When they do it, they’re amazing, they’re intelligence, they’re fantastic!”

It seems that CNN is on a fast train to self-destructing. Project Veritas is highly known for exposing fraud and has now set their sights on the mainstream media network. The media has been continuously publishing false and defaming stories even though they have been proven to be fake.

The video just released by the founder, James O’Keefe, shows a Project Veritas employee having a conversation with one of CNN’s producers, John Bonifield, who basically admits that the constant barrage of “Russian/Trump collusion’ stories are fake and only being run for “the ratings.” Basically, the havoc being wrought against this country is now due to the crappy allegations of conspiring with Russia is being committed by greedy wanna-be journalists and their puppet masters to continue their cash flow.

Our tax money is being spent on numerous special committees to ‘investigate’ NOTHING! Does that not chafe anyone else? At this point, the left surely has to be getting fed up with being shown time and time again that the mainstream media is a lie-machine on steroids right?

According to Young Cons:

Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe tweeted a bombshell video late Monday evening of CNN Producer John Bonifield conceding that the network intentionally dominates airtime with Russia coverage and is not concerned with journalistic ethics. Bonifield mentions CNN CEO Jeff Zucker, and says he intentionally directed coverage away from the climate accord and back to Russia.

In the video, Bonifield says CNN is constantly covering Russia “because ratings.” “[Russia collusion theory] could be bull shit, it’s mostly bull shit right now. Like, we don’t have any big giant proof.” He continues: “I just feel like they don’t really have it, but they want to keep digging. And so I think the President is probably right to say, like, look, you are witch hunting me, like, you have no smoking gun. You have no real proof.”
This is such an insanely huge bombshell. These are concessions coming from a producer who’s worked for CNN for roughly 15 years. The reporter asks him: “Then why is CNN constantly, like, Russia this, Russia that?”

Bonifield says: “Because it’s ratings.”

Unbelievable.
At some point, we have to stop the wheel of insanity that these type of things create in this country. The constant distractions and morally inept reporting are one of the biggest setbacks in America for ALL sides involved. Mainstream media is panicking due to sites like Political Mayhem and others that refuse to sit silently as they create false news and propaganda attacks on any front, and they know that their days on air are numbered so they ramp things up to try and stay relevant for ratings and money from their backers but the truth is they are fodder and will eventually have no choice but to shut down because too many now want to expose their every skeleton and are well on the path of doing so.

James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas has struck again: This time, a senior CNN producer was caught on camera by one of O’Keefe’s investigators admitting that the network’s relentless bashing of President Donald Trump with the Russia scandal lacks proof.

“Could be bullshit. I mean, it’s mostly bullshit right now,” the CNN producer, John Bonifield, said in a video O’Keefe’s Project Veritas released on Tuesday, when asked about his thoughts on the Russia investigation. “Like, we don’t have any giant proof. Then they say, well there’s still an investigation going on. And you’re like, yeah, I don’t know. If they were finding something we would know about it. The way these leaks happen, they would leak it.

They’d leak. If it was something really good, it would leak…. The leaks keep leaking and there’s so many great leaks, and it’s amazing. I just refuse to believe that if they had something really good like that that wouldn’t leak because we’ve been getting all these other leaks. So, I just feel like they don’t really have it but they want to keep digging. And so I think the president is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me. You have no smoking gun. You have no real proof.”
The video also shows Bonifield admitting that he has not seen evidence that Trump has committed any crimes.

“I haven’t seen any good evidence to show the president committed a crime,” Bonifield says in the video.

And even if Russia did try to influence the U.S. election, Bonifield is heard saying in the video, that is not really much of a scandal. He is seen arguing that Russian efforts to influence the election would be normal, and that the U.S. government does the same thing around the world all the time.

“Even if Russia was trying to swing an election, we try to swing their elections, our CIA is doing shit all the time, we’re out there trying to manipulate governments,” Bonifield says.

Bonifield is a supervising producer for CNN Health. According to his biography on CNN’s website, Bonifield works with the CNN Medical Unit and “primarily with CNN Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen.”

All eyes are on Robert Mueller as he conducts his special investigation into Russian “interference” in the 2016 election. Democrats would love for him to produce evidence discrediting Trump. And Mueller is looking more and more like a compromised Leftist agent.

Even the dimwits in Congress are starting to voice concerns. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), is calling for Congress to act as a watchdog for the Special Counsel (via FOX News) If Mueller’s going to look into the president, he has to be kept in line.

Chaffetz is the former chair of the House Oversight Committee (a position now held by Trey Gowdy). According to Chaffetz, Mueller’s assignment doesn’t give him unlimited authority. He has to act within limits and must be carefully scrutinized by Congress.

“Just because you are a Special Counsel doesn’t mean you go unimpeded. There needs to be someone looking over the shoulder of the special prosecutor as well.” That’s absolutely right, especially with THIS Special Counsel.

Robert Mueller is good friends with James Comey. There’s a strong suspicion that James Comey leaked documents to the media to provoke a Special Counsel; a Special Counsel he knew would be his best pal. This is all as an act of revenge against President Trump.

Then there’s also the fact that the people Mueller has appointed to his Special Counsel team are die-hard Hillary Clinton supporters. How can Trump be treated fairly when the investigating body hates his guts?

Chaffetz brings up these points, arguing that there should never have been a Special Counsel. After all, we all know the Trump-Russia claims are bogus. Why waste time and money on a huge ball of nothing?
Additionally, there’s the charge that Trump was involved in obstruction of justice. That’s what Comey would have us believe. But how can justice be obstructed when nothing illegal was done to investigate in the first place?

The entire fiasco is a witch hunt designed to tarnish President Trump’s reputation. Chaffetz acknowledges this, which is why he calls the special counsel unnecessary. Now that it’s underway, he says, Congress must stay on top of Mueller to be sure he isn’t using his new role to execute a personal vendetta against President Trump.

Chaffetz also says Congress would be more efficient at combating the Deep State if they could have an expedition of subpoenas. Right now these have to come from the Department of Justice itself. That makes it harder to subpoena members of the DoJ or other federal agencies. For instance, the Obama DoJ protected IRS officials involved in targeting conservative organizations.

Congress better keep a close eye on Mueller. The American people are behind President Trump. We won’t put up with any action taken against him by these disingenuous Deep State actors.

Loretta Lynch has been exposed for her crimes.

She is going to jail!
The speculations that had been around for weeks are true, the Senate Judiciary Committee announced that they will be opening an investigation against Former Attorney General, Loretta Lynch. According to our source Subject Politics, Judge Andrew Napolitano exposed her for a crime that can put her in jail for a long time.

This is going to happen if emails in the investigation contain conversations about furthering the interests of the Democratic National Committee with Debbie Wasserman Shultz, Former DNC Chairwoman, this would be considered a felony with a possible penalty of 5-10 years.
However, news regarding Loretta Lynch is not something new, especially after the meeting she had with Bill Clinton and now Former FBI Director James Comey said Hillary Clinton will not be charged. Loretta Lynch said she regrets this meeting.

“I wish I had seen around that corner and not had that discussion with the former president, as innocuous as it was, because it did give people concern,” Said Loretta Lynch in an interview with CNN Sunday. “It did make people wonder is it going to affect the investigation that’s going on, and that’s not something that was an unreasonable question for anyone to ask.”

According to Judge Napolitano, this is classified as a felony, which amounts to an obstruction of justice charge.

“It is alleged, this document has not seen the light of day yet, if it exists that there is one or several emails between Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Loretta Lynch concerning the behavior that Loretta Lynch will take to further the DNC interests while Mrs. Lynch was the Attorney General, that if it happened, would be misconduct in office.” He continued with “Depending on what they charge her with, it could be five to ten years, it’s very serious, it’s the equivalent of obstruction of justice.”

The truth is going to be revealed soon. And Loretta Lynch will pay for her crimes!

This is what his ex-girlfriend had to say about him.

Check it out!

Now that Barack Obama left office, there is a lot of new information coming on who he really is. We get a glimpse at his closest relationships thanks to a new biography. According to our source Angry Patriot, David J. Garrow’s Obama biography called “Rising Star” he interviews Sheila Miyoshi-Jager, ex-Obama girlfriend that “reveals that she broke up with the former President for his refusal to condemn black anti-Semitism“

With this new explosive thing that was revealed you may think people would be surprised, but trust me we are not because we know what kind of a man he is. Obama is a Muslim sympathizer who hates Isreal for challenging Islam in the Middle East.

Sheila revealed that her relationship with Obama worsened when he remained firm in his support of black Chicago mayoral aide Steve Cokely–a vocal antisemite. And these were not like the accusations the liberals make against the Republicans, he had some very direct assaults on Jews, the media was also critical of him.

Steve Cokely preached that the Jews wanted to take over the world and if that wasn’t enough, he made said that Jewish Doctors were injecting black patients so they get AIDS. Anyone would have tried to stay away from that kind of person. Sheila Jager then ended the relationship when she realized that Barack Obama has no intention of doing this.

Brend Jager, Sheila’s father grew up in the Netherlands during World War II, he witnessed the way the Jews were treated during this time. He grew up as a conservative, and new Obama was no good.

He also most recently sided with anti-Semites, Jeremiah Wright who was known for offensive talking aginst Jews. Was Barack Obama being real when he preached against racism? It is sad to see more Jews are Democrats when the Democratic party doesn’t care about them since they would have let Muslim terrorists attack the State of Israel. Thanks to President Trump who stopped it.

Three CNN employees were essentially forced to turn in their resignations due to writing and publishing a fake story claiming Russian collusion concerning President Trump. The surprise wasn’t the story itself because many of us have already discredited every story that CNN comes out against the President. The surprise came when CNN retracted the story, destroyed all links to it, and then had their well-known employees resign. It definitely seems that something is afoot.

CNN has always stood by its fake news stories so one must question what has caused such a drastic change from their usual lie-fest and cover-up? Is it possible that the mainstream propaganda machine is now trying to clean up its act, and if so do they really think it will matter? Americans have already had more than enough of networks like CNN, and I do not see that changing.

According to The Wrap:

Three CNN employees have handed in their resignations over a retracted story linking President Trump to Russia, the network announced Monday. The article was removed from CNN.com on Friday after the network decided it could no longer stand by its reporting.

“In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignation of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” a network spokesperson told TheWrap in a statement. On Thursday, CNN investigative reporter Thomas Frank published a story involving an investigation into a Russian investment fund with possible ties to several Trump associates. According to the network, an internal investigation found that “some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published.”

Citing a single unnamed source, the story reported that Congress was investigating a “Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials.” The story, which only appeared on the network’s site, was quickly disputed on Friday, as one Trump ally Anthony Scaramucci — who was mentioned in the story — pushed back on Frank’s reporting, insisting he “did nothing wrong.”
Haris, Lichtblau and Frank had solid reputations among their colleagues. Frank worked as reporter for USA Today and Newsday before joining CNN. Lichtblau is a former New York Times Pulitzer-Prize winning reporter. And Haris was a former executive editor of CNNMoney.

“On Friday, CNN retracted a story published by my team. As Executive Editor of that team, I have resigned,” Haris said in a statement. “I’ve been with CNN since 2001, and am sure about one thing: This is a news organization that prizes accuracy and fairness above all else. I am leaving, but will carry those principles wherever I go.”

Lawyers involved in a lawsuit against the DNC for rigging the 2016 presidential election claim that witnesses due testify against the Democratic party are being murdered.According to attorney Elizabeth Beck, the legal team representing plaintiffs suing the Democratic National Committee now fear for their lives in the wake of the murder of DNC whistleblower Seth Rich. Wnd.com reports: “We filed the motion because we do feel that not only us, but our staff and the plaintiffs, are deserving of a motion,” attorney Elizabeth Beck, who is litigating the case, told WND. “But our court system does not have the resources to do so.”

She continued: “The court, in denying our motion for protection, stated in its order that the federal Marshals Service doesn’t have enough resources to devote that amount of protection.”A trove of DNC emails made public by WikiLeaks throughout the 2016 presidential election revealed top DNC officials privately conspiring to undermine candidate Bernie Sanders’ campaign, ultimately resulting in Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz resigning from her post as DNC chairwoman in July 2016.Jared Beck and Elizabeth Lee Beck filed a class-action lawsuit against Wasserman-Schulz and the Democratic National Committee last summer, charging that the DNC committed “fraud” in favoring Clinton over Sanders during the Democratic Party primaries. The Becks are seeking damages for Democratic Party donors and voters. They’re demanding the party repay individuals and Sanders supporters who were duped by the party’s 2016 primary and alleging misappropriation of funds.
‘2 potential witnesses in my case … both died’On June 13, the Becks filed the motion for order of protection in the U.S. District Court in Florida. They asked Judge Zloch to provide court protection to the plaintiffs, their counsel and their families, as well as all of the witnesses in the DNC fraud lawsuit.In support of the motion, they cited the unusual deaths of Seth Rich, DNC lawsuit process server Shawn Lucas and and the late Miami federal prosecutor Beranton Whisenant. (It’s unclear what roles, if any at all, Rich or Whisenant have played in the DNC case.) Beck also cited threats and bizarre phone calls the plaintiffs and counsel say they’ve received.

Rich, 27, was a DNC voter expansion data director for two years and had accepted a position with Hillary Clinton’s campaign. He was murdered in Washington, D.C., on July 10, 2016, near his apartment in an affluent neighborhood. Rich was shot twice in the back, and his wallet, credit cards, watch and phone were left in his possession. The Metropolitan Police Department has described it as a “botched robbery.”Private investigators, however, have claimed there is evidence Rich was the source WikiLeaks used to obtain thousands of DNC emails released on the eve of the party’s presidential nominating convention last July. The emails, indicating the party was manipulating the primary race in favor of Clinton, led to Wasserman Schultz’s resignation.