Earn Monthly Online Income Here!: http://bit.ly/TimeFreedomLifestyle

► Read More/ Source/ Credit(FAIR USE):
https://ift.tt/2IMWu7S

► Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/screenhoopla

⭐ Please Donate & Support This Channel:
https://ift.tt/2DBYeOd

#ScreenHooplaNews

MUSIC SOURCE:
Cylinder Two by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://ift.tt/1bFo3O7)
Source: https://ift.tt/1qZTioL
Artist: https://ift.tt/wfgYUg

Website → http://ScreenHoopla.com
Like us → https://ift.tt/2Gvu5T0
Follow us → https://twitter.com/ScreenHoopla
Instagram → https://ift.tt/2tQqNHe
Youtube → https://youtube.com/ScreenHoopla
Pinterest → https://ift.tt/2Gv5z4j

President Trump has now signed the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill despite an earlier Twitter threat to veto the legislation due to the lack of border wall funding and a fix for DACA. Trump signed this behemoth of a bill although he claimed he was reluctant to do so, adding that he was forced to do so in order to secure the increased funding for the military buildup which has been much needed since former President Barack Obama and a Republican Congress practically ignored for six years.

The President made clear this is not right and was a very bad deal for our country because of all the pet projects Democrats added as a condition to voting for this bill in the Senate. Trump stipulated that he signed it because it’s very important for us to build up our military in a world climate such as what we are living in.

The spending bill does allocate a total sum of $1.6 billion for border measures, much of which is for repairs to already existing fencing which is largely outdated and of questionable efficiency. It explicitly rules out any new prototypes of the kind President Trump viewed this month in Southern California.

This bill got money for the military while the Democrats got the funding for social services, funding for Planned Parenthood, and a free for all for Democrat legislators pet projects in order to secure their own reelection and pocketbooks.

President Trump was criticized as not having enough art in this deal, mocking the title of his previous book “The Art of the Deal.”

Earn Monthly Online Income Here!: http://bit.ly/TimeFreedomLifestyle

► Read More/ Source/ Credit(FAIR USE):
https://ift.tt/2IO6CND

► Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/screenhoopla

⭐ Please Donate & Support This Channel:
http://ift.tt/2DBYeOd

#ScreenHooplaNews

MUSIC SOURCE:
Cylinder Two by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://ift.tt/1bFo3O7)
Source: https://ift.tt/1qZTioL
Artist: http://ift.tt/wfgYUg

Website → http://ScreenHoopla.com
Like us → http://ift.tt/2Gvu5T0
Follow us → https://twitter.com/ScreenHoopla
Instagram → http://ift.tt/2tQqNHe
Youtube → https://youtube.com/ScreenHoopla
Pinterest → http://ift.tt/2Gv5z4j

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says shadowy figures connected to Her Majesty are “using dirty tricks in order to rig elections.”

Cambridge Analytica’s parent company Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL Group) has deep ties to the British Conservative Party, the military establishment, the House of Lords, defence contractors and the Royal family.

According to Assange, this company has engaged in a number of dirty tricks in order to rig elections at home and abroad.

“We finally have the most concrete evidence yet of shadowy actors using dirty tricks in order to rig elections. But these characters aren’t operating from Moscow… Instead, they are British, Eton educated, … and have close ties to Her Majesty…”

Cambridge Analytica is a mere offshoot of Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL Group) – an organisation with its roots deeply embedded within the British political, military and royal establishment.

Indeed, as the Observer article which broke the scandal said “For all intents and purposes, SCL/Cambridge Analytica are one and the same.”

Like Cambridge Analytica, SCL group is behavioral research and strategic communication company.

In 2005, SCL went public with a glitzy exhibit at the DSEI conference, the UK’s largest showcase for military technology.

It’s ‘hard sell’ was a demonstration of how the UK government could use a sophisticated media campaign of mass deception to fool the British people into the thinking an accident at a chemical plant had occurred and threatened central London. Genuinely.

Board members include an array of Lords, Tory donors, ex-British army officers and defense contractors. This is scandal that cuts to the heart of the British establishment.

SCL Group says on its website that it provides “data, analytics and strategy to governments and military organizations worldwide.”

The organisation boasts that it has conducted “behavioral change programs” in over 60 countries and its clients have included the British Ministry of Defence, the US State Department and NATO.

A freedom of information request from August 2016, shows that the MOD has twice bought services from Strategic Communication Laboratories in recent years.

In 2010/11, the MOD paid £40,000 to SCL for the “provision of external training”. Meanwhile, in 2014/2015, it paid SCL £150,000 for the “procurement of target audience analysis”.

In addition, SCL also carries a secret clearance as a ‘list X’ contractor for the MOD. A List X site is a commercial site on British soil that is approved to hold UK government information marked as ‘confidential’ and above. Essentially, SCL got the green light to hold British government secrets on its premises.

Meanwhile, the US State Department has a contract for $500,000 with SLC. According to an official, this was to provide “research and analytical support in connection with our mission to counter terrorist propaganda and disinformation overseas.” This was not the only work that SCL has been contracted for with the US government, the source added.

In May 2015, SCL Defense, another subsidiary of the umbrella organisation, received $1 million (CAD) to support NATO operations in Eastern Europe targeting Russia.

The company delivered a three-month course in Riga which taught “advanced counter-propaganda techniques designed to help member states assess and counter Russia’s propaganda in Eastern Europe”.

The British military and royal establishment links to SCL are further highlighted through another director Rear Admiral John Tolhurst, a former assistant director of naval warfare in the Ministry of Defence and aide de camp to the Queen.

The Queen’s third cousin, Lord Ivar Mountbatten, was also sitting on SCL’s advisory board but it’s unclear if he still holds that role.

Instead, they are British, Eton educated, headquartered in the city of London and have close ties to Her Majesty’s government.