Democrats continue to use any method they can imagine to succeed in their attempt to ban guns. They hoped it would pass while Obama was still in office but to this point but fortunately for all Americans, this did not happen. Now Dems have received another blow in the form of California’s “high-capacity magazine ban”. A Federal judge decided the ban was unconstitutional, therefore reversing the decision made in the great liberal state of California.

According to Blue Lives Matter:

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez ruled on Thursday that California’s “high-capacity magazine ban” was likely not constitutional.

The judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law from taking effect to give him time to consider the lawsuits from 2nd Amendment organizations such as the National Rifle Association.

The ban, which was signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown last year, requires that citizens surrender their “high capacity” magazines which hold more than 10 rounds. California’s previously enacted gun bill only prohibited the sale or import of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, but possession was legal.

The law also requires background checks on all ammunition purchases.

While the old fashion types with their 1911s might be safe, most modern full-size pistols hold more than 10 rounds. Banning their magazines effectively turns the guns into paperweights, or requires manufacturers to create special small-capacity magazines or modification kits for California.

“If this injunction does not issue, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of otherwise law-abiding citizens will have an untenable choice: become an outlaw or dispossess one’s self of lawfully acquired property,” San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez wrote, according to Sacramento Bee.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra argued that in the case of mass shootings, changing magazines would force the shooter to waste time changing magazines, giving people chance to run.

While it may take somebody unfamiliar with firearms a long time to reload, our partners at Warrior 12 show us that a trained gunfighter isn’t slowed down very much.

Becerra also argued that nobody was being forced to surrender their property because they were given time to sell it to people out-of-state. The whole “you don’t need to surrender your property, you just need to get rid of it,” excuse wasn’t working in Judge Roger Benitez’s courtroom.

Let’s call this high-capacity magazine ban what it is: A gun ban, which is intended to render many firearms inoperable and turn otherwise legal gun owners into criminals.

After months of legal battles, Trump’s travel ban officially began after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Trump. Naturally millions of Americans are up in arms over the ban claiming it is strictly a ban on Muslims, that was never the case and it still isn’t. The ban primarily impacts Muslims due to the fact that the countries on the list are a Muslim majority, but anyone attempting to travel from those countries whether they be Christians or have any ties to other religious affiliation are out of luck as well. Of course, that doesn’t stop Muslims in America from attempting to spread lies about the ban, but in the end, it doesn’t matter. Trump is fed up with the numerous attacks taking place around the world and is doing everything in his power to protect the American people plain and simple.

The left is desperate to stop Trump but continue to hit a brick wall in their attempts. They are used to soft Republicans who bow to the pressures of the Democrats at any sign of discomfort. Those days are officially over thanks to Trump and a Supreme Court who actually follows the constitution instead of spits on it. The future is bright indeed thanks to Trump and his team.

It’s funny to see Democrats change their tunes the way they do because as I recall during the past 8 brutal years they praised Obama for any and all executive action taken regardless of whether it was constitutional or not. Now that Trump is President, they are resisting anything our POTUS attempts to do. The truth is, the Democrats need immigrants and Muslims in order to stay in power and every move Trump makes ensures they will never have those illegal votes again. This just cannot happen for them. Democrats are at a loss now because Trump’s travel ban cannot be challenged any longer. It has already passed the highest court in the land and all they can do is squirm.

Fox News reports:

Trump’s tweets dominate White House press briefing

With President Donald Trump’s travel ban set to go into effect Thursday evening, there’s still some confusion about who exactly is barred from coming to the U.S.
The Supreme Court on Monday partially restored Trump’s executive order — widely seen as a Muslim ban — and the administration set new criteria on Wednesday for visa applicants and refugees.

The new restrictions, which were sent to U.S. consulates and embassies Wednesday night, will go into effect at 8 p.m. ET Thursday.

People from six Muslim-majority nations from entering the country. Those countries are:Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

New guidelines stipulate that visa applicants from those six nations must be able to prove a “bona fide relationship” in the U.S. If an applicant cannot prove that relationship, then they will be barred from the U.S. for 90 days.

The only exception to this court-enforced travel ban applies to those who had already secured visas and will be allowed to into the U.S. “Those entering the U.S. for business purposes, students and journalists might also be allowed so long as that they have the proper documentation, a State Department official told Fox News.”

The revised travel ban, previously and erroneously referred to as a “Muslim ban” by liberals, cannot be challenged since it’s legally enforceable — effectively tying the hands of Muslim sympathizers who would stop at nothing to let the potential terrorists into America. It puts a 90-day travel ban on people coming from Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. Although the prior order prevented travel from Iraq, this one does not, as well as it not longer gives Christians priority since that was something that Trump had to concede to in order to make this order unchallengeable.

Still in effect with this travel ban is Trump’s suspension of the entire refugee program for the next 120 days, preventing 50,000 refugees from entering any time in the next four months, according to Jezebel. This gives time to ensure the vetting process of refugees is thorough enough to ensure the safety of all American citizens whether they know it or not. There is one catch however, any refugees accepted into the program prior to June 6 will be allowed to continue on with resettlement.

“Like every nation, the United States has a right to control who enters our country and to keep out those who would do us harm,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said, according to Fox News.

Fed-up Americans clashed with so-called “migrant parents” at a school board meeting over the teaching of Islam in public schools. The Muslim parents seemed to have been bused in by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as actors to back the liberal school board’s pro-Islamic agenda. The American parents are fighting back, and you’ll love the nasty surprise they just delivered to the school board and CAIR.

The San Diego School Board is calling their new curriculum a “sensitivity program” meant to combat the bogus claims of bullying of Muslims in the school district. The problem is, it’s all based on CAIR’s 2015 report saying 55 percent of Muslim students surveyed in California said they were bullied.

“The district didn’t have data about how many of those incidents happened in its schools, but a report to the board in April did note that there were seven incidents of bullying between July 1 to Dec. 31, 2016, although it didn’t specify which religion was targeted,” reported San Diego Tribune.

CAIR has been designated as a known terrorist organization by UAE after the group aligned with Hamas, and they are the propaganda wing for these radical Muslim activists. The idiots on the San Diego School Board are your run of the mill bleeding heart liberal nutjobs who have no idea they are being manipulated. That bogus report talks about seven incidents of bullying in the whole state of California, and it does not know if any religion was tied to those incidents.

After the school board had several meetings where only parents who are against the Muslim program showed up to speak out, all of a sudden, CAIR drops off five women dressed in hijabs for the meeting on May 17th. There was no way to confirm if any of these women even have kids in the San Diego School District.
Six American parents, sick and tired of getting the runaround, filed a lawsuit. “It’s our position that the anti-bullying policies should protect all students regardless of ethnicity and affiliation, and they shouldn’t be singling out any religious group for special treatment, as they seem to be doing here,” said Charles LiMandri, President and Chief Counsel for the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which filed the lawsuit in federal court Tuesday on behalf of the parents.

Now, Mr. LiMandri and the parents have just amended the lawsuit to include CAIR, pointing out that the bogus anti-bullying indoctrination program came about because of CAIR. “The updated filing adds focus on CAIR’s Hamas ties and its status as a religious organization, in addition to shining a greater spotlight on how the scheme violates California law,” reported the Investigative Project on Terrorism.
“It appears to us that this is a politically correct type of solution looking for a problem,” said Charles LiMandri. “If Muslim students are being bullied, stop the bullying. But you don’t need to implement a program that is favoring Muslim students or one religion over another.”

One parent, Charles Wyrick has been on fire at the school board meetings, as Mad World News previously reported. He said, “I’m a husband, a father, and a proud American. I’ve been given many titles in my life, but the one I’ll never accept is the one of infidel.” The board then tried to silence his comments, to which he replied, “You’re going to have to drag me out of here!” That’s exactly how patriotic Americans feel about this “Islamophobia” and Islamo-sympathizer bullcrap. After watching terror attacks around the world, we rightly know our way of life, our culture, and everything we hold dear is under siege, and those sympathizing with Islam are enabling evil.

President Trump is left with little choice on how to respond to this evil force; a force that is growing in power every day.

President Trump has ordered his military advisors to develop invasion plans that are to be deployed if North Korea makes significant progress towards developing a missile that could strike the continental United States (via CNN).

The military options have been prepared and are ready to be presented to President Trump, who was meeting with the newly elected South Korean president yesterday.

Top advisors have described the military situation in Korea as a “hostage” situation. North Korea has a stockpile of missiles aimed at South Korea and Japan.

Any direct military assaults would leave both South Korea and Japan vulnerable to devastation. The American military has been preparing for this threat.

American forces have recently installed the THAAD anti-ballistic missile defense system in South Korea, and our two countries are currently discussing clandestine operations from within to topple the North Korean dictatorship.

President Trump has been relying on the Chinese government to pressure their allies in North Korea to stop testing nuclear missiles, but the efforts have so far remained futile.
National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster says that if North Korea continues to advance their missile technology, America will have no choice but to intervene and prevent a nuclear powered communist dictatorship.

“What we have to do is prepare all options because the President has made clear to us that he will not accept a nuclear power in North Korea and a threat that can target the United States and target the American population,” explained McMaster. “The threat is much more immediate now. We can’t repeat the same failed approach of the past.”

North Korea has tested at least 16 long and short range ballistic missiles since President Trump assumed office. Top officials claim that the North Korean threat is one of President Trump’s top priorities. Trump has previously stated that the North Korean regime is the greatest threat to American security.

However, due to past continued inaction from previous administrations, President Trump is forced to grapple with a North Korea on the verge of nuclear capability.

Out of the mouths of children sometimes spill the most bold and naked truths.

Our school systems have worked tirelessly to correct that problem, but it seems that kids just don’t always read the PC memos.

One such child, Mason, a young Conservative-in-the-making, had one such moment where a Hillary-supporting teacher saw his anti-Clinton T-shirt and asked him a pointed question.

The boy’s reply is lighting up social media right now, and for good reason.

“The Benghazi fiasco and subsequent lie trail that Hillary Clinton has left in her wake is something I’m sure she wishes would just go away.

Luckily, we have patriots all across this great nation that will make sure that never happens.

A young man by the name of Mason wore his ‘Hillary for Prison 2016’ shirt to high school one day, which caught the attention of one of his liberal teachers.

According to his father’s proud Facebook post, it’s a pro-Hillary teacher whom Mason regularly talks politics with.
But during this particular exchange, the teacher got an unexpected, yet, totally epic response. His father sets the scene:

So…Mason wore his ‘Hillary for Prison 2016’ shirt to school today. One of his Clinton-supporting teachers whom he’s has political discussions with asked, ‘Did you wear that for me?’

His reply, ‘No, for Chris Stevens.’”

Christopher Stevens, of course, was the U.S. Ambassador to Libya that perished in Benghazi on Hillary Clinton’s watch.

This story originated from a Facebook post, but it’s since been taken down. We imagine that Mason and his family didn’t want the publicity, but to be honest, they SHOULD.”

All I can say is this kid is destined for great things. That answer would put to shame any modern Democrat in either the House or the Senate.

Conservatives have fought tooth and nail to help President Trump implement better immigration laws and enforcement of said laws for well over a year and many great strides have been successful as proven by the Supreme courts upholding of the Travel Ban recently. However, we have serious adversaries in the form of sanctuary cities. A few states across the country are currently holding out under the title of sanctuary but the main-based advocates of this is in California. One such city just did the most disgusting thing ever in the name of saving illegals.

According to Conservative Daily Post :

In San Francisco, taxpayers are going to pay nearly $200,000 to an illegal immigrant because he was reported to immigration officials. According to the lawsuit, being reported was a violation of the cities sanctuary city ordinance. According To A Lawsuit In San Francisco, Reporting An Illegal Is A Violation Of The City’s Sanctuary Policy. So, not only are illegals being protected from immigration officials, but they are being rewarded compensation if they are removed! Leave it to California to find a way to make the topic of illegal immigration even more infuriating than it already is. Pedro Figueroa-Zarceno, the illegal in question, had walked into a police station in early December of 2015 to recover a stolen car. An officer there knew he was an illegal citizen and directly called U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and spoke to them where they could find the illegal.

As Figueroa-Zarceno was leaving the station, ICE agents picked him up and took him into custody. He was detained for two months before being released for some unknown reason. However, the two-month detention is now being considered a violation of the Sanctuary city policies. San Francisco had originally approved a policy back in 1989. What it did was stop city officials from enforcing the immigration laws in most of the cases. Back then, it was an attempt to get most of the immigrant communities to trust the police, and cooperate with them if need be. A second ordinance was passed in 2013, called the Due Process for All. What it does is stop the San Francisco law enforcement from detaining illegals and preparing them for deportation, with the exception of if they are wanted for serious crimes. San Francisco’s Sanctuary Policies Stop Illegals From Being Deported.