Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Last week on the 16th of June, the USS Fitzgerald, a United States Navy vessel, part of the USS Ronald Reagan Strike Group, was involved in a collision with the ACX Crystal container ship off the coast of Japan. The crash resulted in the USS Fitzgerald suffering massive damage and the loss of seven sailors. The events taking place after the incident have left more questions than answers, with many people wondering how this could have happened? Was this an intentional terrorist attack, or simply an accident that happened due to a comedy of errors on both sides?

As reports and information were being revealed on social media, many were claiming, according to available maritime records, that the ACX Crystal executed a sharp turn 25 minutes before the collision. Large news outlets such as the BBC were referencing the below graph and other available records to substantiate this claim.
However, the crew of the ACX Crystal is claiming the turn in question took place after the collision and not before. Some have suggested this turn could be the result of the ship being on autopilot, but frankly, I’m not buying this story.

“There is a discrepancy in the timeline, reported UK Daily Mail, with the company insisting the collision happened earlier than the Navy said it did. That’s critical because tracking sites show a sharp turn, but the earlier time frame would mean the ACX Crystal turned after the collision to see what happened, not before it. UK Daily Mail quoted one expert who said the ship may have been operating on autopilot” (McBride, 2017, para. 18).

Though maritime rules state vessels are required to yield to other vessels that are on their starboard (Right Side), possibly placing blame on the crew of the USS Fitzgerald (this is where the USS Fitzgerald sustained the damage), this does not explain the sudden turn executed by the ACX Crystal, and why her crew did not attempt to reverse or change course prior to the collision. Both ships of this caliber are equipped with technology and warning systems to prevent incidents like this from happening, and it wasn’t as if the ships were in close proximity to each other until the time of the collision. Furthermore, both ships should have had sufficient crew on duty to monitor their ships respective course, even if they were both on autopilot.

Taking a look at both ships the ACX Crystal outweighs the USS Fitzgerald by 20,000 tons. Surely, if the crew of the USS Fitzgerald knew the ACX Crystal was approaching, and they likely did, I’m sure they tried to get out of the way, send a message to warn the ACX Crystal, and took other evasive and defensive maneuvers.
All of these questions and the events afterward are leaving some to speculate this was an intentional terrorist attack, and the US Navy and others are being tight-lipped about the investigation. It is certain the crew of the USS Fitzgerald had the crew on duty on the bridge, so they must have known another ship was approaching them, and surely they would have tried to turn out of the way or warn the ACX Crystal. This being the case, either someone dropped the ball or the actual events which took place prior to and after the collision are purposely being distorted.

What is known about the ACX Crystal is, it is chartered by the Japanese shipping company Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK), owned by Dainichi-Invest Corporation, and registered in the Philippines. Little else is known at this time about the crew or the Captain of the ACX Crystal.

Given current tensions with North Korea, Iran, and ISIS, it’s possible this was an intentional terrorist attack, and in actuality the crew of the USS Fitzgerald were aware of the ACX Crystal approaching, and tried to get out of the way, explaining why the USS Fitzgerald sustained damage on the starboard side. I have every confidence that the crew of the USS Fitzgerald is highly competent and attempted to avoid a collision. At best, this incident was the result of an incompetent crew of the ACX Crystal, and those responsible should be held accountable. Whatever the motive or reason was, Americans need to be vigilant in making sure the truth is revealed.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
The walls are closing in on the Democrat Party faster than the trash compactor closed in on Luke Skywalker and the gang on that harrowing escape from the Death Star. Remember last year when the DNC files were hacked and they refused to allow the FBI to investigate the hacks in order to save themselves from being exposed for the criminals they are? Well, it appears their crimes are catching up with them because the House Intelligence Committee has ordered John Podesta to appear in front of them for a special hearing. Podesta has no place to hide now and will finally be exposed for the bastard he is. They are finished!

John Podesta has just been ordered to appear before the House Intelligence Committee for an interview. This means he’s going to be put under oath and at the mercy of the Committee’s questions! (via The Washington Examiner)

One of the first questions I imagine the House Intelligence Committee is going to have for him is why he didn’t allow the FBI to investigate the DNC hacking.

There is just no good answer that doesn’t implicate him in a crime. And, because Podesta’s personal emails were leaked by Wikileaks the House Intelligence Committee could delve into that closet too.

They could ask him about Seth Rich. They could ask him what he meant by “making an example” of someone. They could grill him on what he knew about Clinton’s warmongering in Yemen.

Any answer to any of these questions is also going to implicate Hillary Clinton in their crimes. John Podesta has been so close to Hillary Clinton for so long.

I’m honestly surprised that the Clinton machine hasn’t labeled Podesta as a liability yet. Although, I suppose there is still time for a horrible accident to befall him before he testifies.

At first, I was a little troubled that the House decided this meeting with Podesta would occur in private. We all want to see him taken down publicly.

But, this may be a powerful strategic move, perhaps even being suggested by Trump himself. If the interview is private, I think Podesta is a lot more likely to make it in front of the committee alive.

Second, because the whole world knows Podesta had his hands on classified information, he could have used that as an excuse to avoid the committee’s questioning.

But, because the interview will be private, any excuse about a subject or document being classified will ring false. What information could he know that the committee members won’t?

This is the first step to bringing the Clinton’s and all of their cronies down. Did Hillary really think she could get away with murder forever? Everything catches back up with us over time and Hillary hoped she could win the Presidency and avoid all of this by sweeping it under the rug. She figured there would be no way Trump would win and expose her, but fortunately for us, she was dead wrong.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Like all good ole Socialist dinosaurs, the violent instigator Bernie Sanders tried to dismiss accusations that his wife, Jane Sanders, had committed fraud by obtaining bank loans for the now defunct Burlington College under false pretenses.

And to make matters even worse on hers, Bernie Sander’s Senate office stepped in to help her. In a prepared statement they called the accusations “nonsense,” and actually blamed the whole mess on President Donald Trump’s campaign manager in Vermont. Really Bernie? President Donald Trump made your wife defraud a bank and scam a college?
Although the current investigation started more than a year ago when President Barack Hussein Obama was still in office and his Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who is now under investigation for corruption herself, was the United States Attorney. He still blames President Trump. Let’s hope he doesn’t call on violence against Republicans as he has done multiple times before because his wife is a fraudster.

Jane Sanders was the president of small Burlington College in Burlington, Vermont for seven years. from 2004 until 2011. During her time there Sanders masterminded an ambitious expansion plan that would have more than doubled the size of the school.

The Daily Caller Reports:

Jane Sanders, the wife of former Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), has hired two high-powered lawyers with Washington, D.C., connections to defend them as the FBI investigates whether Jane Sanders falsified loan documents while she served as the president of Burlington College.
Sanders has hired Rich Cassidy, a well-connected attorney from Burlington, Vt., as well as Larry Robbins, the Washington-based attorney who defended I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, to defend herself and her husband in the matter, former campaign manager Jeff Weaver told Politico.

“It would be negligent for anyone involved in the matter to not retain counsel,” Weaver told Politico.

In May, it was reported that Sanders claimed Burlington College could count on $2.6 million in donations to pay for purchased land, according to a 2010 loan application. But she ultimately raised only a fourth of that, making $676,000 in donations over the next four years, forcing the college into bankruptcy in May 2016.

Sanders was accused of falsifying the information on the loan documents in order to expand the college grounds by Brady Toensing, President Trump’s campaign manager in the state of Vermont, according to Politico’s report. Toensing sent multiple letters to the FBI and federal officials in 2016 urging an investigation into Sanders’s management of the college’s finances.
“As a result of my [initial] complaint,” Toensing wrote to federal officials, “I was recently approached and informed that Senator Bernard Sanders’s office improperly pressured People’s United Bank to approve the loan application submitted by the Senator’s wife, Ms. Sanders.”

According to the report, the amount that donors agreed to pledge compared to what Sanders documented is different.

Weaver dismissed claims that Bernie Sanders or his office intervened in the loan request, calling it “ridiculous” and “false” in a statement to Politico.

The FBI has not filed formal charges, and Weaver told The Daily Caller in May that the agency had not yet contacted Sanders.
In order to do this, this Marxist POS fraudster coerced the college into taking a $10 million loan to finance the purchase of a new more luxurious and modern campus in order to attract more students. This stupid move lead to Sander’s being fired from the college and the total collapse of the school its self. Keep in mind this was a school which was struggling just to stay open so it would be able to keep it’s 300 or so students.

Of course, since she is a “Socialist” she probably meant well, right? Wrong, she lied in the bank documents by purposely overstating the pledged donations and tax-exempt bonds the college actually had secured, by a number of over 6.5 million dollars.

And this is who 45% of the DemoCRAP Party wanted as their “First Lady?” Are you kidding me? These far left Democrats will fall for anyone who looks like a freak who hasn’t bathed in decades. Seeing as to how the first response from these people was to blame President Trump I have this distinct feeling that if Crooked Hillary Clinton would have won the presidency in 2016, no one would have ever known about this and it would have all “Gone Away.”