Hypocrisy from Mika Brzezinksi shouldn’t be a shock at this point, but White House counselor Kellyanne Conway had no problem calling out the “Morning Joe” host on her backwards reporting.
Not only did Conway blast CNN’s anti-Trump office culture, but specifically pointed to Brzezinski’s ridiculous claims of sexism from President Trump. Conway immediately referenced Brzezinksi’s attacks on women in President Trump’s White House, as well as vicious barbs aimed at Conway specifically.

“When Mika said what she has said about me, I have not responded. All those things she’s said about me — ‘politics porn,’ ‘liar,’ ‘nothing honest about Kellyanne Conway’ — I haven’t responded to that, I haven’t shown the texts, I’ve sort of just sucked it up, swallowed it, dealt with the crying kids about it. This whole idea that she’s some victim of sexism is really rich just for any woman who works here,” Kellyanne continued.

Democrats continue to use any method they can imagine to succeed in their attempt to ban guns. They hoped it would pass while Obama was still in office but to this point but fortunately for all Americans, this did not happen. Now Dems have received another blow in the form of California’s “high-capacity magazine ban”. A Federal judge decided the ban was unconstitutional, therefore reversing the decision made in the great liberal state of California.

According to Blue Lives Matter:

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez ruled on Thursday that California’s “high-capacity magazine ban” was likely not constitutional.

The judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law from taking effect to give him time to consider the lawsuits from 2nd Amendment organizations such as the National Rifle Association.

The ban, which was signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown last year, requires that citizens surrender their “high capacity” magazines which hold more than 10 rounds. California’s previously enacted gun bill only prohibited the sale or import of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, but possession was legal.

The law also requires background checks on all ammunition purchases.

While the old fashion types with their 1911s might be safe, most modern full-size pistols hold more than 10 rounds. Banning their magazines effectively turns the guns into paperweights, or requires manufacturers to create special small-capacity magazines or modification kits for California.

“If this injunction does not issue, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of otherwise law-abiding citizens will have an untenable choice: become an outlaw or dispossess one’s self of lawfully acquired property,” San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez wrote, according to Sacramento Bee.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra argued that in the case of mass shootings, changing magazines would force the shooter to waste time changing magazines, giving people chance to run.

While it may take somebody unfamiliar with firearms a long time to reload, our partners at Warrior 12 show us that a trained gunfighter isn’t slowed down very much.

Becerra also argued that nobody was being forced to surrender their property because they were given time to sell it to people out-of-state. The whole “you don’t need to surrender your property, you just need to get rid of it,” excuse wasn’t working in Judge Roger Benitez’s courtroom.

Let’s call this high-capacity magazine ban what it is: A gun ban, which is intended to render many firearms inoperable and turn otherwise legal gun owners into criminals.