Anti-blasphemy laws have been a massive victory for Muslims across the globe, as now these idiots can have people who speak out and criticize their religion thrown into prison. Courts are now turning their backs on their very own citizens in order to pander to the very group of people who want to kill them, as we continue to hear horrifying stories of citizens in Europe being rounded up and jailed for talking bad about Muslims.

Now in a disturbing report that the mainstream media is burying, Senator Marco Rubio has just been exposed for working with KNOWN TERRORISTS at the White House to get a bill passed that will criminalize Americans who speak out against Muslims and Islam, in a shocking move of treason towards the American people that will leave you speechless.
We had enough damage done to our country under the tyrannical rule of Barack Hussein Obama, who was nothing more than a domestic terrorist who worked tirelessly to further the mission of radical Muslims around the world while stabbing America in the back. Well now it appears as though Marco Rubio has just picked up the torch of treason, as he has just been exposed as the TRAITOR who spear-headed a bill with KNOWN TERRORISTS that will make speaking out against Muslims and Islam illegal. Rubio worked alongside the Muslim terror group EmgageUSA, whose members are currently on a terror watch list for their ties to Al Qaeda. Creeping Sharia reported:

On April 4, 2017, the US Senate passed Senate Resolution 118, “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States.” The resolution was drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA (formerly EmergeUSA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

Muslims across America were in full celebration mode commemorating the “hard work” of Senator Rubio, where EmgageUSA put out the following public statement:

“Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins and Senator Kamala Harris we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream.”

What’s chilling is that THIS BILL HAS PASSED THE SENATE and has now gone on to the House, where almost the exact same verbiage was introduced as H.Res. 257. If passed, this law will create an “inter-agency task force” that will then go after people who speak out against Muslims, who are a “protected class.” H.Res. 257 urges:

“…the development of an inter-agency task force led by the Attorney General and bringing together the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Education, the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to collaborate on the development of effective strategies and efforts to detect and deter hate crime in order to protect minority communities”. The House Resolution was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary on April 6 and from there it was referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations on April 21.

Why the hell is Marco Rubio working with Muslim terrorists to persecute Americans who speak out against Islam? EmgageUSA’s co-founder Khurrum Wahid is currently on a terror watch list for his extensive work with Al Qaeda, and as a lawyer, Wahid defended Omar Ahmed Abu Ali, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison for plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush!
Here’s more on Muslim terrorist Omar Ahmed Abu Ali, who Walhid worked to defend. NBC News reported back in 2006:

An American Muslim was sentenced Wednesday to 30 years in prison for joining al-Qaida and plotting to assassinate President Bush.
Prosecutors had asked for the maximum — a life sentence — for Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, a 25-year-old U.S. citizen who was born to a Jordanian father and raised in Falls Church, Va.

“The facts of this case are still astonishing,” prosecutor David Laufman said. “Barely a year after Sept. 11, the defendant joined the organization responsible for 3,000 deaths.”

Sarah Palin is suing The New York Times for defamation, according to documents filed in federal court Tuesday that were obtained by The Daily Caller.

The lawsuit has to do with an editorial the NYT ran on June 14 that falsely smeared Palin as inciting the 2011 shooting of Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords by a mentally ill man. There is no evidence to support the NYT’s implication that Palin played a role in inciting the Giffords shooting.

“Mrs. Palin brings this action to hold The Times accountable for defaming her by publishing a statement about her that it knew to be false: that Mrs. Palin was responsible for inciting a mass shooting at a political event in January 2011,” Palin’s suit states.

“Specifically, on June 14, 2017, The Times Editorial Board, which represents the ‘voice’ of The Times, falsely stated as a matter of fact to millions of people that Mrs. Palin incited Jared Loughner’s January 8, 2011, shooting rampage at a political event in Tucson, Arizona, during which he shot nineteen people, severely wounding United States Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, and killing six, including Chief U.S. District Court Judge John Roll and a nine-year-old girl.”

The lawsuit states that the paper “published and promoted its Editorial Board’s column despite knowing that the linchpin of its ‘sickening pattern’ of politically-incited shootings was the false assertion that Mrs. Palin incited Loughner to murder six people, among them a child and federal judge, and seriously wound numerous others.”

It goes on to state: “As the public backlash over The Times’ malicious column mounted, it responded by making edits and ‘corrections’ to its fabricated story, along with half-hearted Twitter apologies–none of which sufficiently corrected the falsehoods that the paper published. In fact, none mentioned Mrs. Palin or acknowledged that Mrs. Palin did not incite a deranged man to commit murder.”
Palin claims the editorial “exceeded the bounds of legality, decency and civility by publishing the false and defamatory column.”

The full lawsuit can be seen below.

Sarah Palin sues the New York Times for defamation by Peter Hasson on Scribd
In the NYT’s editorial, which has since been updated, the editors claimed there was a “clear” link to incitement between Jared Loughner’s attempted assassination of Giffords, and a map Palin had created that placed crosshairs over districts that Republicans needed to flip in the 2012 election. No such link exists.

CNN’s Jake Tapper pointed out in response to the NYT editorial that “even way back in Jan 2011 we knew that Loughlin’s obsession began 3 years before the Palin map.” Tapper made that same exact point back in 2011 when he worked for ABC.

After harsh criticism in the media, the NYT finally added a correction that read: “An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established.”

Michelle Obama may still be enjoying her ongoing post-presidential vacation, but that doesn’t mean this vindictive woman is ready to let go and just allow her replacement to shine in her new role. Perhaps she thought Melania Trump was an easy target when Michelle’s disgusting friends were sent to the State Dinner to do her dirty work, but their nasty plan didn’t exactly work as well as they had hoped. At some point, liberals need to stop underestimating the Trumps or face perpetual humiliation.

On top of being the picture of class, elegance, and compassion, nothing could burn Mrs. Obama more than Melania’s skyrocketing approval ratings. She’s won over the world with the way she carries herself, which is a refreshing sight for sore eyes use to seeing Michelle for eight years, who also seems to refuse to just go away. At the recent White House State Dinner, Melania was blindsided with a reminder that the Obamas are still sticking around and stalking them, even when they’re a world away in Indonesia. That still didn’t stop the classy couple from getting the perfect, effortless revenge.

Perhaps it’s Melania’s perfection that the left can’t stand since they have nothing else to criticize her for. However, the liberal media just found something to target her for and are probably wishing that they just stuck to their duties of their job rather than doing Michelle any favors in their reporting of this event.

The Mirror reports:

“Melania Trump’s style has come a long way since Donald’s election campaign and we’ve seen her sporting much more tailored looks. But her most recent outfit to meet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House, has been met with a bit of criticism.”

Melania wore a summery yellow gown that was not only fit for the season and reflective of her cheerful personality, but she looked stunning and appropriate it in. That opinion was apparently not shared among her detractors who thought it wasn’t the right ensemble for the occasion and criticized her appearance.

The main complaint seemed to be that her bold choice in pattern and color was better suited for a garden party rather than a formal event. However, the tailoring, neckline, and sleeve suggest otherwise and people who don’t dress nearly as classy as Melania are in no place to offer their two cents – especially when they have recently praised Michelle’s horrifically risque attire at an Italian cathedral that actually does have a very specific dress code.
While Michelle’s liberal media friends were quick to slam Melania for her dress, Melania handled it with class, making them regret their remarks by just being her incredibly elegant self. She didn’t have to do or say anything specifically since the comparison to the left’s “queen Michelle” was all too easy to make with pictures from her most recent vacation before this current one she’s on, which proved whose attire is really inappropriate.
It was only just a few short weeks ago that Michelle was spotted globe-trotting in Europe wearing several shirts that were holding on for dear life as to not expose her private parts. Even though she’s entitled to look as tacky as she wants, she didn’t even consider the venue when getting dressed. Since the left wants to condemn Melania for this very thing, they should be sure that their favorite first lady isn’t guilty of worse before making the ridiculous comparison.
“There are often subtle messages behind Melania’s outfits and perhaps with the yellow hue, she wanted to convey a sense of intellect as well as encouraging cheerfulness and inspiration,” the Mirror’s report continued. We can agree with this and as long as people are suggesting hidden clothing messages, Michelle’s speaks volumes as to the “woman” she is, which is nothing like Melania.

The Tennessee Senate fired back at the California state government in a biting joint resolution issued in response to California’s travel ban.

The resolution encouraged the governor of Tennessee and the Speakers of the Tennessee House of Representatives and Senate to enact a similar travel ban against California, and urged the other 48 states of the Union to not follow California’s example.

California’s attorney general recently added four states to a list of states deemed to have laws discriminating against LGBT people. California has banned state-funded travel to these states as a show of opposition to those laws, all of which were passed to better protect religious liberties. Tennessee, which is included on that list, pointed out the folly of such a travel ban in the bulk of a joint resolution.
The resolution further stated that California’s travel ban was an attempt to “[impose] their unfounded moral judgment” on other states, and amounted to one sovereign entity telling another sovereign entity how to conduct its government.

A bipartisan letter was released last week requesting comment from former Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Lynch has refused to comply with the letter as she continues to prevent an investigation into her old boss Barack Obama.

However, members of Congress should not expect cooperation from the disgraced Attorney General. When she was asked to testify about the Iran deal, Lynch refused to cooperate and repeatedly pled the Fifth (via The Washington Free Beacon).

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), and then-Representive Mike Pompeo (R-KS), launched an investigation into Obama’s Iran deal last year and requested comment from the then-Attorney General.

Lynch never acknowledged the investigation and asked her underling, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik, to take the heat for her.

Peter Kadzik replied to the request for comment by refusing to answer any of the questions posed. He claimed the administration was unable to comment publicly on the details of the $1.7 billion Iran deal.

Late into Obama’s presidency, his administration negotiated a secret deal with the Iranian government. The final deal was a huge win for the Iranian government and American hostages were released shortly afterwards.

Obama denied that the $1.7 billion was paid in exchange for the hostages. However, representatives from his administration have remained remarkably silent about any other possible motivations.
Sen. Rubio and Rep. Pompeo were outraged that the Obama administration refused to cooperate when they were still in power.

“It is frankly unacceptable that your department refuses to answer straightforward questions from the people’s elected representatives in Congress about an important national security issue,” the pair wrote in a follow-up letter. “Your staff failed to address any of our questions, and instead provided a copy of public testimony and a lecture about the sensitivity of information associated with this issue.”

“This has become the Obama administration’s coping mechanism for anything related to the Islamic Republic of Iran—hide information, obfuscate details, and deny answers to Congress and the American people,” the letter continued.

Lawmakers close to the Iran deal claim that the Obama administration refuses to answer any questions because the answers would be more damning than any consequences of ignoring a congressional inquiry.

We can expect Lynch to maintain this strategy as Congress probes her role in the unmasking of American citizens. However, Lynch no longer has the Obama administration in power to cover her illegal acts.

Michael Flynn is a hero and a dedicated Army legend who understands the threat of radical Islam. He was a staunch supporter of President Trump early on. Unfortunately, he fell victim to the vindictive Deep State and had to resign from his position as National Security Advisor.

New evidence, via Circa, confirms what we patriots have known all along. Flynn’s fall was carefully orchestrated by enemies in the unelected Washington establishment. Bitter FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe brought down Flynn in the act of political revenge! Flynn is innocent!

McCabe was out to get Flynn due to his involvement in a sexual discrimination case leveled against the FBI Deputy Director by one of the bureau’s top anti-terror agents.

Supervisory Special Agent Robyn Gritz was highly respected in the FBI. Her counter-terrorism work was praised by all her colleagues. During her time, she tracked down terrorists, rescued hostages, and was even on the case to find the disappeared agent Robert Levinson in Iran.

Her prestigious career was cut short by the conniving of Andrew McCabe, who recently has been the force behind the Russia probes into the Trump administration. McCabe is one of the biggest puppets the Deep State has it its disposal.

Gritz went to work under McCabe in 2012. Under him, she began receiving negative reviews for the first time in her career. Eventually, the truth came out: this was a case of sexual discrimination. McCabe was doing all he could to sabotage Gritz–including tarnishing her reputation.
Eventually, Gritz’s case went national. She became the central figure on a media exposé into harassment and discrimination in the FBI. Michael Flynn, who was familiar with Gritz due to her counterterrorism work, took up her cause.

Flynn wrote a letter in support of Gritz while he was an Army Lieutenant General and Chief of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Other Federal leaders did the same asserting their willingness to serve as witnesses in Gritz’s hearing.

This sent McCabe into a rage. He got the FBI to promptly send a lawyer to block Flynn and the other intelligence officials from contributing to the Gritz case. Flynn even went public in defense of his colleague, offering an interview on NPR in 2015 in which he testified to her work ethic and invaluable service to this country.

Andrew McCabe never forgot what Flint did. He’s been harboring resentment for the last few years. And when he saw Flint placed in such a high post by a President whose loyalties lie with the people (as opposed to the globalist elite), he became hysterical. Thereafter. McCabe was on a mission to destroy Flynn at all cost.

McCabe used his FBI resources to publish the leaks making it look like Flynn was working inappropriately with Russia. It was all a set-up from the start. Flynn isn’t guilty; he attacked by cowardly men in a personal feud.

Since President Donald Trump was sworn into office, “The Late Show” host Stephen Colbert has somehow managed to keep CBS in the number one spot for late-night TV.

For one reason or another, Colbert’s endless Trump punching bag session was high-quality entertainment to millions of Americans. Things started to go downhill for Colbert on May 1 after he suggested that Trump’s mouth would be a good holster for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s sexual organ. The FCC received 5,700 complaints regarding the monologue.

Less than two weeks ago, Colbert did a skit with a fake Melania Trump. In the skit, the fake Melania suggests by her body language that having a sexual relationship with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is something she fantasizes about.

All the one-sided, over-the-top political commentary is now costing Colbert in ratings. His five-month winning streak is over. And who knocked him out of the top spot? “The Tonight Show” host Jimmy Fallon, who has made it a point not to insult the president or his fanbase.
According to The Wrap:

“The Tonight Show,” hosted by Fallon, won late-night last week with most total viewers, averaging 2.66 million viewers overall compared to “The Late Show’s” 2.62 million.

Fallon also saw a 62 percent demo margin over Colbert, which is its highest since the week of Jan. 9-13. He had a 0.68 rating in the advertiser-coveted 18-49 demographic, compared to Colbert’s 0.42.

This is the second week in a row that “The Tonight Show” can claim its biggest margin of victory versus its biggest competitor in five months.

First Lady Melania Trump hasn’t been living in the White House for too long, but that didn’t stop Michelle Obama’s liberal friends from making sure she got a sick surprise at the recent White House State Dinner. Melania is a big favorite of patriots across the country, who see her as classy and elegant and kind, but there are those on the left who will stop at nothing to hurt her. However, this time, it backfired big time.

First Lady Melania Trump wore a yellow floral floor length gown to meet and dine with Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India and his wife. Right away, Michelle Obama’s friends, who are fashion critics, decided to launch an attack on the first lady as the event was still going on.
Mirror reported, “Melania Trump’s style has come a long way since Donald’s election campaign and we’ve seen her sporting much more tailored looks. But her most recent outfit to meet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House has been met with a bit of criticism.”

“[Fashion critics] questioned whether or not the bold color and print was ‘appropriate’ for the official meeting. It’s possibly more appropriate for a garden party than a formal meeting,” reported AOL. This is a low blow, even for those who praise Michelle Obama’s every look. Considering these “unnamed fashion critics” are the same people who gushed over Michelle Obama’s horrendous fashion mistake just a few weeks ago.
After Barack and Michelle visited Duomo di Siena, a Catholic cathedral, People Magazine gave a nauseating description of Michelle’s “fashion sense,” saying, “During her eight-year tenure as America’s First Lady, it seemed when it came to fashion that Michelle Obama could do no wrong. The FLOTUS with the mostess always struck the perfect note with her ensembles.”

The article, headlined “Michelle Looks ‘MOLTO BELLA’ In Italy,” meaning “very beautiful,” continued, “For the occasion, Michelle continued her contemporary style streak wearing the white cold-shoulder Jamia Top from Club Monaco with a large ruffle across the neckline and lace-up detailing over the arms.”

Funny, they don’t mention the outrage from Italians that followed that horrible top falling off of Michelle. She was visiting a Catholic cathedral, and there is a dress code posted just outside every cathedral, which can also be found online. We can’t stress enough just how wrong that top was at that venue, but you only heard about that from conservatives, not from the mainstream press. Can you imagine if Melania would have done that?

Here’s the crazy thing about all of the fashion critiques — Melania was an international model, held in high regard. It’s a given that she is going to dazzle in the fashion department. Yet, Michelle’s minions continuously make fools out of themselves by posting these unflattering pics of Michelle and then telling us she is “Molto Bella!”

This week, President Donald Trump infuriated liberals when he refused to carry on the tradition of hosting an “iftar” dinner to celebrate Ramadan. Just when Muslims thought he couldn’t get any more “un-Islamic,” Trump has once again angered them by scrapping an even more monumental Barack Obama White House tradition.

Headlines erupted when it was announced that Trump had no plans to schedule a 2017 Eid al-Fitr iftar, the Islamic feast concluding Ramadan that requires the inhumane slaughter of animals. The failure to continue the yearly religious dinner, which has continued since Bill Clinton’s presidency, was a symbol of the current administration’s refusal to appease Islam. However, more significant than Trump’s dinner snub was his recent axing of a far greater Islamic institution stealthily established by Barack Obama.

Just before leaving the White House, Obama created a list on January 13 of Islamic organizations that would receive special grants totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars each. In an act of defiance of his pro-Islam predecessor, the Trump administration has officially trashed the list to prevent several Islamic groups from having access to DHS funds — but he wasn’t finished there. In addition to scrapping the funding, Trump also eliminated Muslim government employees who were linked to the Obama administration and now-defunded Islamic organizations.

Breitbart reports that Obama’s list would’ve included an $800,000 grant to an Islamic seminary in Los Angeles and a $393,000 grant for the Muslim Public Affairs Council Foundation, among others. The taxpayer funds that would’ve gone to Islamic organizations will instead go to organizations that support and cooperate with law enforcement, especially on issues such as terrorism and illegal immigration.

The announcement is being enforced by current U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly, who issued a statement on June 22 acknowledging that Muslim terrorists are, in fact, religiously motivated, WND reports.

“They are out there doing what they think is their religion and think [it is] what they are supposed to be doing … What I’ve elected to do is take what little money I have in this regard and give it to what I consider to be the time-proven things — law enforcement from an outreach point of view and communities developing relationships…”
Expectedly, these comments sparked outrage in the Muslim community but not as much as the subsequent defunding of major Islamic organizations and dismissal of Muslim officials. Kelly reiterated that grants will only be offered to groups that work with law enforcement officers and demonstrate a willingness to discourage adherence to Islam’s violent fundamentals.

“…Grantees were selected in part because of their potential to support law enforcement and other frontline defenders, to demonstrate programmatic effectiveness, and to use taxpayer resources efficiently to create independently sustainable programs. Grants were approved for local law enforcement agencies, state and local government agencies, universities, and non-profit organizations.”
Although Kelly admits that Islamic terrorism is related to Islam, he falsely maintains that Islam is inherently peaceful and that these jihadists have corrupted the religion. Still, this move on behalf of the Trump administration is revolutionary in the crackdown on Islamic terrorism and hate preaching that takes places in mosques across America.

The defunding became official just one day before Ramadan ended this year, which is in stark contrast to Obama’s treatment of the Muslim holiday. In 2016, Obama hosted a lavish iftar, personally divulging in halal meat that had been barbarically slaughtered in accordance with Islamic requirements. While consuming the meal dedicated to Allah, Obama reveled in his Muslim guests’ chants of “four more years!”

Liberal teacher Ariana Gonzalez is not shy about her sex life. Apparently, it’s become so overwhelming that she needs to drive to Mexico to get a drug that she claims she can’t get in the United States. That sounds like an exotic drug that the CDC doesn’t issue here, but the funny thing is, she is also blaming President Trump for the trips she’ll need to make over the border.

The liberals nutjobs are freaking out over the end to Obamacare, so much so, they are conjuring up fake news stories to make Americans believe the insurance apocalypse is upon us all. One story that is so utterly ridiculous is that of Ariana Gonzalez, a liberal loon who teaches high school in El Centro, California, a city on the Mexican border.

According to CNN, who found Gonzalez, the fake news narrative is that poor Ariana’s sex life will end if Obamacare ends, that or she’ll be faced with driving over the border into Mexico to obtained birth control. They report that there is not that many doctors in El Centro, and then, Planned Parenthood moved in and saved Arianna’s sex life.

Now, Arianna could get birth control. But, according to the leftist rhetoric, the villain, Donald Trump, is now in charge, and they claim the Planned Parenthood clinic will be closed down. So, what about poor Arianna? Well, she claims she will be forced to drive to Mexico to get birth control, her sex life is that demanding. If this is starting to sound like bullcrap, you’re right.

CNN reports, “It’s not that the Gonzalezes don’t have insurance; they have very good insurance through Ariana’s job as a high school teacher. The problem is that ‘Trumpcare,’ as Ariana calls it, would probably run her health clinic out of town. It’s Planned Parenthood, which the Republican health care proposal defunds because it performs abortions.”

Here’s the real kicker in the CNN fake news story, they claim Arianna will be forced to take a whole day off work to see a doctor in El Centro, and this is just horrendous. That’s Obamacare for you, so thanks, CNN, for making the point it sucks. “If the Republican plan passes and Planned Parenthood leaves town, Ariana says, her best option would be to cross the border, where she can see a gynecologist immediately. It’s an option she doesn’t want to take but will if she has to,” reports CNN.

Am I missing something here? She has insurance, and her only reason for going to Planned Parenthood is it takes her only a few hours while going to her primary care physician involves a 3-4 hour wait, or so she claims. Driving to Mexico would take a couple hours too. Does anyone really see this woman as being in dire straits?

As Obamacare took over, waits for most doctors became hours. Has Ariana thought that once it’s gone, access to doctors may once again be easier? Instead of letting the liberals use her as propaganda and a very stupid sounding story, she might want to use that education of hers and think this through.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch has finally figured out how bad it looked when she had a private meeting with Bill Clinton on a plane right before the FBI let Hillary off the hook.

The Hill reports:

Lynch says she regrets tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton

Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Sunday that the fallout from her tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton was “painful” for her.

President Trump’s promise to make America great again requires hard work. He can’t do it himself; he needs the support of every American and every lawmaker in Congress.

Many republicans want to help him fulfill his promises. But liberals are pushing back, refusing to cooperate, even if it means we suffer.

And now the Republicans’ latest plan to get things done is surely to ruffle the feathers of fat-cat liberals.

From Daily Caller:

There are only 45 legislative days left until the end of the fiscal year, and some Republicans want Congressional leaders to cancel the annual August recess, forcing members to stay in D.C. and advance healthcare and tax reform.

According to The Hill, some Republicans now believe that getting everything done on time with a 30-day recess coming up would be nearly impossible.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wants a vote on healthcare reform by July 4, but the fight with Democrats over the bill has left the annual budget resolution — needed for tax reform and appropriations legislation — up in the air.

More importantly, if Senate Republicans pass a 2018 budget resolution, then their healthcare bill would only require a simple majority vote. If Republicans vote on the budget resolution without their healthcare bill as part of it, they will need 60 votes to pass the legislation.
Alaska Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan told The Hill he has urged leaders of his conference to cancel the August recess.

“I think absolutely we should truncate or cancel recess. We have a huge agenda. I think we can get a lot of it done, but what we don’t have is time,” said Sullivan. “We can make more time.”

God forbid our lawmakers actually do their job! Republicans are fighting to fix our broken system and all liberals can think about is their time off!

Typical. Donald Trump promised to drain the corrupt swamp of Washington. This is just the kind of corruption he was talking about. Leaders elected to govern our country are too concerned with their time off than to get anything done.

It takes quite a bit of effort to draft legislation, refine it, and get it voted on. That means time. Yet democrats would rather ignore the pressing issues of this country, than sacrifice their vacations.

Why are these people in power again? Why are we tolerating their selfishness? It’s high time the American people ousted these hypocrites and elect true leaders to D.C.