Remember the Colorado bakery which refused to bake a homosexual wedding cake?

Well, it is time for the sequel.
According to our source Western Journalism, on Monday, the United States Supreme Court has voted to hear an appeal from a Colorado bakery which refused to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding. Jack Phillips, the bakery’s owner, claims that he has the right to refuse his service to whoever he wishes to.

In this case, based on his religious beliefs, the Colorado baker refused to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding between Charlie Craig and David Mullins. Reportedly, the opened case will finally determine whether Phillips has the right to refuse his services to the homosexual couple.

According to Phillips, back in August of 2015, the Colorado Court of Appeals violated his right to freedom of religion as well as his constitutional rights by ruling out that he wasn’t allowed to refuse his services to the homosexual couple under Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act. In other words, he was forced to bake the gay wedding cake.

Phillips claims that through his bakery, he found a way to honor our Lord. And he noted that baking a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding would be a way of disrespecting God. “I feel that the Bible is clear — what God defines marriage as,” said the baker.

“For me to violate that would be for me to rebel against God, to take what he’s designed and say it doesn’t matter.” he added. Despite the fact that Colorado is a “public accommodations” state, which forbids the state’s businesses to deny service to costumers based on their sexual orientation, Phillips still refused to bake a cake for the homosexual couple.

“They said you have to create cakes for same-sex couples, so he removed himself from the market. He chose to stop making wedding cakes,” stated Jeremy Todesco, an attorney on Phillips’s behalf.

Back in 2015, the Supreme Court declined a similar case, involving a wedding photographer from New Mexico. Ever since then, many questions have been asked whether business are required to offer their service to same-sex couples. Matter of fact, many states have faced this problem. The case of Jack Phillips versus Charlie Craig and David Mullins will begin in October of 2017.

The socialist Trump-hating government of Canada is having a massive “oh crap” moment after realizing one thing after they “rescued” 3,500 illegal immigrants from the United States in January 2017. Now, the rubber meets the road as the illegal immigrants and the Canadian government both freak out over the huge problem they created together.

According to Daily Mail, over 3,500 illegal immigrants crossed the border from the United States into Canada in January 2017 to avoid being deported by President Donald Trump who promised to rectify our illegal immigration problem.

The socialist lead government of Canada promptly started the cameras rolling and showed the world how “mean and nasty” the United States had become under President Trump. Pictures of desolate illegal aliens starving in the snow, falling into the arms of their Canadian rescuers, filled the internet. However, this progressive parade only lasted a few months. Now, the Canadian government, under their liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, is realizing they have an enormous problem — money, or should we say, lack thereof.
Thousands of illegal immigrants who fled to Canada to escape Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration have become trapped in legal limbo because Canada’s refugee system is now overburdened. The socialist heroes now have thousands of new refugees who cannot find work, permanent housing, or schools for their children. Wow, who would have ever thought that the progressives’ dreams could go so horribly wrong? Is it too soon to give them a resounding, “I told you so”?

The Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) of Canada provided previously unpublished data to Reuters, which states that refugee claims are taking longer to be completed than at any time in the past five years. In essence, the Canadian government just created a problem for themselves and will now be taking more resources from their own citizens to try to fix it.

Without obtaining a hearing with Canada’s IRB, a refugee’s legal status remains in limbo, which means they struggle to convince employers to hire them and have a hard time getting landlords to rent to them. Of course, the benevolent government of Canada, in all of their socialist glory, could just grant everyone citizenship immediately if they really wanted to. After all, it’s just money.

The refugees are also prohibited from taking out loans or accessing student financial aid until they are granted citizenship. Many illegals cannot update academic or professional credentials to meet Canadian standards, which also limits their ability to find work. The IRB’s report also revealed that the refugee system was struggling to process thousands of applications even before the 3,500 new arrivals entered Canada in January.

In addition, the IRB lacks the manpower to adequately complete security screenings for illegal immigrants who are waiting in line. There just aren’t enough tribunal members to hear and decide on the enormous backlog of cases. Over 4,500 hearings originally scheduled in the first four months of 2017 were canceled, according to the data sent to Reuters.

While a carjacker and his accomplices were on trial for the murder of a man who was protecting his wife, the grieving widow gave a heart-wrenching statement. However as soon as the infuriated judge spotted the criminal’s self-satisfying smirk, he shouted him down with 6 words that immediately caused his evil grin to fade.

The West is no longer ignorant of the violent fundamentals of Islam as its barbaric religious compulsions have already begun spreading across our borders. As condemnable as inhumanity committed in the name of Allah is to nearly all who encounter it, perhaps even more disturbing is the left’s willingness to excuse it at all costs. Unfortunately for the Muslim criminals in a particular New Jersey courtroom, there was no ideological supremacy that trumped justice.

Carjackers Basim Henry, 32, Kevin Roberts, 33, Hanif Thompson, 29, and Karif Ford, 31, fatally shot 30-year-old Dustin Friedland as he valiantly tried to defend his 27-year-old wife, Jamie, at the Short Hills mall in December 2013, the New York Daily News reports. Although Jamie made it out alive, she could only cradle her dying husband in her arms as he took his last breath.

Expectedly, Jamie’s final statement during Basim’s trial in Newark was just as heartbreaking as her ordeal. However, Basim, who had participated in the carjacking but was not believed to have killed Dustin, found her devastating grief amusing. Seeing Basim smirking just after Jamie’s emotional address, Judge Ravin’s outrage over the crimes took a very personal turn, prompting him to shout that he can smile all he wants but he’ll be doing it in prison “for the rest of your life!” Footage from within the courtroom shows Basim’s grin slowly subside as the reality of an eternity behind bars starts to set in.
Because his smile proved his remorselessness, Judge Ravin threw the book at him, sentencing him to serve a life sentence without parole eligibility until he has spent at least 68 years and 9 months behind bars. By this time, Basim will be 104 years old, according to NorthJersey.com.

Despite appearing overconfident during the beginning of his hearing, Basim’s despicable arrogance soon morphed into panic. Basim decried Judge Ravin’s harsh sentencing, complaining that he was making and example of him and that he wasn’t “trippin’.” Still, Judge Ravin continued to chastise Basim along with mocking his inappropriate and disrespectful courtroom mannerisms.

“I don’t know what that means,” Ravin said. “But it doesn’t sound like remorse, that’s for sure.”
Although Ravin’s ruling is the maximum penalty, Dustin’s family explained that nothing can atone for his untimely death.

“There is no victory for us today,” Rose Friedland said. “Dustin will not be with us again and there will be two mothers without their sons.”
Jamie still recalls the moment she lost her husband, which included remarks that Basim supposedly found entertaining.

“I turned around and saw Dustin laying there in a pool of blood,” Jamie Friedland said. “I ran over to him, and I was screaming. I was screaming, ‘Stay with me.’ I saw him gasping for breath and his eyes looking at me.”
Basim is the first of the 4 carjackers to receive his sentence, which predicts an equally grim outcome for his accomplices. He was charged with felony murder, murder, carjacking, conspiracy to commit carjacking, possession of a permitless weapon, possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose, and possession of a weapon by a convicted felon. He prior convictions stem from a life of crime beginning when he was still a minor.

In a world in which the nations that are supposed to be the most progressive and enlightened, we see deranged criminals like Basim easily avoid deserved punishment simply because of their minority status. As such, Judge Ravin’s commentary and the subsequent ruling are not only refreshing but, sadly, uncommon.