Barack Obama jetted off to Indonesia on Friday with his family for another luxury vacation. However, Rep. Trey Gowdy doesn’t think it’s a coincidence that Obama has chosen to head to a country that has no extradition agreement with the U.S. right as the investigation into former Attorney General Loretta Lynch is heating up.

Mad World News reported that Obama chose to head to Indonesia right after the Senate Intelligence Committee opened an investigation into Lynch’s handling of the Hillary Clinton probe. Gowdy would now like to know when Obama plans to come back to the U.S., because he has some questions to ask him.

“Let me hazard a wild guess: that there may be something else on that server that they didn’t want law enforcement to see?” Gowdy said. “That is where you start. I don’t like speculating, but I have dealt in the past with victims who would not cooperate with investigations. Typically, the reason is, there is something else you do not want law enforcement to see.”

Newt Gingrich penned an explosive article the Washington Examiner Monday morning, putting special counsel Robert Mueller on blast for filling “his presidential hunting expedition with liberal lawyers.”

Gingrich highlighted the fact that yet another Democrat donor has been added to Mueller’s investigative team- Elizabeth Prelogar, an attorney in the Office of the Solicitor General who has given a total of $750 to Obama and Hillary presidential campaigns. According to Gingrich, she joins four other attorneys on the team who have donated over $50,000 combined to Democrat campaigns.
But that’s not all, he notes two important numbers that also bolster the idea of Mueller’s Democratic bias:

Department of Justice employees gave $286,797 to the Clinton campaign in 2016, and a mere $8,756 to Trump.
Mueller was a partner at WilmerHale law firm before being appointed special counsel. Employees from this law firm donated a collective $326,798 to Clinton in 2016 and $628 to Trump. Mueller has also been recruiting lawyers from this firm to work on the Trump investigation.
Three of Mueller’s seven identified attorney’s have worked for both the DOJ and WilmerHale. The other four come from other federal agencies. Gingrich asks an important question:

“How could any reasonable person say that a group of attorneys from either the Department of Justice or WilmerHale will be honest, objective truth-seekers, when it is clear that so many gave overwhelmingly to Hillary Clinton?”

This Russia investigation is turning into an ideological witch hunt with so many liberal lawyers involved the investigation. Gingrich is one of the few people speaking out against Mueller’s obvious bias, and of course the media isn’t covering it.

While the GOP is filled with its share of spineless cowards, there are still a few solid folks fighting for the conservative cause.

One of those is Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who has earned a reputation for his direct and unflinching questions at committee hearings.

During a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing this week, in which Attorney General Jeff Sessions was testifying, Cotton took a moment to destroy the Left’s narrative about Trump’s supposed Russia collusion.

As reported at Liberty Writers, Cotton mocked the allegations, sarcastically asking Sessions about them.

“Mr. Sessions, are you familiar with what spies call trade craft?” Cotton asked, prompting the attorney general to warily reply, “A little bit.”

“That involves things like covert communications and dead drops and brush passes, right? Do you like spy fiction? Do you like Jason Bourne or James Bond movies?” Cotton continued before bashing the sham investigation.

“Have you ever, ever in any of these fantastical situations heard of a plot line so ridiculous that a sitting United States senator and an ambassador of a foreign government colluded at an open setting with hundreds of other people to pull off the greatest caper in the history of espionage?” he asked, which prompted Sessions to laugh.

Cotton also blasted Hillary Clinton for her outrageous claims that the only reason she lost the election was due to the fictional Russian interference.

“Since her election defeat, Hillary Clinton has blamed her loss on the Russians, Vladimir Putin, the FBI agent James Comey, fake news, Wikileaks, Twitter, Facebook and my personal favorite, content farms in Macedonia,” Cotton pointed out.

If you’ll remember, when Trump was trolling the media, saying he might not accept election results if he lost and there was evidence of Democratic vote rigging, the media and Hillary alike denounced him.

Hillary specifically said that not accepting the results of the election meant Trump was a “direct threat to democracy.”

But isn’t it funny how she and the Left have refused to accept the results, despite saying these hyperbolic things? Hillary recently made the rounds to offer up all these excuses and more, and

Hillary recently made the rounds to offer up all these excuses and more, and they were taken seriously by her left-wing media comrades.

They’re intent on riding this narrative into the ground, no matter how many times it’s proven false or how shameless it makes them look.

Of the thousands of emails leaked from John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, that were published by Wikileaks, one in particular stated that officials from the government of Qatar had pledged $1 million to the Clinton Foundation to celebrate Bill Clinton’s 65th birthday, funds which the foundation did not report to the State Department.

And that’s a HUGE problem, as it seems to violate an ethics agreement Hillary Clinton signed when she became Secretary of State in 2009, when she promised the foundation would notify the State Department’s ethics official if a new foreign government wanted to donate or “increase materially” its contributions.
According to Reuters:

If a new foreign government wished to donate or if an existing foreign-government donor, such as Qatar, wanted to “increase materially” its support of ongoing programs, Clinton promised that the State Department’s ethics official would be notified and given a chance to raise any concerns.

Clinton Foundation officials last month declined to confirm the Qatar donation. In response to additional questions, a foundation spokesman, Brian Cookstra, this week said that it accepted the $1 million gift from Qatar, but this did not amount to a “material increase” in the Gulf country’s support for the charity. Cookstra declined to say whether Qatari officials received their requested meeting with Bill Clinton.

Officials at Qatar’s embassy in Washington and in its Council of Ministers in the capital, Doha, declined to discuss the donation.

The State Department has said it has no record of the foundation submitting the Qatar gift for review, and that it was incumbent on the foundation to notify the department about donations that needed attention. A department spokeswoman did not respond to additional questions about the donation.

According to the foundation’s website, which lists donors in broad categories by cumulative amounts donated, Qatar’s government has directly given a total of between $1 million and $5 million over the years.

Additionally, even though Hillary Clinton promised she would offer an annual list of donors to the Clinton Health Access Initiative, in 2016, the Foundation admitted that it had not published a list of its donors since 2010.

As Reuters also noted, Clinton Foundation officials acknowledged they sometimes did not comply with the central provisions of the agreement with the Obama administration, and they blamed oversights in some of those cases.

However, at least eight other countries in addition to Qatar gave new or increased funding to the foundation, most often for the Clinton Health Access Initiative, without the state department being informed. Foundation officials have said some of those donations, were also oversights and should have been flagged, while others, did not qualify as “material increases.”

There is a big pressure. On Monday, a dozen Republican House members publicly called for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to completely recuse herself from the imminent discussions regarding the travel ban case because of her comments about President Donald Trump.

The request came in the form of a letter to Ginsburg. Here’s what it said:
“Your public criticism of Donald Trump during the campaign included statements such as, ‘I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president.’ You referred to Donald Trump as ‘a faker.’ When asked about the possibility of Donald Trump winning the presidency, you responded, ‘I don’t want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs.’

You are bound by law to recuse yourself from participation in this case. There is no doubt that your impartiality can be reasonable questioned, indeed, it would be unreasonable not to question your impartiality.”

Newsmax reports:

The letter was signed by Duncan and Reps. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., Brian Babin, R-Texas, Don Bacon, R-Neb., Scott Desjarlais, R-Tenn., Neal Dunn, R-Fla., Jack Bergman, R-Mich., Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., Rod Blum, R-Iowa, Ted Budd, R-N.C., Warren Davidson, R-Ohio and Thomas Garrett, R-Va.

The court agreed to hear arguments in the case in October. However, it allowed portions of the travel ban go into effect, according to CNN.

President Donald Trump celebrated the unanimous per curiam opinion by the Supreme Court, effectively clearing lower court attempts to stay his travel ban, calling it a “clear victory” for national security.
“Today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision is a clear victory for our national security,” the president said in a statement to reporters.

Trump’s ban sought to limit people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the United States, citing a national security risk.
Despite efforts from lower courts to block the ban, the Supreme Court decided that foreign nationals lacking a “bona fide” relationship with someone in the United States could be banned. Parts of Trump’s executive order, however, remain blocked.

“As president, I cannot allow people into our country who want to do us harm,” Trump’s statement said. “I want people who can love the United States and all of its citizens, and who will be hardworking and productive.”

The court upheld Trump’s right to executive authority.

Nancy Pelosi is digging in her heels and refusing to step down as more and more Democrats call for her ouster. She’s having a really bad week and she looks royally ticked off. This morning CBS showed a video that was a compilation of Democrats calling for her to just leave already. Arrogant as ever, Pelosi defiantly states: “I’m here … they had their time on TV.” The Wicked Witch of the West is not going to go quietly it would seem. She’s a political monster who has ruled the Democrats for 30 years.

It must really bite to have your once-loyal minions turn on you like this. It’s been all over television for days ever since Ossoff lost the Georgia special election. The Democrats were incensed that Handel’s ads effectively tied Ossoff to Pelosi and blamed her for the loss. Personally, I think they lost just because they suck and they are Marxists. But that’s just me. The Dems have had four losses this year and they want a sacrificial goat… that would be Pelosi and she does fit the bill. But she’s not going to go out that easily.
From The Washington Free Beacon:

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) did not appear pleased Monday that “CBS This Morning” greeted her with a montage of Democrats calling for her to step aside from her position as House minority leader, saying, “I’m here … they had their time on TV.”

CBS played a series of clips of Democrats like Reps. Kathleen Rice (D., N.Y.), Tim Ryan (D., Ohio), Seth Moulton (D., Mass.), and Filemon Vela (D., Texas) calling for her to step aside as minority leader in the wake of four special House election losses in 2017.

Pelosi smiled as host Charlie Rose asked for her response.

“I’m here, and we’re hearing all these other people. They had their time on TV,” she said. “This is such a small item. It isn’t about me. Right now, our fight is about the Affordable Care Act. I’ve always had a challenge in the caucus, right from the start.”

Nancy Pelosi basically stated that winning isn’t everything… to which the anchor on CBS went, huh? She kept repeating that the Democrats had cut into the Republicans’ margins in those races and tried to spin losses as really wins. That might work with some out there, but the Democrats themselves know better. She also said it was nothing new that Democrats want her to step aside. Well yeah… she’s got too much power and has been there since the dinosaurs came and went.

“These people were against me last November,” she said. “They started this before. The fact is this. I led [in 2006]to take us to a majority, became speaker of the House. President Obama became president. He was our spokesperson for eight years. We just lost the election. We could write a message, but the fact is, we need our members to write the message.” Pelosi thinks she will rise to power once more and again become Speaker of the House. The Botox has finally taken over her brain entirely.

We’ve all seen good ole Congresswoman from California, Auntie Maxine, spewing her hate-filled vitriol against President Donald Trump and us, his supporters. But sadly for her, it’s starting to look like the tables have turned and us Red Blooded Patriotic Americans have just about had enough of her crap.

As you can see in the video below a Southern California woman finally had enough of this hateful woman’s rhetoric and went off on the hate mongering witch during a protest.
This woman yelled at Waters about how the black community has been hurt by all this illegal immigration she has been pushing because all the jobs have gone to illegals instead of the blacks who live in Inglewood. And she made it very clear that Waters is a hateful racist against her own race. Bravo!

The best part about all this is that the woman who told Waters these cold hard truths was a fellow Black Woman. I really hope this woman runs against her. From the looks at how the people of Inglewood have woken up lately, she might actually beat her.
As you can see it 2017 hasn’t turned out to be a very good year for the good auntie.
American Thinker Reports:

Maxine Waters: A Gift That Keeps Giving

Congresswoman Maxine Waters failed to anticipate her “destroy Trump” campaign would have an unpleasant boomerang effect on her own political career.

She experienced an unwanted surprise this week when returning to her posh home in Hancock Park after making the media rounds in the so-called impeachment campaign against President Trump.

Protestors had gathered outside her LA mini-mansion waving placards that read: “Impeach Maxine Waters” and “Do Your Job,” referring to the congresswoman’s 35-year tenure representing the infamous suburb of Compton. “She’s not representing her constituents, especially the black constituents,” complained one of the protestors before the KABC media crew. “She thinks by putting down our president, we’re going to like her more,” complained another protestor. “Every time she talks, she makes me want to throw up.” That can’t be good for her re-election chances.

Not all was doom-and-gloom on the scene. There was even a mariachi band that allowed the gathering to protest in style.

Apparently, Waters is too distracted as the new media darling — dubbed “Auntie Maxine” by fawning reporters — to perform her job. Her long history of corruption and abysmal performance in office never seems to make its way into the conversation among her co-conspirators (aka reporters) in the mainstream media.

It is a perverse irony that President Trump works round-the-clock to make inroads to improve the lives of Americans in his few months in office, and Waters with a whopping 35 years on the job continues representing a district where the socioeconomic conditions grow progressively worse.

According to the Washington Examiner, Clint Eastwood hasn’t been happy with Michael Moore since 2005. At the National Board Review dinner in 2005, both were present to be honored for Bowling for Columbine and Million Dollar Baby. And long before Moore was taking cheap shots at the hit movie American Sniper and Chris Kyle, Eastwood had this to say…

Clint Eastwood accepted his award, and said the following, “Michael Moore and I actually have a lot in common – we both appreciate living in a country where there’s free expression,”

Then came the . . . joke.

“But, Michael, if you ever show up at my front door with a camera – I’ll kill you.”

The audience laughed, Moore laughed, then Eastwood said, “I mean it. . .”

Attorney General Loretta Lynch is fighting for her freedom. She knows what she did. And worse, the whole world does too.

James Comey, the former FBI director testified under oath about her criminal behavior in front of Congress and a national audience.

That is on record. But Comey, he is such a goddamn showboat, actually tried to downplay Loretta Lynch’s criminal obstruction of an FBI investigation.

Confirmed showboat James Comey downplaying a chance to get publicity? Doesn’t happen often so he must be hiding something really big about her.

For Comey not to milk Lynch’s crimes for all the publicity he could you just know there is something else nefarious going on here.

It’s not in Comey’s nature.

Maybe, just maybe the real scandal is Lynch and her crimes and Russia is just a smokescreen to hide this fact.

According to the Hill, Lynch is starting to change her tune in a plea for leniency.

Loretta said, if you can believe this, that she now regrets the infamous tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton that sunk Hillary’s presidential hopes.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch went further and said that the fallout from meeting with former President Bill Clinton was “painful” for her personally.

You ain’t seen nothing yet Loretta. Painful is when the doors slam shut on you the first night in the slammer.

“I do regret sitting down and having a conversation with him, because it did give people concern. And as I said, my greatest concern has always been making sure that people understand that the Department of Justice works in a way that is independent and looks at everybody equally,” Lynch said before continuing her plea for leniency,