Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
It’s been two months since Bill O’Reilly was fired from Fox News after a series of sexual harassment claims against him came to light. Now, he is making his return to the spotlight, and Fox isn’t going to like what he has to say.

CNN reported that O’Reilly spoke out at a show in Westbury, New York last weekend to say that the truth about his firing is about to come out.

“In the weeks to come, there will be a bunch of news stories that will explain what happened and why it happened,” O’Reilly said. “It’s pretty grisly. It’s pretty nasty. It has to do with far-left progressive organizations that are bent on destroying anybody with whom they disagree, including the president.”

“I can’t really get into depth about why I left Fox and what’s going to happen now,” he explained Saturday, “because my lawyers are pleading with me, ‘For once in your life, O’Reilly, could you just shut up?’”
These comments were made during a stop on O’Reilly’s “The Spin Stops Here Tour,” which he has been doing with conservative comedian Dennis Miller since 2011. O’Reilly shocked his fans during the show by suggesting that he is about to start his own network, which would be a direct rival of Fox.

“There could be a new network,” O’Reilly said. “A bunch of people are looking to compete with Fox because there’s a perception of decline.”

“I am starting my own operation. We are going to do that,” he added, revealing that he will soon be rolling out a ‘beta-test’ for a newscast.

“We will go into a studio and here it will look like ‘The Factor,’” O’Reilly continued. “It’s basically an experiment to see how many people are going to want this service. That’s coming and will be here before September in a robust form. But I suspect there will be another network maybe merging with us. There will be a network that rises up because the numbers for Fox are going down.”

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
A college professor for Essex County was suspended indefinitely after she appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show and had a heated exchange with the host. Many viewers were disgusted when the woman, Lisa Durden, defended a “black people only” Memorial Day party. Viewers claimed racism because the party was for a particular race only and neglected the basic human rights of all people of other races. To put it straight forward – if you weren’t black, then you weren’t invited.

It didn’t matter what sex, nationality, or country of origin you were from. If you weren’t black, then you weren’t allowed to attend the party.

Most people understand that is how racism works and have labeled Lisa Durden as a racist. Essex County College wasn’t having it. They apparently don’t support racist employees at their establishment. This is the first time I’ve ever heard of the college, but I’m very glad they don’t support horrible racists.

A Memorial Day party should be for everyone. Black, white, Asian, and even vote-swaying Russians should be allowed (ha, that’s funny, right) in the party. If this was a special event for members of a team, such as a formal event for a football or baseball team and their wives/girlfriends, then sure – teammates only. But that’s NOT a color issue or racist. That’s called it’s a private event for a club. This was just a Memorial Day party advertised for blacks only and that’s completely unfair to everyone else who wants to be there and cannot enter because they were unfortunately born another race or color. Ironically, if a white person born in South Africa showed up, who is clearly way more African than anyone at the black only Memorial Day party – then they would sadly be turned down.

Continuing with a similar attitude she had on the show, Durden spoke to The Star-Ledger and said, “they did this to humiliate me,” she said.

“Essex County College publicly lynched me in front of my students.”

Wrong, stupid. You supported an event that only a racist idiot would stand up for. This was nonsense. You can’t have “blacks only” or “whites only” anymore. Segregation ended years ago, so stop trying to bring it back, you damn racist twit. Progress means moving forward, not repeating horrible times in history. The use of the word lynch suggests she’s the victim of slavery and extremely racist times. This is not those days. She was not lynched. Her use of the word lynched is inappropriate and irresponsible.
According to The Star-Ledger, Durden received a letter signed by the College’s vice president for academic affairs, Jeffrey Lee, which informed her she was suspended “until further notice.”

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
First Lady Melania Trump has been settling into her new role since moving into the White House two weeks ago, owning every part of the opportunity and impressing the world as she does it. She’s graceful classy and the picture of the American dream, having come over the right way as an immigrant and reaching making it all the way to the Washington, D.C. where she is today.

While the left was quick to discredit her ability to take on this notable role, she hasn’t ceased to impress, which they refuse to admit. A rumor of the first lady’s future began to circulate this week and now the Trumps are prepared to confirm what everyone is inquiring about.

Melania hadn’t been seen too much while planning this transition from New York City to Washington, D.C., until she stepped off Marine Force one with the president and their young son, Barron. This gave the left the opportunity to attack, which they did, but not nearly as bad as when she was seen a second time since the move, while she and President Trump were meeting with Panamanian President Juan Carlos Varela at the White House on June 19.

As the couple has done with every dignitary they’ve met with, they stepped out for a photo op. Melania looked stunning in a light blue dress, a color reminiscent of the incredible ensemble she wore to her husband’s inauguration. This one was form-fitting and appropriate for the season, designed by Michael Kors, who is one of the few in his industry willing to let her wear his clothing line.

However, it wasn’t the dress or the $1,695 price tag on it that people were talking about, it was something else that sparked a disgusting rumor and nearly broke the Internet with a couple specific search terms.

Opposing Views reports:

“The dress seems to be the catalyst which caused Google searches for the phrase ‘Melania Trump belly’ to increase more than 4,000 percent, according Google Trends statistics cited by The Inquisitr.”
“The search phrase ‘Is Melania Trump pregnant?’ increased 1,000 percent, and ‘Melania Trump blue dress’ went up 750 percent, as did ‘Melania pregnant now’.”
While Melania looks svelte and statuesque, it seems that the world was focused on the normal curvature of a woman’s body in her abdomen, which is often airbrushed out in glossy magazines, online, and in ads. The expectations that a 47-year-old woman, who also had a child in her 30s, is supposed to have a flat stomach is as alarming as the rumor that she’s expecting a child based on a slight bump in her dress. It’s confirmed now that a baby is not in her future, but more criticism of her body, which most women would love to look like (including her detractors) probably is.

“The 47-year-old first lady would not be the first celebrity to give birth at such an age, Opposing Views pointed out, citing a written observation by Parenting Magazine. “Singer Gwen Stefani gave birth at age 44, actress Susan Sarandon at 45, and actress Gina Davis had twins at 48,” the report continued. However, Melania doesn’t seem to be following in the footsteps of these celebrities, not that there would be a single thing wrong with it if she decided to do so.

Stephanie Grisham, who is the spokesperson for the first lady quickly shut down the rumor mill by confirming that the pregnancy allegation is not true. “Obviously that is absolutely false,” Grisham said, according to The Inquisitr. However, pregnancy rumor isn’t the only disgusting falsehood being spread about Melania and her personal life with Donald Trump.

“Another viral set of tweets, posted by a popular blogger who has said she wants the president’s ‘whole wretched family out of power,’ alleged that Melania is having an affair, Opposing Views reported.

“But here it is: word is, for many years, Melania’s been having an affair with the head of security at Tiffany’s in the Trump Tower lobby…with DT’s knowledge. They had an agreement (written, I think) that if DT lost the election, they’d get divorced. But then he won. So they had to renegotiate the agreement. She is imprisoned in that marriage for as long as he’s president. Again: this is kind of obvious already to anyone with eyes. Melania looks miserable. But this would be a broader illustration of why. Also, it’s why she doesn’t leave New York,” the Tweet claims, according to The Inquisitr.

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
After 10 months of intense investigation into the phony Trump-Russia probe, with zero evidence to support the lies that President Trump colluded with Russia to “steal” the election from Hillary, the lying liberal media is forced to “abandon ship.”

Now, anti-Trump zealots like The New York Times are having to admit there’s no evidence and the stories they’ve published for MONTHS on end are “fakes.”

From The Blaze

New York Times columnist David Brooks admitted in his column Tuesday that, despite the dominant news media narrative that President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had improper contacts with Russia during last year’s election, there is “little evidence” to suggest any criminal wrongdoing.

Ever since Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in last year’s presidential election, the dominant narrative from the left and mainstream media has been that Trump rose to the White House by some nefarious means.
Trump’s opponents for months have said that his campaign “colluded” with Russian operatives last year to undermine Clinton’s campaign — and ultimately American democracy. They point to meetings that now-Attorney General Jeff Sessions had with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak.
But despite near constant coverage of the alleged collusion by the media, in addition to an active FBI investigation, there has been little evidence to prove the allegations are true, something Brooks admitted Tuesday.

“There may be a giant revelation still to come. But as the Trump-Russia story has evolved, it is striking how little evidence there is that any underlying crime occurred — that there was any actual collusion between the Donald Trump campaign and the Russians,” Brooks wrote.

“There were some meetings between Trump officials and some Russians, but so far no more than you’d expect from a campaign that was publicly and proudly pro-Putin. And so far nothing we know of these meetings proves or even indicates collusion,” Brooks explained.