Category Archives: Wikipedia

Wikipedia has become a dangerous platform for medical disinformation and propaganda – Prepare for Change

 

While Wikipedia may seem like a useful site if you need quick information at hand for trivial topics like the average population of Kazakhstan, its reliability and validity have long been questioned by professors, intellectuals and even the media. One reason for this distrust is the fact that quite a bit of the information on Wikipedia is either incomplete or downright false. Because anyone can technically edit or contribute to Wikipedia, the site is vulnerable to hackers and vandalism.

There is also the fact that strings at Wikipedia are being pulled and controlled by corporate influences. Once corporate America realized that Wikipedia was distributing information they had carefully and thoroughly suppressed in the media, they launched a plan that ensured they had the final say on what did and did not get published.

Articles on Wikipedia that go against the corporate line are quickly edited out and replaced by more mainstream-friendly versions. Writers who post material that offends the status quo are subsequently banned by editors who consider themselves to be unbiased. Over the years, entries about natural healing, holistic medicine and other subjects began to resemble publicity blurbs from Monsanto, Merck or the NIH. Contributors are supposed to be anonymous “volunteers,” but it is clear that for certain sensitive subjects, this is far from the case. (RELATED: Get all the news the fake media is hiding from you at Censored.news)

Take for example their page about chemotherapy. The article is very pro-chemo. There is no mention of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s study that finds that chemotherapy makes cancer much worse. Adverse effects are not mentioned until well towards the end of the article. This is just one article out of hundreds where Wikipedia has been allowed to only report one side of a very serious matter, and it’s the side that’s footing their bill…

Source: Wikipedia has become a dangerous platform for medical disinformation and propaganda – Prepare for Change

Advertisements

‘Pizzagate’ investigator’s journalistic background scrubbed from Wikipedia, YouTube video taken down over 2011 Andrew Breitbart tweet alleging John Podesta’s involvement as ‘sex slave operator?’ — Intellihub

YouTuber exposes how Andrew Breitbart may have made ‘Pizzagate’ connections back in 2011, before he was found dead in 2012 (INTELLIHUB) — David Seaman, a former staff writer for The Street, contributor to the Huffington Post and ‘Pizzagate’ investigator, recently had Wikipedia list his page for “deletion” and YouTube remove one of his videos about ‘Pizzagate’…

via ‘Pizzagate’ investigator’s journalistic background scrubbed from Wikipedia, YouTube video taken down over 2011 Andrew Breitbart tweet alleging John Podesta’s involvement as ‘sex slave operator?’ — Intellihub

Hillary Literally Became the Definition of ‘Pathological Lying’ on Google Yesterday — The Event Chronicle

By Josie Wales If you had happened to Google the term ‘pathological lying’ on Sunday evening, you would have been met with none other than the bright, smiling face of presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton. Before Wikipedia administrators put a temporary lock on the entry early Monday morning, the top Google result for the term was a link to…

via Hillary Literally Became the Definition of ‘Pathological Lying’ on Google Yesterday — The Event Chronicle

Ian Greenhalgh VT 9-21-16… “Russia Govt. Report: Snowden, Greenwald are CIA frauds”

Kauilapele's Blog

veterans_today_ian_greenhalgh_banner_10I’m posting this article by Ian Greenhalgh because I believe it is a blockbuster! I say “I believe”, because I have not even come close to reading this entire thing. And although I sense the “blockbusteriness” of this article and report, there’s no way I’m going to try to get through it all now (I need a MAJOR MOCHA in front of me to read this fully!).

As I recall, Gordon Duff (and Jim Dean?) has occasionally pointed out that both Julian Assange and Edward Snowden have been, and still are, CIA assets (here are two from VT, written just after the 6-6-13 Snowden revelations: VT1 (6-18-13), VT2 (7-8-13)). Apparently this Russian report goes into detail about all of that. That said, although I’ve only read portions of this, I will highlight as best I can and attempt to give a flavor of what’s in this article.

View original post 13,012 more words