Trump’s White House Payroll Projected to Save Taxpayers $22,000,000 Over Obama’s White House

-Billionaires are working for FREE to “Make America Great Again”
-Multimillionaires are working for $30,000 salaries to “Make America Great Again”
-No “Czars”
-No Expensive Fellowships
-Nineteen fewer assistants for Melania than Michelle

On Friday, the White House released their annual financial report on White House personnel to Congress. The report included the positions and salaries of all 337 White House employees. This projected salary savings for Trump’s White House over a four year period exceeds $22 million. Female staffers are making as much as men. There are billionaires working for free. There are multi-millionaires working for $30,000 per year. The President donates his entire $400,0000 salary to the National Park Service.

According to Forbes, here are some key findings:

-There are 110 fewer employees on White House staff under Trump than under Obama at this point in their respective presidencies.

-$5.1 million in payroll savings vs. the Obama FY2015 payroll. In 2017, the Trump payroll amounts to $35.8 million for 377 employees, while the Obama payroll amounted to $40.9 million for 476 employees (FY2015).

-Nineteen fewer staffers are dedicated to The First Lady of the United States (FLOTUS). Currently, there are five staffers dedicated to Melania Trump vs. 24 staffers who served Michelle Obama (FY2009).

-Counts of the “Assistants to the President” – the most trusted advisors to the president – are the same (22) in both first-year Trump and Obama administrations. In the Trump White House, Steven Bannon, Kellyanne Conway, Omarosa Manigault, Reince Priebus, Sean Spicer and 17 others make salaries of $179,700. In Obama’s first-year, David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel and twenty others held the title with top pay of $172,000.

-The highest compensated White House Trump staffer? Mark House, Senior Policy Advisor, has a salary of $187,500. Mr. House is “on detail” from a federal agency which allows him to exceed the top pay-grade of $179,700. In Obama’s Administration (2009), David Marcozzi earned $193,000 “on detail” from Health and Human Services.

Review of the Trump White House payroll confirms shows five full time staffers are five staffers dedicated to First Lady Melania Trump. Michelle Obama had twenty four. What a disgrace!

Many people feel that if they pay a premium for a product from a reputable company that they are getting top quality for their dollar. Unfortunately, this doesn’t seem to be the case as one of the country’s most loved and consumed brand has just been hit with a devastating blow to their customer base after they were caught sneaking human feces into their overpriced product.

If the bitter burned taste of Starbucks doesn’t leave a bad enough taste in your mouth, their catering to Islam and hate for President Donald Trump probably does, but now that test results confirm customers’ worst nightmare, even their staunchest liberals supporters are seeking other places to get their daily fix without the side of feces, which probably got in there through the sickest of means.

Starbucks’ Public Relations person has probably been working overtime to cover the company’s backside from the second they alienated conservatives, but now their work s really cut out for them after unfortunate test results prove what they have been snekaing into their cup of joe. The company’s CEO telling customers who supported traditional marriage to get their coffee somewhere else turned out be doing right-wingers a favor who were spared consuming more of their dangerous beverages considering the nasty punch they have in them that millions of customers have been unaware they drinking.

After Starbucks pledged to hire 10,000 Muslim refugees to rebuke President Trump’s initial travel ban back in January, they committed enterprise suicide. That disgusting decision made people wonder what would happen to the quality of their product and customer service with illiterate third-world people with foul customs running shops. That nightmare has just come to fruition, perhaps regardless of the refugees hiring spree, with test results proving that Starbucks is literally full of crap.
Conservative Daily Post reports:

Many people around the world enjoy iced coffee and other cool drinks from baristas employed by Starbucks, Caffe Nero, and Costa Coffee. However, they may want to think twice before ordering again. The BBC’s “Watchdog” program performs consumer affairs checks on popular businesses. Their latest discovery found fecal bacteria in samples from the three popular coffee chains.
Yes, that’s right, bacteria that is present in feces is now included with customer’s ice at Starbucks, Caffe Nero, and Costa Coffee.

Samples taken from various stores found changeable levels of contamination. Head of policy at the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health Tony Lewis said that the amounts were “concerning.” He added that the bacteria “should not be present at any level – never mind the significant numbers found.”

The investigation tested 30 different branches of the chain to make this determination, which included taking samples to check how sanitary the tables, trays, and ice are. While this is probably not the first test of Starbucks products, it’s is the only one to result in evidence that the new item on the menu is actual fecal matter that customers are getting from free with their overpriced beverages. It’s probably of no coincidence that this comes soon after doves of dirty refugees were handed out employment to make a political point that’s clearly backfired on the company now.

After all of the travel ban debate and the tug of war on this executive order between liberal judges and our president, the Supreme Court decided to officially uphold Trump’s wishes on the matter. This resolve led to Starbucks immediately speaking out to say that they strengthening their commitment of hiring Muslim refugees. They followed through by bringing on 2,500 in England and other parts of Europe, right before fecal matter showed up in their products.

The problem with hiring and accepting refugees is the cultural hygienic difficulties it creates. In Germany and France, the situation is so dire that a company has invented a “multicultural toilet,” Conservative Daily Post explains. Despite pictogram instructions, third world invaders don’t understand how to use Western facilities.

“Many migrants will have never seen toilet paper before,” writes one Deutsche Welle journalist. He added, “refugees nationwide have squatted on toilet rims or the floor of the bathroom… others have relieved themselves in the shower stalls, leaving behind human excrement on the floors.”

Of all the wonderful things that President Donald Trump says and does, liberals are particularly triggered by his promise to build a wall on the Mexican border.

Liberals hate the idea of a border wall for two reasons.
First, it hurts their precious feelings. They get sad when they realize that people need to be deported in order for us to live in a nation of laws. In their minds, America is a magical place filled with candy and unicorns, where everyone is allowed to just hop in and get free stuff. Little do they know that the real world does not work this way, and that this mentality has devastated our economy.

Second, and perhaps most importantly, liberals hate the wall because they know that its existence would shrink a valuable Democratic voting bloc. Millions of illegal immigrants vote for Democratic candidates. Whether it’s because they are forced to by local politicians or because they truly support the liberal platform, illegals vote en masse for Democrats. Since Democrats have come to rely on illegal support to win elections, they bend over backwards to grow the illegal population. They know that any plan to restrict illegal immigration would hurt their electoral chances, and thus they oppose the wall.

As a result, liberals were quick to celebrate when the administration announced that it would delay plans to build a wall. They got so carried away with excitement that they even made fun of the president and his supporters for believing that such a project could be completed in the first place.

Now, however, the joke is on them.

As reported by Fox News: The agency in charge of U.S. border security plans to start building prototypes for President Trump’s proposed wall with Mexico later this summer. Ronald Vitiello, Customs and Border Protection’s acting deputy commissioner, said Tuesday that four to eight companies will get contracts for prototypes in San Diego that could be models for the roughly 2,000-mile border. Companies will have 30 days to complete the models.

Watch this video about a possible wall prototype:
It looks like we will get our wall, and it looks like it will be better than anyone expected. Leave it to President Trump to take a construction project and make it even better. Most people expected the wall to consist of simple concrete slabs. Trump, on the other hand, wants only the best. That is why he is open to a more innovative wall, which contains solar panels and other fascinating high-tech features. Of course Mexico cannot be happy about this, watching their rich high-tech neighbor come up with solutions that will allow them to keep out illegals and make money back while they are at it. All while they still worry that Trump will penalize them on trade for the way they have hurt America’s economy all these years.

Regardless of the wall’s exact nature, Americans should be ecstatic that a wall will end up being built. Our southern border has been wide open for far too long. Millions of individuals, including criminals, gang members, and terrorists, have entered the United States by simply passing over some bushes or a small wire fence. Once they arrive here, they sell drugs and commit other crimes. Even non-criminal illegal immigrants cause problems by taking jobs and receiving welfare benefits. This must come to an end if we ever want to fix our broken economy and culture.

The President is in deep trouble again. One would think he had had enough controversy for one week considering his smackdown with two MSNBC hosts. Another video was released showing the President beating up CNN. The video was a 2007 remade WWE wrestling video of the WrestleMania 23 promotion where the President pretended to beat up WWE Chairman Vince McMahon. However, in the video, the President is seen beating up McMahon who’s been replaced with a CNN logo.

After the video shows Trump beating up on McMahon with the CNN logo on top the screen goes to a logo that says, “FNN Fraud News Network.” The President tweeted out the following response with his video,
“#FraudNewsCNN #FNN’. The official @POTUS handle also retweeted the video that appears to be a literal embodiment of his assault against the media.”

The President has jokingly admitted in public that CNN should change their name to fraud because of all the fraudulent stories they have been printing. He has maintained that his use of social media is modernized and there is nothing wrong with it. The video that the President released stemmed from a Reddit thread that most Trump supporters had been and were following.
In response to the release of the video CNN made a formal statement saying, “It is a sad day when the President of the United States encourages violence against reporters. Clearly, Sarah Huckabee Sanders lied when she said the President had never done so.” They went on to say that Trump’s comments were beneath the dignity of the office he holds. The relationship between the two has been bad for some time. He at one point said that the media is the enemy of the American people. As well, on numerous occasions, he has pointed out fake or false articles published by various outlets as an example of the bias they have against him.

Martha Raddetz of ABC News played the clip for homeland security adviser Thomas Boss and asked him his opinions on the clip. Boss said the following, “There’s a lot of cable news shows that reach directly into hundreds of thousands of viewers and they’re really not always very fair to the president. So I’m pretty proud of the president for developing a Twitter and a social media platform where he can talk directly to the American people.”

Raddatz responded asking the following, “He certainly can communicate to the people, but I want to ask you: Is that the kind of communication you want, that he’s beating up on somebody? That he’s beating up on the media? You’re in charge of homeland security there. That seems like a threat.”

The homeland security advisor maintained that the President has a right to defend himself and the video was not a threat but a master salesman playing a joke. Something that is completely within his purview and right. He also noted this is why they voted for and elected him because he is able to wonderfully relate to people.

However, Raddatz would not let it up and refused to let it go. She continued to attack President Trump and called deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders a liar for saying the President does not endorse violence in any way shape or form. She went really low discussing the shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise saying, “You know what happened to Congressman Scalise, and you have these messages out there against the media, and the media has had — I hate this to be all about us, but [Trump] is making it about us, or particularly CNN — some people had to get private security guards. Is that really fair?”

When Raddatz criticized him for not mentioning the issue of communication rather than the message Boss it back hard saying, “But it’s a good example of you or the media producers here deciding what it is that we talk about and what it is we don’t talk about. And so, with respect, I think that that’s why he needs to go around you and the producers that control the message, and directly to the people … and occasionally he likes to speak about those cable programs that are beating up on him unfairly.”

CNN, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC are collectively going crazy about this new video. While it certainly isn’t appropriate the video was by no means a threat. It was a stupid and silly video that brings levity to an acrimonious relationship. The relationship between the leader of the free world and a news outlet that had to fire reporters for publishing false articles. The more the President defends himself, the more the media goes nuts.